Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2512:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2601:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
May 0111:00 AM PDT
-12:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
E
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
45%
(medium)
Question Stats:
61% (01:30) correct
39%
(01:37)
wrong
based on 482
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Carrie: The title of the seminar we just attended, Being a Good Husband, is misleading. A title should describe all of the contents of a seminar, but nearly half of this seminar was involved with discussing wives.
Alan: I don’t think the title is misleading. It seems to me that husbands and wives are two sides of one relationship: marriage. One cannot be a husband without a wife.
Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the discussion above?
A. Carrie believes that the seminar should have been titled, Being a Good Wife.
B. Alan believes that there is no real distinction between the roles of husband and wife.
C. Carrie and Alan disagree about the relevance of traditional marriage.
D. Carrie and Alan disagree about the overall value of the seminar.
E. Carrie believes that the seminar title should not mention husbands without mentioning wives.
Alan: I don’t think the title is misleading. It seems to me that husbands and wives are two sides of one relationship: marriage. One cannot be a husband without a wife.
Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the discussion above?
A. Carrie believes that the seminar should have been titled, Being a Good Wife.
B. Alan believes that there is no real distinction between the roles of husband and wife.
C. Carrie and Alan disagree about the relevance of traditional marriage.
D. Carrie and Alan disagree about the overall value of the seminar.
E. Carrie believes that the seminar title should not mention husbands without mentioning wives.
31 Jul 2018, 01:25
Kudos
Bookmarks
Carrie: The title of the seminar we just attended, Being a Good Husband, is misleading. A title should describe all of the contents of a seminar, but nearly half of this seminar was involved with discussing wives.
Alan: I don’t think the title is misleading. It seems to me that husbands and wives are two sides of one relationship: marriage. One cannot be a husband without a wife.
Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the discussion above?
A. Carrie believes that the seminar should have been titled, Being a Good Wife.
not necessarily since half the seminar was on husbands too
B. Alan believes that there is no real distinction between the roles of husband and wife.
The role is not talked about but the relevance of title
C. Carrie and Alan disagree about the relevance of traditional marriage.
no mention of traditional marriage
D. Carrie and Alan disagree about the overall value of the seminar.
they disagree on the TITLE. nothing mentioned about overall value
E. Carrie believes that the seminar title should not mention husbands without mentioning wives.
Best available.... carrie talks of the need to have mentioned wives
A choice saying that the seminar should have had wives word too in it would be more apt..
E suggests that the title could have been without words husbands and wives but Carrie says that title should include the content and content included both wives and husbands. Although one can argue the title could have been marriage, couple but the argument never says that Carrie suggested to do away with both wordsetc
E
Alan: I don’t think the title is misleading. It seems to me that husbands and wives are two sides of one relationship: marriage. One cannot be a husband without a wife.
Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the discussion above?
A. Carrie believes that the seminar should have been titled, Being a Good Wife.
not necessarily since half the seminar was on husbands too
B. Alan believes that there is no real distinction between the roles of husband and wife.
The role is not talked about but the relevance of title
C. Carrie and Alan disagree about the relevance of traditional marriage.
no mention of traditional marriage
D. Carrie and Alan disagree about the overall value of the seminar.
they disagree on the TITLE. nothing mentioned about overall value
E. Carrie believes that the seminar title should not mention husbands without mentioning wives.
Best available.... carrie talks of the need to have mentioned wives
A choice saying that the seminar should have had wives word too in it would be more apt..
E suggests that the title could have been without words husbands and wives but Carrie says that title should include the content and content included both wives and husbands. Although one can argue the title could have been marriage, couple but the argument never says that Carrie suggested to do away with both wordsetc
E
31 Jul 2018, 03:16
Kudos
Bookmarks
The answer is E.
We can solve this using the
We can also always solve using the
A. Carrie believes that the seminar should have been titled, Being a Good Wife. no, Carrie thinks wives should have been mentioned as well, but not only
B. Alan believes that there is no real distinction between the roles of husband and wife. nowhere does it say anything like this
C. Carrie and Alan disagree about the relevance of traditional marriage. nowhere does it say anything like this
D. Carrie and Alan disagree about the overall value of the seminar. this is misleading - while it is possible, all we know is that they disagree about the accuracy of the title. it is still perfectly possible that they both found the seminar valuable
We can solve this using the
Precise
approach: it is clear from the argument that, while Alan thinks the title was fine, Carrie thinks the seminar's title should have mentioned both husbands and wives. this is exactly what E tell us: E. Carrie believes that the seminar title should not mention husbands without mentioning wives.We can also always solve using the
Alternative
approach of eliminating the answers:A. Carrie believes that the seminar should have been titled, Being a Good Wife. no, Carrie thinks wives should have been mentioned as well, but not only
B. Alan believes that there is no real distinction between the roles of husband and wife. nowhere does it say anything like this
C. Carrie and Alan disagree about the relevance of traditional marriage. nowhere does it say anything like this
D. Carrie and Alan disagree about the overall value of the seminar. this is misleading - while it is possible, all we know is that they disagree about the accuracy of the title. it is still perfectly possible that they both found the seminar valuable
