Premise 1: Computer manufacturers in Borneland have developed a production process that allows them to make computers at fifteen percent below the cost of those produced in Astonburgh.
Premise 2: Even after including shipping costs and tariffs, importing computers from Borneland is still less expensive than making them in Astonburgh.
The conclusion is implicit but can be inferred: The cost of importing computers from Borneland, including tariffs and shipping, is less than the cost of producing them in Astonburgh.
Let's look at the answer choices:
A. Computer parts are fifteen percent cheaper in Borneland than they are in Astonburgh.This answer choice is not directly supported by the argument. The argument mentions that the overall cost of manufacturing is lower, but it does not specify whether the lower cost is due to cheaper parts.
B. Importing computers from Borneland to Astonburgh will result in the loss of fifteen percent of Astonburgh's manufacturing jobs.This is speculative and not supported by the argument. The argument does not address the impact on jobs in Astonburgh.
C. The tariff Astonburgh imposes on computers from Borneland is less than fifteen percent of the cost of manufacturing computers in Astonburgh.This statement is strongly supported by the argument. If importing computers from Borneland is still less expensive despite tariffs and shipping costs, it suggests that these additional costs are not enough to outweigh the fifteen percent lower production cost in Borneland.
D. The transportation of a computer from Borneland to Astonburgh costs more than fifteen percent of the cost of manufacturing a computer in Astonburgh.This contradicts the argument. If transportation costs were more than fifteen percent, it would likely negate the savings from the lower production costs in Borneland, making the importation less attractive.
E. A computer can be manufactured in Borneland in eighty-five percent of the time it takes to manufacture one in Astonburgh.This statement relates to production time, not cost, and is not supported by the argument. The argument focuses on costs, not time.