JJ.jj
Most proposed legislation is introduced by legislators who, seeking to serve their own personal interests, stand to benefit if the legislation is passed into law. However, since most proposed legislation is not passed into law, most attempts by legislators to serve their own personal interests are unsuccessful.The reasoning in the argument above is vulnerable to criticism on which of the following grounds?A. It does not take into account the fact that legislation can be proposed by people other than legislators.B. It does not acknowledge that some proposed legislation is introduced by legislators who are not attempting to serve their own personal interests.C. It ignores the possibility that proposed legislation that serves a legislator's personal interests might also serve the interests of other people.D. It neglects to indicate what percentage of proposed legislation introduced by legislators is passed into law.E. It falls to rule out explicitly the possibility that legislators successfully serve their own personal interests by means other than proposed legislation.
The answer is E -
The argument concludes that - since
most proposed legislation is not passed into law, most attempts by legislators to serve their own personal interests are unsuccessful.
This directly establishes the causality that passing proposed legislation into law is the only way that servers the personal interests. For weakening, we could attack the causality, and weaken the reasoning saying there are other means apart from proposed legislation that the legislators can serve their own personal interests.
-----
Options B, C, D are concerned with passing the proposed legislation but we need to focus on the possibility that legislators are successful in serving their own personal interests.