Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 23:13 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 23:13
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
MathRevolution
User avatar
Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Last visit: 27 Sep 2022
Posts: 10,063
Own Kudos:
20,000
 [21]
Given Kudos: 4
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
GPA: 3.82
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
Posts: 10,063
Kudos: 20,000
 [21]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
20
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
lucajava
Joined: 21 Feb 2019
Last visit: 18 Jul 2019
Posts: 68
Own Kudos:
353
 [6]
Given Kudos: 66
Location: Italy
Posts: 68
Kudos: 353
 [6]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
GMATGuruNY
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Last visit: 02 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,347
Own Kudos:
3,905
 [1]
Given Kudos: 9
Schools:Dartmouth College
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,347
Kudos: 3,905
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Rogerkille
Joined: 26 Feb 2017
Last visit: 07 Mar 2021
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 6
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
When solving the absolute value inequality after x I got:

0>x>-3
0>x>-1
User avatar
MathRevolution
User avatar
Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Last visit: 27 Sep 2022
Posts: 10,063
Own Kudos:
20,000
 [2]
Given Kudos: 4
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
GPA: 3.82
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
Posts: 10,063
Kudos: 20,000
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
=>

By definition, if \(x ≥ 0\), then \(|x| = x\) and if \(x < 0, |x| = -x.\)

If \(x ≥ 0\), then \(0<|x|-2x<3\) is equivalent to \(0 < x – 2x < 3\) or \(0 < -x < 3.\)
So, \(-3 < x < 0\), which does not satisfy the assumption \(x ≥ 0\).
If \(x < 0\), then \(0<|x|-2x<3\) is equivalent to \(0 < -x -2x < 3\) or \(0 < -3x < 3.\)
Then \(-1 < x < 0\), which satisfies the assumption \(x < 0.\)
Thus, the solution set is \(-1<x<0.\)

Therefore, the answer is A.
Answer: A
User avatar
shanu777
Joined: 13 Sep 2021
Last visit: 28 Jan 2025
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 43
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MathRevolution
=>

By definition, if \(x ≥ 0\), then \(|x| = x\) and if \(x < 0, |x| = -x.\)

If \(x ≥ 0\), then \(0<|x|-2x<3\) is equivalent to \(0 < x – 2x < 3\) or \(0 < -x < 3.\)
So, \(-3 < x < 0\), which does not satisfy the assumption \(x ≥ 0\).
If \(x < 0\), then \(0<|x|-2x<3\) is equivalent to \(0 < -x -2x < 3\) or \(0 < -3x < 3.\)
Then \(-1 < x < 0\), which satisfies the assumption \(x < 0.\)
Thus, the solution set is \(-1<x<0.\)

Therefore, the answer is A.
Answer: A
­Hi, so when x<0, we are taking negative values of x, so would the equation boil down to 0<-x-(2*(-x))<3 which would equal 0<-x-(-2x)<3---->0<-x+2x<3


I am confused in this part, if you could clarify a little.

thanks
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,802
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,868
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,802
Kudos: 810,894
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shanu777

MathRevolution
=>

By definition, if \(x ≥ 0\), then \(|x| = x\) and if \(x < 0, |x| = -x.\)

If \(x ≥ 0\), then \(0<|x|-2x<3\) is equivalent to \(0 < x – 2x < 3\) or \(0 < -x < 3.\)
So, \(-3 < x < 0\), which does not satisfy the assumption \(x ≥ 0\).
If \(x < 0\), then \(0<|x|-2x<3\) is equivalent to \(0 < -x -2x < 3\) or \(0 < -3x < 3.\)
Then \(-1 < x < 0\), which satisfies the assumption \(x < 0.\)
Thus, the solution set is \(-1<x<0.\)

Therefore, the answer is A.
Answer: A
­Hi, so when x<0, we are taking negative values of x, so would the equation boil down to 0<-x-(2*(-x))<3 which would equal 0<-x-(-2x)<3---->0<-x+2x<3


I am confused in this part, if you could clarify a little.

thanks
­When x < 0, we have |x| = -x. However, this does not mean that x is replaced with -x; it stays as x.

So, for x < 0, the inequality 0 < |x| - 2x < 3 becomes:

0 < (-x) - 2x < 3
This simplifies to:

0 < -3x < 3
After multiplying by -1, we get:

-3 < 3x < 0
which further simplifies to:

-1 < x < 0­

10. Absolute Value



For more check Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread



Hope it helps.­
Moderators:
Math Expert
109802 posts
Tuck School Moderator
853 posts