Underestimate the argument -
A publisher is now providing university professors with the option of ordering custom textbooks for their courses. - Fact
The professors can edit out those chapters of a book they are not interested in and add material of their own choosing. - Fact
Option Elimination - The widespread use of the option mentioned above is LEAST likely to contribute to fulfilling which of the following educational objectives?
(A) Coverage of material relevant to a particular student body’s specific needs - This aligns with the customization objective. That is not our answer.
(B) Offering advanced elective courses that pursue in-depth investigation of selected topics in a field - This aligns with the customization objective. That is not our answer.
(C) Ensuring that students nationwide engaged in a specific course of study are uniformly exposed to a basic set of readings - They can't get uniform if professors in different universities customize. Ok.
(D) Making the textbooks used in university courses more satisfactory from the individual teacher’s point of view - This aligns with the customization objective. That is not our answer.
(E) Keeping students’ interest in a course by offering lively, well-written reading assignments - This aligns with the customization objective. That is not our answer.