by: bb
1 hr
by: SwiftMonk
1 hr
Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Sep 1312:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
Struggling to find the right strategies to score a 99 %ile on GMAT Focus? Riya (GMAT 715) boosted her score by 100-points in just 15 days! Discover how the right mentorship, tailored strategies, and an unwavering mindset can transform your GMAT prep.
Sep 1301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Sep 1507:00 PM EDT
-09:00 PM EST
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Sep 1808:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Sep 2107:00 PM EDT
-10:00 PM EDT
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 21, 2026 - Oct. 9, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
95%
(hard)
Question Stats:
50% (02:01) correct
50%
(02:20)
wrong
based on 255
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
A major asset management firm is considering divesting from companies that score poorly on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) metrics, under the belief that such companies pose long-term financial risks. The firm’s research indicates that ESG-aligned portfolios have, on average, outperformed traditional portfolios over the past five years. Therefore, the firm concludes that shifting to ESG-focused investments will likely improve long-term returns for its clients.
Which of the following would be most useful to evaluate in assessing the firm’s conclusion?
A. Whether the companies with low ESG scores operate in sectors that are currently under regulatory scrutiny or subject to rising compliance costs.
B. Whether the ESG-aligned portfolios that outperformed had comparable levels of sector and regional diversification as traditional portfolios.
C. Whether the clients of the firm are primarily interested in short-term returns or long-term capital appreciation.
D. Whether the firm’s research adequately excluded companies that made recent ESG improvements but had not yet seen changes in their ESG scores.
E. Whether companies with strong ESG scores are more likely to reinvest earnings into sustainability initiatives rather than dividend payouts.
_________________
Which of the following would be most useful to evaluate in assessing the firm’s conclusion?
A. Whether the companies with low ESG scores operate in sectors that are currently under regulatory scrutiny or subject to rising compliance costs.
B. Whether the ESG-aligned portfolios that outperformed had comparable levels of sector and regional diversification as traditional portfolios.
C. Whether the clients of the firm are primarily interested in short-term returns or long-term capital appreciation.
D. Whether the firm’s research adequately excluded companies that made recent ESG improvements but had not yet seen changes in their ESG scores.
E. Whether companies with strong ESG scores are more likely to reinvest earnings into sustainability initiatives rather than dividend payouts.
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
V40-07
_________________
New to the GMAT Club?
- • Questions: Question Bank | Bunuel's Signature Collection
• Tests: GMAT Club Tests | Forum Quiz
• Guides: Quantitative | Critical Reasoning | Reading Comprehension | Ultimate Quant Guide | All You Need for Quant
• Rules: Quantitative | Verbal
Bunuel
GMAT Club Official Explanation:
A. Whether the companies with low ESG scores operate in sectors that are currently under regulatory scrutiny or subject to rising compliance costs.
This would tell you if low-ESG companies are under extra pressure from rules or fines. It’s somewhat related, but it doesn’t test whether ESG portfolios’ outperformance was due to ESG or something else. It’s about the risk of low-ESG companies, not whether ESG performance will continue.
B. CORRECT. Whether the ESG-aligned portfolios that outperformed had comparable levels of sector and regional diversification as traditional portfolios.
This is exactly the kind of thing you’d want to check. If ESG portfolios outperformed just because they were heavy in, say, tech stocks or a hot region, and not because of ESG factors, then the firm’s conclusion could be off. This gets to the heart of whether ESG really drives performance or if it’s a coincidence. This is the most useful for testing their conclusion.
C. Whether the clients of the firm are primarily interested in short-term returns or long-term capital appreciation.
This is about client preferences, not about whether ESG will actually give better returns. It might help with marketing or framing, but it doesn’t test the validity of the “ESG = better long-term returns” conclusion.
D. Whether the firm’s research adequately excluded companies that made recent ESG improvements but had not yet seen changes in their ESG scores.
This checks whether their data was clean but it’s more about whether some companies were misclassified. It’s a side issue. It doesn’t test if ESG-aligned portfolios outperform because of ESG or some other factor.
E. Whether companies with strong ESG scores are more likely to reinvest earnings into sustainability initiatives rather than dividend payouts.
This is interesting from a behavior standpoint, but it doesn’t test whether ESG portfolios will outperform going forward. Dividend policy doesn’t prove or disprove their conclusion about long-term returns.
_________________
New to the GMAT Club?
- • Questions: Question Bank | Bunuel's Signature Collection
• Tests: GMAT Club Tests | Forum Quiz
• Guides: Quantitative | Critical Reasoning | Reading Comprehension | Ultimate Quant Guide | All You Need for Quant
• Rules: Quantitative | Verbal
General Discussion
Let's eliminate each:
A. Relevant to risk but does not test whether ESG caused outperformance
B. Useful
C. Client preference does not evaluate truth of conclusion
D. About accuracy of ESG score not investment performance comparison
E. About use of profits not portfolio return
Hence, B
A. Relevant to risk but does not test whether ESG caused outperformance
B. Useful
C. Client preference does not evaluate truth of conclusion
D. About accuracy of ESG score not investment performance comparison
E. About use of profits not portfolio return
Hence, B
Archit3110
Major Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2017
Last visit: 12 Sep 2026
Posts: 8,816
Status:You learn more from failure than from success.
Location: India
Concentration: Sustainability, Marketing
GMAT Focus 1: 545 Q79 V79 DI73 
GMAT Focus 2: 645 Q83 V82 DI81 
GPA: 4
WE:Marketing (Energy)
GMAT Focus 2: 645 Q83 V82 DI81
Posts: 8,816
A major asset management firm is considering divesting from companies that score poorly on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) metrics, under the belief that such companies pose long-term financial risks. The firm’s research indicates that ESG-aligned portfolios have, on average, outperformed traditional portfolios over the past five years. Therefore, the firm concludes that shifting to ESG-focused investments will likely improve long-term returns for its clients.
Asset management firm is considering divesting from poorly scored ESG metrics companies... belief that it has long term financial risks..
ESG aligned portfolios have avg out performed last 5 years..
conclusion ; shifting to ESG focused investments improve long term returns
Which of the following would be most useful to evaluate in assessing the firm’s conclusion?
USE variance test to evaluate the conclusion ; strengthen and weaken the conclusion
A. Yes /No the companies with low ESG scores operate in sectors that are currently under regulatory scrutiny or subject to rising compliance costs.
this does not strengthen and weaken the conclusion
B. Yes / No the ESG-aligned portfolios that outperformed had comparable levels of sector and regional diversification as traditional portfolios.
correct option as it strengthens and weakens the conclusion
C. Yes / No the clients of the firm are primarily interested in short-term returns or long-term capital appreciation.
does not effect the conclusion ..
D. Yes / No the firm’s research adequately excluded companies that made recent ESG improvements but had not yet seen changes in their ESG scores.
not relevant to conclusion to strengthen or weaken it..
E. Yes / No the companies with strong ESG scores are more likely to reinvest earnings into sustainability initiatives rather than dividend payouts.
does not effect the argument to strengthen or weaken it
OPTION B is correct
Asset management firm is considering divesting from poorly scored ESG metrics companies... belief that it has long term financial risks..
ESG aligned portfolios have avg out performed last 5 years..
conclusion ; shifting to ESG focused investments improve long term returns
Which of the following would be most useful to evaluate in assessing the firm’s conclusion?
USE variance test to evaluate the conclusion ; strengthen and weaken the conclusion
A. Yes /No the companies with low ESG scores operate in sectors that are currently under regulatory scrutiny or subject to rising compliance costs.
this does not strengthen and weaken the conclusion
B. Yes / No the ESG-aligned portfolios that outperformed had comparable levels of sector and regional diversification as traditional portfolios.
correct option as it strengthens and weakens the conclusion
C. Yes / No the clients of the firm are primarily interested in short-term returns or long-term capital appreciation.
does not effect the conclusion ..
D. Yes / No the firm’s research adequately excluded companies that made recent ESG improvements but had not yet seen changes in their ESG scores.
not relevant to conclusion to strengthen or weaken it..
E. Yes / No the companies with strong ESG scores are more likely to reinvest earnings into sustainability initiatives rather than dividend payouts.
does not effect the argument to strengthen or weaken it
OPTION B is correct
Posts: 55
Bunuel
The firm's conclusion rests on the logic:
• ESG-aligned portfolios outperformed traditional portfolios over the past five years.
• Therefore, shifting to ESG-focused investments will likely improve long-term returns.
Option A: Helps explain why ESG might matter, but doesn't test whether past outperformances were actually caused by ESG alignment.
Option B: PERFECT. If diversification were not comparable, the evidence doesn't isolate ESG as a causal factor, weakening the firm's inference.
Option C: Concerns client preference, not the validity of the financial conclusion.
Option D: Concerns ESG measurement accuracy, but not the performance comparison itself.
Option E: Addresses payout policy, which may affect returns, but doesn't assess whether ESG caused outperformance.
Hence, OPTION B.
Posts: 477
Bunuel
Deconstructing the Argument
Evidence: Firm's research shows ESG portfolios outperformed traditional ones over the past 5 years.
Conclusion: Shifting to ESG investments will likely improve long-term returns.
Underlying Assumption: The past outperformance was caused by the "ESG factor" itself, not by confounding variables like sector allocation or regional biases.
Evaluate the Argument
To determine if the past 5 years of data are predictive of the future, we need to know if the comparison was fair ("apples to apples").
If ESG portfolios just happened to be overweight in booming sectors (e.g., Technology) and underweight in lagging sectors (e.g., Energy) purely by definition, the performance might be due to sector bets, not ESG quality.
If the market cycle rotates, that advantage disappears.
Analyze the Options
A. Whether the companies with low ESG scores operate in sectors that are currently under regulatory scrutiny...
This focuses on the "risk" side of the premise. While relevant to the general theory, it doesn't help evaluate the specific statistical evidence provided (the 5-year outperformance).
B. Whether the ESG-aligned portfolios that outperformed had comparable levels of sector and regional diversification as traditional portfolios. CORRECT.
This checks for Selection Bias or Confounding Variables.
If Yes (Comparable): The outperformance is likely due to ESG factors. Conclusion is strengthened.
If No (Not Comparable):
The outperformance could simply be because the ESG portfolios were lucky to be in the right sectors at the right time (e.g., heavy in Tech during a bull market). Conclusion is weakened. This is the most critical missing critical piece of content.
C. Whether the clients of the firm are primarily interested in short-term returns or long-term capital appreciation.
Client preference does not affect the objective truth of whether the returns will actually improve.
D. Whether the firm’s research adequately excluded companies that made recent ESG improvements...
This is a minor methodological detail compared to the structural issue of sector diversification.
E. Whether companies with strong ESG scores are more likely to reinvest earnings...
This explains how companies operate but doesn't directly help evaluate the comparative performance data between the two portfolio types.
Answer: B
Posts: 1,382
A - This kind of explains why it's not a good idea to invest in these companies.
B - This makes sense, this levels the ground by eliminating other factors contributing to the success of ESG aligned portfolio. it is suggesting that the portfolio where similar wrt sector, regions
C - client preference is not a concern
D - this is more of definition/specifics of how the portfolio companies are picked/updated
E - reinvestment vs dividend is not a concern.
B - This makes sense, this levels the ground by eliminating other factors contributing to the success of ESG aligned portfolio. it is suggesting that the portfolio where similar wrt sector, regions
C - client preference is not a concern
D - this is more of definition/specifics of how the portfolio companies are picked/updated
E - reinvestment vs dividend is not a concern.
Bunuel
B
to compare ESG-focused investments to those that are not ESG-focused, the data must be comparable so you can figure out if the better performance is really caused by the ESG factor or by something else.
to compare ESG-focused investments to those that are not ESG-focused, the data must be comparable so you can figure out if the better performance is really caused by the ESG factor or by something else.
Posts: 81
Question type: Evaluation.
So with each statement, we can answer Yes/No and see the answers can weaken/strengthen (relevant) to the firm's conclusion.
A. Incorrect. Can't evaluate the conclusion with this statement.
B. Incorrect. Compare ESG portfolios and traditional portfolios can't evaluate whether investing in ESG companies will provide long term benefits for clients.
C. Incorrect. The clients' preferences don't help with assessing the firm's conclusion.
D. CORRECT. If the firm excluded these companies, their conclusion is well-supported. If the firm did not exclude these companies, their conclusion is flaw.
E. Incorrect. The companies want to reinvest earnings into anything don't help with assessing the conclusion.
So with each statement, we can answer Yes/No and see the answers can weaken/strengthen (relevant) to the firm's conclusion.
A. Incorrect. Can't evaluate the conclusion with this statement.
B. Incorrect. Compare ESG portfolios and traditional portfolios can't evaluate whether investing in ESG companies will provide long term benefits for clients.
C. Incorrect. The clients' preferences don't help with assessing the firm's conclusion.
D. CORRECT. If the firm excluded these companies, their conclusion is well-supported. If the firm did not exclude these companies, their conclusion is flaw.
E. Incorrect. The companies want to reinvest earnings into anything don't help with assessing the conclusion.
Bunuel
We need to evaluate here whether ESG companies would deliver long term returns
A - this does not helps us evaluate the argument as reasons other than ESG for lower returns are outside the scope of our argument
B - we are not considered with diversification but only possibility of long term returns
C - client’s preferences are irrelevant in understanding whether ESG investments deliver long term returns
D - this is a minor adjustment which does not impact our argument
E - this option will indeed help us evaluate whether there is some chance of profitable growth in the future for ESG companies.
Therefore, Option E
A - this does not helps us evaluate the argument as reasons other than ESG for lower returns are outside the scope of our argument
B - we are not considered with diversification but only possibility of long term returns
C - client’s preferences are irrelevant in understanding whether ESG investments deliver long term returns
D - this is a minor adjustment which does not impact our argument
E - this option will indeed help us evaluate whether there is some chance of profitable growth in the future for ESG companies.
Therefore, Option E
Posts: 112
Answer B
ESG portfolios may have been concentrated in a certain sector that outpreformed. The ESG metrics may not have had anything to do with outpreformance. You want to make sure you are comparing apples to apples. The sectors and regional diversifications have to be the same when comparing. Only difference should be ESG metrics.
ESG portfolios may have been concentrated in a certain sector that outpreformed. The ESG metrics may not have had anything to do with outpreformance. You want to make sure you are comparing apples to apples. The sectors and regional diversifications have to be the same when comparing. Only difference should be ESG metrics.
Bunuel
ESG aligned portfolios have outperformed traditional portfolios over the past five years.
Conclusion: shifting to ESG focused investments will likely improve long term returns.
A. This option does not directly test whether past performance was due to ESG alignment.....No
B. Whether ESG aligned portfolios have comparable sector and regional diversification. If ESG portfolios were heavily weighted toward high performing sectors, then their outperformance might not be caused by ESG ........Answer
C. This does mot address whther ESG investing improves returns.....No
D. This option does not address the link behjnd the outperformace........No
E. This option does jot explain whther ESG explains higher retuens......Irrelevant
B
Conclusion: shifting to ESG focused investments will likely improve long term returns.
A. This option does not directly test whether past performance was due to ESG alignment.....No
B. Whether ESG aligned portfolios have comparable sector and regional diversification. If ESG portfolios were heavily weighted toward high performing sectors, then their outperformance might not be caused by ESG ........Answer
C. This does mot address whther ESG investing improves returns.....No
D. This option does not address the link behjnd the outperformace........No
E. This option does jot explain whther ESG explains higher retuens......Irrelevant
B
A. Whether the companies with low ESG scores operate in sectors that are currently under regulatory scrutiny or subject to rising compliance costs. Even if a company is not facing issues, the research result still holds.
B. Whether the ESG-aligned portfolios that outperformed had comparable levels of sector and regional diversification as traditional portfolios. Correct. This tries to rule out any other factor that could be involved.
C. Whether the clients of the firm are primarily interested in short-term returns or long-term capital appreciation. Out of scope
D. Whether the firm’s research adequately excluded companies that made recent ESG improvements but had not yet seen changes in their ESG scores. Even if this is true, research result is still significant.
E. Whether companies with strong ESG scores are more likely to reinvest earnings into sustainability initiatives rather than dividend payouts. Out of scope
Ans B
B. Whether the ESG-aligned portfolios that outperformed had comparable levels of sector and regional diversification as traditional portfolios. Correct. This tries to rule out any other factor that could be involved.
C. Whether the clients of the firm are primarily interested in short-term returns or long-term capital appreciation. Out of scope
D. Whether the firm’s research adequately excluded companies that made recent ESG improvements but had not yet seen changes in their ESG scores. Even if this is true, research result is still significant.
E. Whether companies with strong ESG scores are more likely to reinvest earnings into sustainability initiatives rather than dividend payouts. Out of scope
Ans B
ESG Aligned portfolios have outperformed, traditional portfolios over the last 5 years claiming that shifting to ESG will likely, improve long term returns.
Gap seems to be that the firm assures that the outperformance was due to ESG.
A: Regulatory scrutiny or subjected to Compliance costs. Doesn't help evaluate the reason of outperformance was due to ESG or something else. (Incorrect)
B: Are the sectors that ESG were performing comparable to those of the others. (Correct)
C: Clients' Interest in Short term vs long term. Its already stated that the interest is for the long term investments. Hence won't help evaluating. (Incorrect)
D: Exclusion of recent improvers. Just states how the research was conducted. Nothing comparative information was stated. (Incorrect)
E: Investment vs dividends: Just states how companies uses their money. Not about ESG's scores vs others. (Incorrect)
Gap seems to be that the firm assures that the outperformance was due to ESG.
A: Regulatory scrutiny or subjected to Compliance costs. Doesn't help evaluate the reason of outperformance was due to ESG or something else. (Incorrect)
B: Are the sectors that ESG were performing comparable to those of the others. (Correct)
C: Clients' Interest in Short term vs long term. Its already stated that the interest is for the long term investments. Hence won't help evaluating. (Incorrect)
D: Exclusion of recent improvers. Just states how the research was conducted. Nothing comparative information was stated. (Incorrect)
E: Investment vs dividends: Just states how companies uses their money. Not about ESG's scores vs others. (Incorrect)
Bunuel
The correct answer that supports our argument is B.
Posts: 166
Main Point: Shifting to ESG will increase returns
Basis: Research shows evidence
Logic: Since the increase happened for research cases, it will happen for the firm.
Gaps: Results from a sample does not guarantee the same outcome.
(A), (C), (D), (E) - Irrelevant to evaluate the argument.
(B) - It will help us identify whether the research sample compared similar portfolios. This will help us establish how robust the research results are.
(B) is the answer
Basis: Research shows evidence
Logic: Since the increase happened for research cases, it will happen for the firm.
Gaps: Results from a sample does not guarantee the same outcome.
(A), (C), (D), (E) - Irrelevant to evaluate the argument.
(B) - It will help us identify whether the research sample compared similar portfolios. This will help us establish how robust the research results are.
(B) is the answer
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q80 V87 DI80
Posts: 105
Bunuel
Going through each sentence to understand the argument:
S1: Firm believes low ESG metrics = long-term financial risks.
S2: Research shows that high ESG metrics = better performance over 5 years.
S3: Conclusion - shifting to ESG = better long-term returns for clients.
We're asking to identify what factor the firm needs to account for when proposing this conclusion.
Option A: Regulatory scrutiny and compliance costs are a factor, but don't have a direct line into the cause-and-effect of "ESG=better long-term returns). Not relevant enough, eliminate.
Option B: Diversification lowers risk, but we're dealing with returns for clients. Irrelevant, eliminate.
Option C: This is a very good question to ask - do clients even want long-term returns? Let's put a pin in this.
Option D: These kinds of firms would boost the traditional portfolio numbers, but the research shows that ESG is better long-term. We're not looking to refute the facts in the argument. Eliminate.
Option E: This is also a good question to ask. If the company reinvests, there's less dividend payout for investors. However, long-term returns are not just made up of dividend payouts, it's also the return on the share itself. This choice is very tempting but it just doesn't encompass the point of the conclusion entirely, at least not as neatly as option C does. Eliminate.
Thus C is the best option here.
Bunuel
A. Knowing this information is not relevant. What's the reason for subperformance is not of relevance. Eliminate A.
B. Correct : This information can be helpfult. If the ESG aligned portfolios did have diversification, the diversification could have been the result of performance and not the ESG mertic. Keep.
C. Out of scope. The need of client is not in contention here.
D. The information is not helpful. The outcome of the research is already presented to us. Hence, this information is of not much use.
E. Irrelevant information. What does the companies with strong ESG do, is not required.
Option B
Posts: 68
Conclusion - ESG focussed will improve long term profit for clients.
Logic given - ESG outperformed Traditional.
To evaluate - Is the data given can be a relaible indicator or any hidden charges which can affect long term profit
E says maybe there are hidden charges.
IMO 3 (e)😶
Logic given - ESG outperformed Traditional.
To evaluate - Is the data given can be a relaible indicator or any hidden charges which can affect long term profit
E says maybe there are hidden charges.
IMO 3 (e)😶
ghimires28
Joined: 19 Jul 2025
Last visit: 19 Aug 2026
Posts: 27
Location: Nepal
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
Posts: 27
The text says ESG company outperform NON-ESG firm and concludes saying they will outperform them in the long run.
what will determine this truth:
Only option E doe that therefore option E.
what will determine this truth:
Only option E doe that therefore option E.
Moderators:
Announcements
How to Tell If Your GMAT Prep Resources Are Actually Helping You
Subscribe to GMAT Club for New Podcast Episodes, Debriefs, & Insightful Sessions on GMAT Preparation
Subscribe to GMAT Club for New Podcast Episodes, Debriefs, & Insightful Sessions on GMAT Preparation
Tuck at Dartmouth
AI at Dartmouth Tuck: How the School Is Preparing Leaders for the Age of Artificial Intelligence
Inside the courses, research, and hands-on learning defining wise, decisive leadership in an AI-driven world.
Read More
Inside the courses, research, and hands-on learning defining wise, decisive leadership in an AI-driven world.
Read More
Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos
Success stories and strategies from high-scoring candidates.