Last visit was: 25 Apr 2026, 15:14 It is currently 25 Apr 2026, 15:14
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,771
Own Kudos:
51,923
 [8]
Given Kudos: 6,335
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,771
Kudos: 51,923
 [8]
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 11,229
Own Kudos:
45,020
 [3]
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,229
Kudos: 45,020
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Gmat4321prep
Joined: 12 Apr 2020
Last visit: 19 Feb 2021
Posts: 3
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 11,229
Own Kudos:
45,020
 [1]
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,229
Kudos: 45,020
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Gmat4321prep
Hi..
If in this question in the second part the height was given 10 instead of 5 the answer would be C or E in that case?
If it’s 10 we could take the ratio and then breadth would become 8..
Is that right?
Kindly clear this doubt

Posted from my mobile device


Hi
You have to have the height same in both the statements
You cannot have 5 as height in statement I and 10 in statement II.
avatar
tangokilo23
Joined: 06 Mar 2021
Last visit: 25 Jun 2023
Posts: 40
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 152
Location: India
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel ExpertsGlobal VeritasKarishma Kindly clear this doubt.

I got this question wrong because I took a risky assumption. But it's better to clear this doubt for the future.

Logically Length is considered to be longer than breadth in such figures. And hence I considered statement 1 to be sufficient. Because I assume that the breadth would have to be less than or equal to 6 (<=6) as it should not be greater than the length.

Is this kind of assumption unwarranted?

Thankyou.
User avatar
AnirudhaS
User avatar
LBS Moderator
Joined: 30 Oct 2019
Last visit: 25 Jun 2024
Posts: 778
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,575
Posts: 778
Kudos: 887
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
tangokilo23
Bunuel ExpertsGlobal VeritasKarishma Kindly clear this doubt.

I got this question wrong because I took a risky assumption. But it's better to clear this doubt for the future.

Logically Length is considered to be longer than breadth in such figures. And hence I considered statement 1 to be sufficient. Because I assume that the breadth would have to be less than or equal to 6 (<=6) as it should not be greater than the length.

Is this kind of assumption unwarranted?

Thankyou.
You should think in terms of fitting the rod in a 3D box.
Individually if any two out of the length, breadth or height is given, then it is not sufficient to determine the how big the 3D box is, and consequently you cannot reach to the answer.
So really it does not matter if length is bigger than height or vice-versa.
Hope this helps.
avatar
tangokilo23
Joined: 06 Mar 2021
Last visit: 25 Jun 2023
Posts: 40
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 152
Location: India
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AnirudhaS
tangokilo23
Bunuel ExpertsGlobal VeritasKarishma Kindly clear this doubt.

I got this question wrong because I took a risky assumption. But it's better to clear this doubt for the future.

Logically Length is considered to be longer than breadth in such figures. And hence I considered statement 1 to be sufficient. Because I assume that the breadth would have to be less than or equal to 6 (<=6) as it should not be greater than the length.

Is this kind of assumption unwarranted?

Thankyou.
You should think in terms of fitting the rod in a 3D box.
Individually if any two out of the length, breadth or height is given, then it is not sufficient to determine the how big the 3D box is, and consequently you cannot reach to the answer.
So really it does not matter if length is bigger than height or vice-versa.
Hope this helps.

Thank you so much for the effort,
Although, I am not concerned about Length vs Height.
I am saying that Given the L and H, I am introducing B and B shall be limited to <=L

As per the formula sq. root(L^2+B^2+H^2). L is given, H is given, B is Limited. Hence, MAX VALUE POSSIBLE TO CALCULATE, SUFFICIENT.

I know it's a leap. But still want to confirm it. Since technically it should be the assumption. I think the questions language kind of hints at this assumption.

Bunuel, ExpertsGlobal
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,441
Own Kudos:
79,413
 [2]
Given Kudos: 485
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,441
Kudos: 79,413
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
tangokilo23
Bunuel ExpertsGlobal VeritasKarishma Kindly clear this doubt.

I got this question wrong because I took a risky assumption. But it's better to clear this doubt for the future.

Logically Length is considered to be longer than breadth in such figures. And hence I considered statement 1 to be sufficient. Because I assume that the breadth would have to be less than or equal to 6 (<=6) as it should not be greater than the length.

Is this kind of assumption unwarranted?

Thankyou.

No, I will not assume that length must be greater than the breadth. It is one interpretation of the term "length", but I wouldn't assume that it must hold. In any case, even if I do know that breadth is less than 6, it could be 1 or 2 or 5 etc. How can we find the maximum length of the rod without an exact value for breadth. The maximum length of the rod will vary as per the breadth of the box.
avatar
tangokilo23
Joined: 06 Mar 2021
Last visit: 25 Jun 2023
Posts: 40
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 152
Location: India
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VeritasKarishma
tangokilo23
Bunuel ExpertsGlobal VeritasKarishma Kindly clear this doubt.

I got this question wrong because I took a risky assumption. But it's better to clear this doubt for the future.

Logically Length is considered to be longer than breadth in such figures. And hence I considered statement 1 to be sufficient. Because I assume that the breadth would have to be less than or equal to 6 (<=6) as it should not be greater than the length.

Is this kind of assumption unwarranted?

Thankyou.

No, I will not assume that length must be greater than the breadth. It is one interpretation of the term "length", but I wouldn't assume that it must hold. In any case, even if I do know that breadth is less than 6, it could be 1 or 2 or 5 etc. How can we find the maximum length of the rod without an exact value for breadth. The maximum length of the rod will vary as per the breadth of the box.

Wow!, Thank you so much. I never thought from that point of view.
It is much clearer now. Appreciate it.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109830 posts
498 posts
212 posts