IMO B
Hiring recently graduated job candidates as product analysts is economically advantageous to manufacturers that ordinarily use older, more experienced analysts. That is the claim of many business analysts who argue that these candidates are often most aware of recent advances in product technology, and also can be hired for less money than more experienced candidates.
The claim of the business analysts as it is presented above would be most strengthened if which of the following were true?
A. In recent years, there have been more job openings for pan qualified candidates product analysts tho fill the positions. -- job opining are not related to having an economically advantageous business.
B. Those businesses with the highest percentage of recent graduates as product analysts have had lower per capita salaries and more profitable uses of new technology. --> this is adding to the point mentioned in the stem.
C. Undergraduate programs in fields relevant to product analysis have reported a general decline in enrollment in recent years. --> Talks about a future trend.
D. Job candidates with more experience in the field of product analysis often have a better understanding of providing effective products within realistic budgetary constraints. --> weakens the Conclusion.
E. Due to new, inexpensive Internet-based product survey technologies, many manufacturers are no longer relying on product analysts to identify strengths and weaknesses of consumer products. --> out of scope