Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 17:54 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 17:54
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Smita04
Joined: 29 Nov 2011
Last visit: 29 Oct 2012
Posts: 65
Own Kudos:
1,514
 [124]
Given Kudos: 37
Posts: 65
Kudos: 1,514
 [124]
8
Kudos
Add Kudos
116
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,785
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,853
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,785
Kudos: 810,870
 [43]
15
Kudos
Add Kudos
28
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Dreaming
Joined: 17 Sep 2011
Last visit: 19 Nov 2015
Posts: 158
Own Kudos:
248
 [5]
Given Kudos: 34
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
Schools: ISB '15
GMAT 1: 720 Q48 V40
GPA: 3.18
WE:Supply Chain Management (Manufacturing)
Products:
Schools: ISB '15
GMAT 1: 720 Q48 V40
Posts: 158
Kudos: 248
 [5]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,785
Own Kudos:
810,870
 [1]
Given Kudos: 105,853
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,785
Kudos: 810,870
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bumping for review and further discussion*. Get a kudos point for an alternative solution!

*New project from GMAT Club!!! Check HERE

All DS Functions and Custom Characters questions: search.php?search_id=tag&tag_id=40
All PS Functions and Custom Characters questions: search.php?search_id=tag&tag_id=61
avatar
kpali
Joined: 22 May 2013
Last visit: 20 Dec 2014
Posts: 35
Own Kudos:
35
 [2]
Given Kudos: 10
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GPA: 3.9
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Posts: 35
Kudos: 35
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Smita04
‎[x] denotes to be the least integer no less than x. Is [2d] = 0?

(1) [d] = 0
(2) [3d] = 0

I did not jump into the equations, but tried to solve logically. Please let me know if wrong.

We need to find out if [2d] = 0?

Again its a YES or NO, question, getting Either in the statements will help us to the solutions.

(1) [d] = 0

Now according to the question [x] = integer no less than x

Hence, considering two extremes for evaluating this particular case, Lets take
[0.12] = 0 as well as [0.99] = 0 (both are valid for [d] =0)

therefore, [2d], i.e. taking the same values as above
[0.24] = 0, but [1.98] = 1
so we cant say most definitely that [2d] =0

Not Sufficient.

(2) [3d] = 0

again considering etremes here,

lets take
Minimum value => 3d = 0.12 (you can take less then this as well, i am just taking this for easy divisibility purpose, as anything less then 0.12 will also result in 0 we already know that)
and
Maximum value => 3d = 0.99
[3d] = 0 holds for both the values.

now, [2d]
minimum= [0.8] =0
maximum= [0.22] =0

hence, no matter what range we take for 3d, 2d will always be less then that.
Thus, if [3d]= 0, holds true, then [2d] =0 should hold true as well.

Hence, B
avatar
kpali
Joined: 22 May 2013
Last visit: 20 Dec 2014
Posts: 35
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 10
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GPA: 3.9
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Posts: 35
Kudos: 35
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Bumping for review and further discussion*. Get a kudos point for an alternative solution!

*New project from GMAT Club!!! Check HERE

All DS Functions and Custom Characters questions: search.php?search_id=tag&tag_id=40
All PS Functions and Custom Characters questions: search.php?search_id=tag&tag_id=61

Hi Bunuel,

Please let me know if the above approach is correct?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,785
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,853
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,785
Kudos: 810,870
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
kpali
Smita04
‎[x] denotes to be the least integer no less than x. Is [2d] = 0?

(1) [d] = 0
(2) [3d] = 0

I did not jump into the equations, but tried to solve logically. Please let me know if wrong.

We need to find out if [2d] = 0?

Again its a YES or NO, question, getting Either in the statements will help us to the solutions.

(1) [d] = 0

Now according to the question [x] = integer no less than x

Hence, considering two extremes for evaluating this particular case, Lets take
[0.12] = 0 as well as [0.99] = 0 (both are valid for [d] =0)

therefore, [2d], i.e. taking the same values as above
[0.24] = 0, but [1.98] = 1
so we cant say most definitely that [2d] =0

Not Sufficient.

(2) [3d] = 0

again considering etremes here,

lets take
Minimum value => 3d = 0.12 (you can take less then this as well, i am just taking this for easy divisibility purpose, as anything less then 0.12 will also result in 0 we already know that)
and
Maximum value => 3d = 0.99
[3d] = 0 holds for both the values.

now, [2d]
minimum= [0.8] =0
maximum= [0.22] =0

hence, no matter what range we take for 3d, 2d will always be less then that.
Thus, if [3d]= 0, holds true, then [2d] =0 should hold true as well.

Hence, B

No, that's not correct. Function [] rounds UP a number to the nearest integer, thus [0.12] = 1, not 0 and [0.99] = 1, not 1.
User avatar
sunaimshadmani
Joined: 05 Jun 2014
Last visit: 12 Apr 2019
Posts: 55
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 51
GMAT 1: 630 Q42 V35
GMAT 1: 630 Q42 V35
Posts: 55
Kudos: 89
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Meaning that even -0.99 will round UP to 0 and not -1??
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,785
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,853
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,785
Kudos: 810,870
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sunaimshadmani
Meaning that even -0.99 will round UP to 0 and not -1??

Yes. The function rounds UP a number to the nearest integer. The nearest integer greater than -0.99 is 0, thus [-0.99] = 0.

Check other Rounding Functions Questions in our Special Questions Directory.

Hope it helps.
avatar
dineshril
Joined: 27 Apr 2015
Last visit: 14 Oct 2018
Posts: 35
Own Kudos:
57
 [1]
Given Kudos: 238
GMAT 1: 370 Q29 V13
Products:
GMAT 1: 370 Q29 V13
Posts: 35
Kudos: 57
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Smita04
‎[x] denotes to be the least integer no less than x. Is [2d] = 0?

(1) [d] = 0
(2) [3d] = 0


Given [x] LI no less than x i.e [x]>=x
Find Is [2d]=0

Now [2d]=0 possible if 2d satisfies the inequality/range -1<2d<=0 ---equ(a)

Statement 1 [d]=0
=> Since [d]=0 so d lies in -1<d<=0
=> Multiplying the above inequality by 2 we have -2<2d<=0. So this range makes 2 cases
=> Case 1 When -2<2d<=-1 then [2d]=-1
=> Case 2 When -1<2d<=0 then [2d]=0
=> Since no unique sol. So NOT sufficient

Statement 2 [3d]=0
Since [3d]=0 so 3d lies in -1<3d<=0
=> Multiplying the above inequality by 2/3 we have -2/3<2d<=0.
=> So the above range satisfy equ (a)
=> Therefore [2d]=0
=> Since unique sol. So SUFFICIENT

Therefore "B"

Thanks
avatar
DrMudassir
Joined: 03 Sep 2018
Last visit: 01 Nov 2021
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 146
Posts: 8
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
kpali
Smita04
‎[x] denotes to be the least integer no less than x. Is [2d] = 0?

(1) [d] = 0
(2) [3d] = 0

I did not jump into the equations, but tried to solve logically. Please let me know if wrong.

We need to find out if [2d] = 0?

Again its a YES or NO, question, getting Either in the statements will help us to the solutions.

(1) [d] = 0

Now according to the question [x] = integer no less than x

Hence, considering two extremes for evaluating this particular case, Lets take
[0.12] = 0 as well as [0.99] = 0 (both are valid for [d] =0)

therefore, [2d], i.e. taking the same values as above
[0.24] = 0, but [1.98] = 1
so we cant say most definitely that [2d] =0

Not Sufficient.

(2) [3d] = 0

again considering etremes here,

lets take
Minimum value => 3d = 0.12 (you can take less then this as well, i am just taking this for easy divisibility purpose, as anything less then 0.12 will also result in 0 we already know that)
and
Maximum value => 3d = 0.99
[3d] = 0 holds for both the values.

now, [2d]
minimum= [0.8] =0
maximum= [0.22] =0

hence, no matter what range we take for 3d, 2d will always be less then that.
Thus, if [3d]= 0, holds true, then [2d] =0 should hold true as well.

Hence, B

No, that's not correct. Function [] rounds UP a number to the nearest integer, thus [0.12] = 1, not 0 and [0.99] = 1, not 1.



* Sorry but i still think, least number less than x means 0 for 0.12, and not 1

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,785
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,853
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,785
Kudos: 810,870
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
DrMudassir



* Sorry but i still think, least number less than x means 0 for 0.12, and not 1

Posted from my mobile device

You are wrong. We are given that ‎[x] denotes to be the least integer no less than x.

What is [0.12] ? What is the least integer no less than x? 0 is less than 0.12. 1 is the least integer no less than 0.12.
User avatar
DanTheGMATMan
Joined: 02 Oct 2015
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 380
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 9
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 380
Kudos: 267
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
[b] equates the least integer greater than or equal to b, which in everyday language means that [b] rounds UP to the next integer, if it is not an integer. For example, [2.5] = 3.

So the question is, is -1< \(2b\leq{0}\)

1) -1 < \(b\leq{0}\)

Not sufficient, because 2b could move to be less than -1, with 2 increasing the magnitude of the term.

2) -1 < \(3b\leq{0}\)

If 3b is between -1 and 0, then B itself has to be between -1 and 0. Dividing out the 3 would only move it closer to 0

Sufficient

B
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,964
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,964
Kudos: 1,117
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109785 posts
498 posts
212 posts