Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2512:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
15 Sep 2022, 01:00
Kudos
Bookmarks
C
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
75%
(hard)
Question Stats:
54% (02:11) correct
46%
(02:16)
wrong
based on 362
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Recent highly visible court cases have led some legislators to question the very nature of specific inalienable constitutional rights. The First Amendment guarantees freedom of religion, allowing parents to decline medical care for their grievously ill children, due to religious beliefs. This often sparks debate. If a child can be saved with medical intervention, should the parents be legally bound to accept that treatment, despite religious convictions to the contrary? While freedom of religion is inherently good, it is a right that should be preserved according to specific preconditions.
Which of the following represents the most logical continuation of the passage?
(A) However, when discussing this issue, no one can accurately guess the intent of the authors of the constitution
(B) Though, since we hold the truth of these rights to be self-evident, they cannot be questioned or compromised
(C) Yet there will always be those who argue that this freedom must remain absolute to preserve the integrity of the Bill of Rights
(D) Yet a defenseless child lacks the constitutional rights to intervene medically on its behalf
(E) Clearly, the authors of the Bill of Rights did not anticipate future cases that would require specific protection for the rights of defenseless children
Which of the following represents the most logical continuation of the passage?
(A) However, when discussing this issue, no one can accurately guess the intent of the authors of the constitution
(B) Though, since we hold the truth of these rights to be self-evident, they cannot be questioned or compromised
(C) Yet there will always be those who argue that this freedom must remain absolute to preserve the integrity of the Bill of Rights
(D) Yet a defenseless child lacks the constitutional rights to intervene medically on its behalf
(E) Clearly, the authors of the Bill of Rights did not anticipate future cases that would require specific protection for the rights of defenseless children
15 Sep 2022, 07:45
Kudos
Bookmarks
Bunuel
Constitutional rights > argument which questions the effectiveness of the same > it has to be conditional > still some people questions on its integrity
(A) However, when discussing this issue, no one can accurately guess the intent of the authors of the constitution: no discussion for authors of the constitution. Irrelevant. Reject
(B) Though, since we hold the truth of these rights to be self-evident, they cannot be questioned or compromised: it is exactly the opposite. Reject
(C) Yet there will always be those who argue that this freedom must remain absolute to preserve the integrity of the Bill of Rights: correct.
(D) Yet a defenseless child lacks the constitutional rights to intervene medically on its behalf: No it doesn't complete the argument. Reject
(E) Clearly, the authors of the Bill of Rights did not anticipate future cases that would require specific protection for the rights of defenseless children: No it doesn't complete the argument. Reject
Answer is C
wadhwakaran
Joined: 31 Mar 2022
Last visit: 22 Jul 2025
Posts: 260
Given Kudos: 19
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, International Business
Schools: INSEAD Aug'24 intake Oxford Said'25 Judge '25 Imperial'25 HEC Sep'24 Intake LBS '26 ISB '27
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V35
GPA: 2.8
Products:
Schools: INSEAD Aug'24 intake Oxford Said'25 Judge '25 Imperial'25 HEC Sep'24 Intake LBS '26 ISB '27
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V35
Posts: 260
15 Sep 2022, 10:31
Kudos
Bookmarks
Author says recent court cases resulted in some legislators questioning the constitutional rights.
Then he cited a specific example of Freedom of Religion which allows parents to decline medical care for their child because of their religious beliefs. Then the author says this often sparks debate meaning that there are two sides one against this right and one in favor of this right.
further author says if a child can be saved with medical intervention should the parents be legally bound to accept the treatment if it is against their religious beliefs.
then author picks one side (against the freedom of religion or specifically saying it should be available subject to certain conditions). The logical continuation of this passage should be the other side of the debate (version of people supporting it blindly)
option C clearly presents that side. Therefore, the answer to this question.
Then he cited a specific example of Freedom of Religion which allows parents to decline medical care for their child because of their religious beliefs. Then the author says this often sparks debate meaning that there are two sides one against this right and one in favor of this right.
further author says if a child can be saved with medical intervention should the parents be legally bound to accept the treatment if it is against their religious beliefs.
then author picks one side (against the freedom of religion or specifically saying it should be available subject to certain conditions). The logical continuation of this passage should be the other side of the debate (version of people supporting it blindly)
option C clearly presents that side. Therefore, the answer to this question.
