Hey there!
arvind910619Thanks for the quote. I was stuck between B and E.
Here's how I thought about the question.
Hmm.. What could make the copyright go beyond its purpose? And that naturally led me to think of something that would be related to the circulation of ideas (And that indeed is the purpose here). And
B seems to show that a copyright wouldn't be necessary when the authors themselves are willing to circulate ideas for free. So would giving these authors copyrights help them share better/ or share their ideas more frequently? I didn't really think so.
While E seemed as though it didn't really stop the copyright from doing what it really intended, i.e, help the authors share their ideas. For an author, he/she can write books/journals/etc. and have these circulated, even long after they're dead. Thinking on these lines caused me to cross this one out.
Now that I look at it, I guess I might have to reconsider.
B seems to really incline towards explaining whether copyright is necessary in the first place. And that is different from "serving a purpose".
E does the job of saying that on occasion of an author's death, still trying to provide copyrights would be pointless as the author wouldn't be alive to create and circulate more ideas.
OA is E.
You can find more explanations here -
https://forum.powerscore.com/lsat/viewtopic.php?t=12929