Bunuel
An apartment complex is installing alarm systems in every apartment due to an increase in crime in the area. The manager reasons that he does not need to install an alarm system in apartment 3B because the tenant is a police officer and can protect himself.
Which one of the following decisions is based on a flawed reasoning that is most similar to the apartment manager’s reasoning?
(A) A deliveryman has limited time to deliver all his packages before returning to his office. The deliveryman reasons that they should be delivered in order of largest to smallest because there might not be enough time to deliver all of them.
(B) A candidate for mayor must prioritize the areas of the city where she must focus campaigning efforts. The candidate reasons that she spend all her resources in these areas where voters are less likely to vote for her because the other voters do not need to be convinced to vote for her.
(C) Members of a jury are given four hours to reach their verdict or the judge will dismiss them and declare a mistrial. The jury reasons they should have the foreman review the evidence and determine a verdict because the foreman is a lawyer.
(D) The captain of a yacht requires that all his passengers go through a safety training session. He reasons that one passenger did not have to attend because he was a former US naval officer.
(E) A manager discovers an employee has stolen food from the break room. He reasons that he should force all his employees to go through ethics training to make sure the guilty party never steals food again.
Original Argument of the author:Premises: Alarm system in every apartment due to increase in crime.
3B tenant is a police officer and can protect himself.
Conclusion:No need to install an alarm system in apartment 3B.
The reasoning is flawed. There are multiple reasons why an alarm system should be installed in 3B too. The police officer is a tenant and if he leaves, the next tenant would need an alarm system. Also, the police officer will not be present at home at all times. Even if he is when an intruder comes in, a warning given by the alarm system could be a deterrent and not put him in harm. The alarm system rule should be applicable to him too.
We need an argument, where an exception is made to a rule.
(A) A deliveryman has limited time to deliver all his packages before returning to his office. The deliveryman reasons that they should be delivered in order of largest to smallest because there might not be enough time to deliver all of them.The deliveryman only sets a pattern for delivery and makes no exception. This is not similar to our original argument.
(B) A candidate for mayor must prioritize the areas of the city where she must focus campaigning efforts. The candidate reasons that she spend all her resources in these areas where voters are less likely to vote for her because the other voters do not need to be convinced to vote for her.The candidate must prioritize as per resources. There is no ‘rule’ here. Hence, this is not similar to our original argument.
(C) Members of a jury are given four hours to reach their verdict or the judge will dismiss them and declare a mistrial. The jury reasons they should have the foreman review the evidence and determine a verdict because the foreman is a lawyer.
There is no exception made here so this is not similar to our original argument.
(D) The captain of a yacht requires that all his passengers go through a safety training session. He reasons that one passenger did not have to attend because he was a former US naval officer. There is a rule (that all his passengers go through a safety training session). He makes an exception for one person (a former naval officer). But this is unwarranted. The naval officer may not know the procedures to be followed on this yacht.
Hence this is similar to our original argument.
(E) A manager discovers an employee has stolen food from the break room. He reasons that he should force all his employees to go through ethics training to make sure the guilty party never steals food again.For one person, the manager makes a rule that needs to be followed by all. This reasoning is opposite of the reasoning of our original argument.
Answer (D)
Discussion on Mimic Questions: https://youtu.be/dHU17plF2mc