Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 20:13 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 20:13
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Hussain15
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 Jun 2009
Last visit: 07 Jul 2021
Posts: 1,075
Own Kudos:
3,539
 [82]
Given Kudos: 157
Status:The last round
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V34
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V34
Posts: 1,075
Kudos: 3,539
 [82]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
80
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,785
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,853
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,785
Kudos: 810,876
 [29]
18
Kudos
Add Kudos
11
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
AbhayPrasanna
Joined: 04 May 2010
Last visit: 05 Jan 2025
Posts: 60
Own Kudos:
359
 [7]
Given Kudos: 7
GPA: 3.8
WE 1: 2 yrs - Oilfield Service
Products:
Posts: 60
Kudos: 359
 [7]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
GMATBLACKBELT720
Joined: 07 Jun 2010
Last visit: 16 Jul 2010
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
32
 [2]
Given Kudos: 2
Affiliations: NYSSA
Location: New York City
Concentration: Finance
Schools:Wharton, Stanford, MIT, NYU, Columbia, LBS, Berkeley (MFE program)
GPA: 3.5
WE 1: Senior Associate - Thomson Reuters
WE 2: Analyst - TIAA CREF
Posts: 21
Kudos: 32
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Hussain15
If x + |x| + y = 7 and x + |y| - y =6 , then x + y =

A. 3
B. 4
C. 5
D. 6
E. 9

If \(x\leq{0}\), then \(x + |x| + y = 7\) becomes: \(x-x+y=7\) --> \(y=7>0\), but then \(x + |y| - y =6\) becomes: \(x+y-y=6\) --> \(x=6>0\), which contradicts the initial assumption \(x\leq{0}\). So \(x\) can not be \(\leq{0}\) --> hence \(x>0\).

Similarly if \(y\geq{0}\), then \(x + |y| - y =6\) becomes: \(x+y-y=6\) --> \(x=6>0\), but then \(x + |x| + y = 7\) becomes: \(x+x+y=12+y=7\) --> \(y=-5<0\), which contradicts the initial assumption \(y\geq{0}\). So \(y\) can not be \(\geq{0}\) --> hence \(y<0\).

So \(x>0\) and \(y<0\):
\(x+|x|+y=7\) becomes: \(x-x+y=7\) --> \(2x+y=7\);
\(x+|y|-y=6\) becomes: \(x-y-y=6\) --> \(x-2y=6\).

Solving: \(x=4\) and \(y=-1\) --> \(x+y=3\).

Answer: A.

I feel there is an easier way, but world cup makes it harder to concentrate.


Why when y<0 do we get -2y?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,785
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,853
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,785
Kudos: 810,876
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATBLACKBELT720
Bunuel
Hussain15
If x + |x| + y = 7 and x + |y| - y =6 , then x + y =

A. 3
B. 4
C. 5
D. 6
E. 9

If \(x\leq{0}\), then \(x + |x| + y = 7\) becomes: \(x-x+y=7\) --> \(y=7>0\), but then \(x + |y| - y =6\) becomes: \(x+y-y=6\) --> \(x=6>0\), which contradicts the initial assumption \(x\leq{0}\). So \(x\) can not be \(\leq{0}\) --> hence \(x>0\).

Similarly if \(y\geq{0}\), then \(x + |y| - y =6\) becomes: \(x+y-y=6\) --> \(x=6>0\), but then \(x + |x| + y = 7\) becomes: \(x+x+y=12+y=7\) --> \(y=-5<0\), which contradicts the initial assumption \(y\geq{0}\). So \(y\) can not be \(\geq{0}\) --> hence \(y<0\).

So \(x>0\) and \(y<0\):
\(x+|x|+y=7\) becomes: \(x-x+y=7\) --> \(2x+y=7\);
\(x+|y|-y=6\) becomes: \(x-y-y=6\) --> \(x-2y=6\).

Solving: \(x=4\) and \(y=-1\) --> \(x+y=3\).

Answer: A.

I feel there is an easier way, but world cup makes it harder to concentrate.


Why when y<0 do we get -2y?

When \(y<0\), then \(|y|=-y\) and \(x+|y|-y=6\) becomes: \(x-y-y=6\) --> \(x-2y=6\).
User avatar
GMATBLACKBELT720
Joined: 07 Jun 2010
Last visit: 16 Jul 2010
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Affiliations: NYSSA
Location: New York City
Concentration: Finance
Schools:Wharton, Stanford, MIT, NYU, Columbia, LBS, Berkeley (MFE program)
GPA: 3.5
WE 1: Senior Associate - Thomson Reuters
WE 2: Analyst - TIAA CREF
Posts: 21
Kudos: 32
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
^
Wow... confusing as heck. Essentially saying that (hypothetical number here) |-3| = -(-3), thats fine. But I kept thinking you would apply this to -y and essentially make it +y since and make them both +y...
User avatar
amit2k9
Joined: 08 May 2009
Last visit: 18 Jun 2017
Posts: 535
Own Kudos:
646
 [1]
Given Kudos: 10
Status:There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Posts: 535
Kudos: 646
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
for x>0 and x < 0
2x+ y = 7 and y = 7

for y>0 and y<0
x=6 and x-2y=6

for x,y<0 solution exists.
solving x=4 and y = -1

3
avatar
s8388
Joined: 09 Nov 2011
Last visit: 03 May 2016
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
If x + |x| + y = 7 and x + |y| - y =6 , then x + y =

can be done in 2.3 mins :

there are 4 cases to be tested :
1) x is -ve and y is -ve
substituting in the equation , we get x-x+y=7 and x-y-y=6 solve for x and y we get x=20 and y=7 , so x+y=27 REJECT

2)x is +ve and y is +ve

substitute in the equation, we ger x+x+y=7 and x+y-y=6 solve for x and y we get x=6 and y=-5 ,therefore x+y=1 not on list so REJECT

3) x is -ve and y is +ve

substitute , we get x-x=y=7 and x+y-y=6 solve fo x and y we get x=6 and y=7, x+y=13 not on list so REJECT

4) x is +ve and y is -ve

substitute , we get x+x=y=7 and x-y-y=6 solve for x and y , we get x=4 and y= -1 ,x+y=3 , ANSWER CHOICE
User avatar
swati007
Joined: 14 Jun 2011
Last visit: 22 May 2015
Posts: 51
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 15
GMAT 1: 560 Q41 V25
Posts: 51
Kudos: 276
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I solved in 1.36 mins :)
avatar
jjack0310
Joined: 04 May 2013
Last visit: 06 Jan 2014
Posts: 32
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 32
Kudos: 25
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
GMATBLACKBELT720
Bunuel


If \(x\leq{0}\), then \(x + |x| + y = 7\) becomes: \(x-x+y=7\) --> \(y=7>0\), but then \(x + |y| - y =6\) becomes: \(x+y-y=6\) --> \(x=6>0\), which contradicts the initial assumption \(x\leq{0}\). So \(x\) can not be \(\leq{0}\) --> hence \(x>0\).

Similarly if \(y\geq{0}\), then \(x + |y| - y =6\) becomes: \(x+y-y=6\) --> \(x=6>0\), but then \(x + |x| + y = 7\) becomes: \(x+x+y=12+y=7\) --> \(y=-5<0\), which contradicts the initial assumption \(y\geq{0}\). So \(y\) can not be \(\geq{0}\) --> hence \(y<0\).

So \(x>0\) and \(y<0\):
\(x+|x|+y=7\) becomes: \(x-x+y=7\) --> \(2x+y=7\);
\(x+|y|-y=6\) becomes: \(x-y-y=6\) --> \(x-2y=6\).

Solving: \(x=4\) and \(y=-1\) --> \(x+y=3\).

Answer: A.

I feel there is an easier way, but world cup makes it harder to concentrate.


Why when y<0 do we get -2y?

When \(y<0\), then \(|y|=-y\) and \(x+|y|-y=6\) becomes: \(x-y-y=6\) --> \(x-2y=6\).

Sorry, still confusing me.
I understand the first y i.e.
|y| = -y
But y < 0,
so wouldn't x + |y| - y = x - y - (-y), which would make it just x?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,785
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,853
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,785
Kudos: 810,876
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jjack0310
Bunuel
GMATBLACKBELT720


Why when y<0 do we get -2y?

When \(y<0\), then \(|y|=-y\) and \(x+|y|-y=6\) becomes: \(x-y-y=6\) --> \(x-2y=6\).

Sorry, still confusing me.
I understand the first y i.e.
|y| = -y
But y < 0,
so wouldn't x + |y| - y = x - y - (-y), which would make it just x?

When y<0, then |y|=-y: correct. But y must stay as it is.

Consider this, suppose we have only x-y=6, and I tell you that y is negative would you rewrite the equation as x-(-y)=6?

Hope it's clear.
User avatar
WholeLottaLove
Joined: 13 May 2013
Last visit: 13 Jan 2014
Posts: 301
Own Kudos:
640
 [1]
Given Kudos: 134
Posts: 301
Kudos: 640
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
If x + |x| + y = 7 and x + |y| - y =6 , then x + y =

x>0, y>0

x + (x) + y = 7
2x+y=7

x + |y| - y = 6
x + y - y = 6
x=6

2x+y=7
2(6)+y=7
y=-5

INVALID as 6>0 but -5 is not > 0

x>0, y<0

x + (x) + y = 7
2x+y=7

x + |y| - y = 6
x + (-y) - y = 6
x - 2y = 6
x = 6+2y

2(6+2y) + y = 7
12+4y+y=7
12+5y=7
5y+-5
y=-1

2x+y=7
2x + (-1) = 7
2x - 1 = 7
2x=8
x=4

VALID as 4>0 and -1<0

therefore;

x+y = (4)+(-1) = 3

(A)
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,441
Own Kudos:
79,397
 [2]
Given Kudos: 484
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,441
Kudos: 79,397
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hussain15
If x + |x| + y = 7 and x + |y| - y =6 , then x + y =

A. 3
B. 4
C. 5
D. 6
E. 9


In such a question, you can use some brute force and get to the answer too. How long it takes depends on how quickly you observe the little things.

x + |x| + y = 7
x + |y| - y =6

Both equations yield about the same result though in one y is positive and in the other it is negative. |x| and |y| are positive and assuming x is positive, a negative y would pull down the first equation and pump up the second one to give almost equal values. The difference is very small also signifies that the negative variable might have a very small value.
Since the options give the value of x + y as 3/4/5... etc, it is likely that we are dealing with small number pairs such as (4, 2), (3, 2), (4, 1) etc.
Since the first equation has 7 as the result, both variables will not be even.
A couple of quick iterations brought me to (4, -1).
So x + y = 3
User avatar
sagar2911
Joined: 08 Sep 2012
Last visit: 17 Aug 2019
Posts: 52
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 252
Location: India
Concentration: Social Entrepreneurship, General Management
WE:Engineering (Finance: Investment Banking)
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VeritasPrepKarishma
Hussain15
If x + |x| + y = 7 and x + |y| - y =6 , then x + y =

A. 3
B. 4
C. 5
D. 6
E. 9


In such a question, you can use some brute force and get to the answer too. How long it takes depends on how quickly you observe the little things.

x + |x| + y = 7
x + |y| - y =6

Both equations yield about the same result though in one y is positive and in the other it is negative. |x| and |y| are positive and assuming x is positive, a negative y would pull down the first equation and pump up the second one to give almost equal values. The difference is very small also signifies that the negative variable might have a very small value.
Since the options give the value of x + y as 3/4/5... etc, it is likely that we are dealing with small number pairs such as (4, 2), (3, 2), (4, 1) etc.
Since the first equation has 7 as the result, both variables will not be even.
A couple of quick iterations brought me to (4, -1).
So x + y = 3

Hi Karishma,

I tried another approach, but got stuck - can you hep me solve by this method?
x + |x| + y = 7 => x + y = 7 - |x| => Whatever be the value of x, |x| will be always non-negative => x + y has to be less than 7 => This eliminates option E
x + |y| - y = 6 => Now, if y is positive, then this equation becomes x = 6 => on substituting in above eqn, we get y = -5 => x+y = 1 => Not present in any of the options => y is negative => x - y - y = 6 => x - 2y = 6 => x = 6 + 2y
Now x + y = 7 - |6 + 2y|
If we take y = -1, we get x + y = 3 = Option A
If we take y = -2, we get x + y = 5 = Option C
I am getting both options here - where am I going wrong here? Or this approach incorrect?
User avatar
ENGRTOMBA2018
Joined: 20 Mar 2014
Last visit: 01 Dec 2021
Posts: 2,319
Own Kudos:
3,890
 [2]
Given Kudos: 816
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.7
WE:Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)
Products:
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
Posts: 2,319
Kudos: 3,890
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sagar2911


Hi Karishma,

I tried another approach, but got stuck - can you hep me solve by this method?
x + |x| + y = 7 => x + y = 7 - |x| => Whatever be the value of x, |x| will be always non-negative => x + y has to be less than 7 => This eliminates option E
x + |y| - y = 6 => Now, if y is positive, then this equation becomes x = 6 => on substituting in above eqn, we get y = -5 => x+y = 1 => Not present in any of the options => y is negative => x - y - y = 6 => x - 2y = 6 => x = 6 + 2y
Now x + y = 7 - |6 + 2y|
If we take y = -1, we get x + y = 3 = Option A
If we take y = -2, we get x + y = 5 = Option C
I am getting both options here - where am I going wrong here? Or this approach incorrect?

Let me try to answer.

You are making a mistake with using |6+2y|

After you get x=6+2y and substitute in equation (1), you get 6+2y+|6+2y|+y=7 ---->6+3y+|6+2y| = 7 ---> 3y+|6+2y| = 1. Now the point to note is that the 'nature' of |6+2y| changes at y=-3 and thus you need to evaluate |6+2y| for values smaller than -3 and for values greater than -3.

You have already assumed that y<0 in order to get x=6+2y, so your ranges to consider become -3 \(\le\)q y < 0 and y < -3

Case 1: -3 \(\le\) y < 0, giving you |6+2y| \(\geq\) 0 ----> 3y+|6+2y| = 1 ---> 3y+6+2y = 1 ---> 5y=-5 ---> y=-1. Acceptable value giving you x=6+2y = 4 --> x+y = 3

Case 2: y<-3 ---> |6+2y| = -(6+2y) ---> 3y+|6+2y| = 1 ---> 3y-6-2y = 1 ---> y=7 this contradicts the assumption that y<-3 , making this out of scope.

Thus the only value of x+y = 3.
User avatar
sagar2911
Joined: 08 Sep 2012
Last visit: 17 Aug 2019
Posts: 52
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 252
Location: India
Concentration: Social Entrepreneurship, General Management
WE:Engineering (Finance: Investment Banking)
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Engr2012
sagar2911


Hi Karishma,

I tried another approach, but got stuck - can you hep me solve by this method?
x + |x| + y = 7 => x + y = 7 - |x| => Whatever be the value of x, |x| will be always non-negative => x + y has to be less than 7 => This eliminates option E
x + |y| - y = 6 => Now, if y is positive, then this equation becomes x = 6 => on substituting in above eqn, we get y = -5 => x+y = 1 => Not present in any of the options => y is negative => x - y - y = 6 => x - 2y = 6 => x = 6 + 2y
Now x + y = 7 - |6 + 2y|
If we take y = -1, we get x + y = 3 = Option A
If we take y = -2, we get x + y = 5 = Option C
I am getting both options here - where am I going wrong here? Or this approach incorrect?

Let me try to answer.

You are making a mistake with using |6+2y|

After you get x=6+2y and substitute in equation (1), you get 6+2y+|6+2y|+y=7 ---->6+3y+|6+2y| = 7 ---> 3y+|6+2y| = 1. Now the point to note is that the 'nature' of |6+2y| changes at y=-3 and thus you need to evaluate |6+2y| for values smaller than -3 and for values greater than -3.

You have already assumed that y<0 in order to get x=6+2y, so your ranges to consider become -3 \(\le\)q y < 0 and y < -3

Case 1: -3 \(\le\) y < 0, giving you |6+2y| \(\geq\) 0 ----> 3y+|6+2y| = 1 ---> 3y+6+2y = 1 ---> 5y=-5 ---> y=-1. Acceptable value giving you x=6+2y = 4 --> x+y = 3

Case 2: y<-3 ---> |6+2y| = -(6+2y) ---> 3y+|6+2y| = 1 ---> 3y-6-2y = 1 ---> y=7 this contradicts the assumption that y<-3 , making this out of scope.

Thus the only value of x+y = 3.

Excellent. Thank you dude! :)
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,960
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,960
Kudos: 1,117
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109785 posts
Tuck School Moderator
853 posts