Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
The question doesn't make sense. A triangle cannot have the side lengths provided in Statement 1, because the sum of any two sides of a triangle must always exceed the third side. But x + 2x is not greater than 3x. So from Statement 1 the triangle cannot exist. Statements 1 and 2 are also inconsistent; they can't both be true. So if the question has been reproduced correctly, there are several things deeply wrong with it.
Statement 1: Only having angles isn't sufficient to find the area because of similar triangles. Insufficient
Statement 2 : Area = 0.5 * base * height = 0.5 * 4 * 3 =6 Sufficient
Ans should be b then
Posted from my mobile device
Show more
In the statement 2, you are assuming that angle c is 90 degree angle. But it might be 89 degrees or 91 degrees - we don't know. For that reason statement 2 alone is insufficient.
Taking both statements together: I) sum of angles is x+2x+3x = 180 --> x=30 --> thus, we know that angle c is a right angle. II) side a = 4, side b = 3 Thus, the area is 0.5*3*4=6
The question still makes no sense. If you use both Statements, for one thing, a is the smallest angle of the triangle, so it must be opposite the shortest side. But according to Statement 2, it's not opposite the shortest side. And for another thing, using Statement 1, we must have a 30-60-90 triangle. The sides of a 30-60-90 triangle are in a 1 to √3 to 2 ratio. So it's impossible for one side to be 3 and another to be 4, as Statement 2 claims. So the two statements make no sense when you consider them together, since they're describing a triangle that can't exist.
The question still makes no sense. If you use both Statements, for one thing, a is the smallest angle of the triangle, so it must be opposite the shortest side. But according to Statement 2, it's not opposite the shortest side. And for another thing, using Statement 1, we must have a 30-60-90 triangle. The sides of a 30-60-90 triangle are in a 1 to √3 to 2 ratio. So it's impossible for one side to be 3 and another to be 4, as Statement 2 claims. So the two statements make no sense when you consider them together, since they're describing a triangle that can't exist.
Show more
Aha, haven't actually thought of that - also can't believe that it is wrong in the book. Thank you very much for checking!
Although I marked the "correct" choice, I have noticed something strange about this question, so I decided to share it with everyone.
The question asks the value of area of the triangle.
So, per statement one: (1) We can get the value of each of the angles by x+2x+3x=180 and we get x=180/6=30 degrees. So we have a 30,60,90 degrees triangle. But, as we don't have any info about the lengths of sides we can't calculate the area of triangle.
Now, statement two tells us: (2) that two sides of the triangle are 4 and 3, and the only thing that we can infer is that the third side ranges from 2 to 6. Since we don't have any info about the type of triangle and about the height of the triangle we can't calculate the area.
So, combining statements one and two: (1)+(2) we know that the opposite of side length of a is 4 and the opposite of side length is 3, and the biggest angle in this traingle is angle c, which is 90 degrees, we can infer that 3 and 4 are the legs of right triangle, so the area of triangle will be 3*4/2=6.
However, since we know that we have a 30,60,90 triangle and we also know that the side opposite a is 4 and the side opposite b is 3, and therefore the side opposite to c must be 5, we here violate some of the basic properties of 30,60,90 triangle, which is the opposite side of 30 degree angle is equal to half of the hypotenuse (in this case the hypotenuse can't be 5, it should have been 6). However this can't be true because now 3^2+4^2 = 6^2, which is obviously false. That's why I believe that the statements one and two are inconsistent. So, in reality you can't find the area of the figure which is can't exist.
I think one way to correct this question is to assign the opposite of a to 3√3, and then we will have 30,60,90 triangle with sides 3,3√3 and 6 respectively. Though the area will be 3*√3/2, but it's not really important. All that matters is that the statements are consistent now, and question makes sense.
This Question is Locked Due to Poor Quality
Hi there,
The question you've reached has been archived due to not meeting our community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Looking for better-quality questions? Check out the 'Similar Questions' block below
for a list of similar but high-quality questions.
Want to join other relevant Problem Solving discussions? Visit our Data Sufficiency (DS) Forum
for the most recent and top-quality discussions.