Last visit was: 05 Sep 2026, 22:48 It is currently 05 Sep 2026, 22:48
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Carcass
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Last visit: 04 Sep 2026
Posts: 4,741
Own Kudos:
38,671
 [8]
Given Kudos: 5,013
Posts: 4,741
Kudos: 38,671
 [8]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
6
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
JatinR
Joined: 28 Apr 2016
Last visit: 22 Feb 2020
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
4
 [1]
Given Kudos: 42
GPA: 3.5
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Posts: 9
Kudos: 4
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
KeyurJoshi
Joined: 28 Aug 2019
Last visit: 30 Aug 2023
Posts: 141
Own Kudos:
157
 [3]
Given Kudos: 405
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.6
WE:Business Development (Computer Software)
Products:
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
adipisfugat
Joined: 31 Dec 2025
Last visit: 05 Sep 2026
Posts: 27
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 40
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 545 Q80 V77 DI74
GPA: 7.96
GMAT Focus 1: 545 Q80 V77 DI74
Posts: 27
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Understanding the Argument's Structure
To evaluate any argument logically, you have to look closely at the connection between its evidence (premises) and its final conclusion.

The Evidence: A poll shows 80% of the public opposes relaxing air pollution regulations, and no "major segment" of the public wants them weakened.
The Conclusion: Therefore, legislators can renew the Clean Air Act to please the public without alienating any "significant special-interest groups."

The Logical Flap (Why Option A Matters)
The argument makes a massive leap by assuming that the "major segments of the public" surveyed in the poll overlap cleanly with—or include—the "significant special-interest groups" that actually lobby lawmakers.

Imagine a scenario where the poll surveyed everyday citizens, but powerful corporate lobbies (like manufacturing, energy, or automotive sectors) are the ones classified as "special-interest groups." If those special interests do want environmental laws relaxed, but the author simply chose not to label them as part of the public segments surveyed, the conclusion is broken. Knowing how these groups are defined tells us whether the author is comparing apples to apples or leaving out the most influential players.

Why the Other Options Fall Short

Option B (History of the laws): The length of time laws have been active doesn't help test whether lawmakers will face backlash from powerful groups today. It just provides historical trivia.

Option C (Economic effects): While economics matter in the real-world debate over pollution, the argument's logical flaw isn't about cost—it's about who is being grouped together as a "special-interest group" versus the "public."

Option D (The author's target audience): Who the author is trying to persuade changes the strategy of the writing, but it doesn't change whether the logical deduction within the argument holds water.

Option E (Survey non-respondents): In a landslide margin of 80% to 17%, even if every single person who refused to answer fell into the opposing camp, the overall majority would still heavily favor keeping regulations strict. Therefore, non-responses wouldn't alter the core math of public opinion.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7399 posts
Verbal Forum Moderator
705 posts