This problem rewards students who remember that all multiples of the integer x
will be x
units apart. Statement (1) gives that y
is divisible by x−1
. This can be proven insufficient with a quick number picking thought experiment. If x=4
is it possible to have a number that is divisible by both x=4
and x−1=3
? If you multiply 3 and 4 together to get 12, the answer is yes, there are an infinite number of ways to have a value of y
that is divisible by both x
and x−1
.
Conversely, there are also an infinite number of integers that are divisible by x−1
that aren't divisible by x
. In the case of x−1=3
, 6, 9, and 21 are all divisible by 3 but aren't divisible by 4. Since this means you can get both a "yes" and a "no" based on the information given in statement (1), statement (1) is insufficient. Eliminate (A) and (D).
Statement (2) gives that y=x!+x−1
. This may seem to give information similar to what is given in statement (1), but it is much more sufficient.
Remember that x!
can be written as "(x)(x−1)(x−2)(x−3).....(2)(1)
".
This means that for any given value for x
where x
is an integer greater than 1, that x!
must be divisible by x−1
as well as x
.
If you add x−1
to x!
, you get a number that is divisible by x−1
but that cannot be divisible by x
. To understand this, it helps to pick numbers.
If x=4
, then x!=(4)(3)(2)=24
. If you add x−1=3
to that, you get 27, which is still divisible by 3 but that isn't divisible by 4.
This is because multiples of the same number are evenly spaced - all multiples of 4 will be 4 apart, all multiples of 3 will be 3 apart, etc. So for whatever number you pick for x
, if you add x−1
you will always get a number that is 1 less than a multiple of x
, which means that y
can never be divisible by x
.
This means that statement (2) gives you a consistent "no" and is sufficient. Answer choice (B) is correct.