Last visit was: 14 Dec 2024, 21:32 It is currently 14 Dec 2024, 21:32
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Xin Cho
Joined: 29 May 2016
Last visit: 30 Aug 2020
Posts: 102
Own Kudos:
158
 []
Given Kudos: 178
Location: Czech Republic
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V38
GPA: 3.94
WE:Corporate Finance (Finance: Investment Banking)
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V38
Posts: 102
Kudos: 158
 []
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
IanStewart
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Last visit: 13 Dec 2024
Posts: 4,126
Own Kudos:
9,924
 []
Given Kudos: 97
 Q51  V47
Expert reply
Posts: 4,126
Kudos: 9,924
 []
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Xin Cho
Joined: 29 May 2016
Last visit: 30 Aug 2020
Posts: 102
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 178
Location: Czech Republic
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V38
GPA: 3.94
WE:Corporate Finance (Finance: Investment Banking)
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V38
Posts: 102
Kudos: 158
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Trev50
Joined: 22 Jun 2019
Last visit: 13 Dec 2019
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Statement 1: Only having angles isn't sufficient to find the area because of similar triangles.
Insufficient

Statement 2 : Area = 0.5 * base * height = 0.5 * 4 * 3 =6
Sufficient

Ans should be b then

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Xin Cho
Joined: 29 May 2016
Last visit: 30 Aug 2020
Posts: 102
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 178
Location: Czech Republic
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V38
GPA: 3.94
WE:Corporate Finance (Finance: Investment Banking)
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V38
Posts: 102
Kudos: 158
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Trev50
Statement 1: Only having angles isn't sufficient to find the area because of similar triangles.
Insufficient

Statement 2 : Area = 0.5 * base * height = 0.5 * 4 * 3 =6
Sufficient

Ans should be b then

Posted from my mobile device

In the statement 2, you are assuming that angle c is 90 degree angle. But it might be 89 degrees or 91 degrees - we don't know.
For that reason statement 2 alone is insufficient.

Taking both statements together:
I) sum of angles is x+2x+3x = 180 --> x=30 --> thus, we know that angle c is a right angle.
II) side a = 4, side b = 3
Thus, the area is 0.5*3*4=6
User avatar
Staphyk
Joined: 20 Mar 2018
Last visit: 30 Jan 2022
Posts: 468
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 149
Location: Ghana
Concentration: Finance, Statistics
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V39
Products:
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V39
Posts: 468
Kudos: 363
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Answer C
Attachments

File comment: Solution
65522835-7270-4B72-BF06-2C317231E14C.jpeg
65522835-7270-4B72-BF06-2C317231E14C.jpeg [ 565.05 KiB | Viewed 1796 times ]

User avatar
IanStewart
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Last visit: 13 Dec 2024
Posts: 4,126
Own Kudos:
9,924
 []
Given Kudos: 97
 Q51  V47
Expert reply
Posts: 4,126
Kudos: 9,924
 []
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The question still makes no sense. If you use both Statements, for one thing, a is the smallest angle of the triangle, so it must be opposite the shortest side. But according to Statement 2, it's not opposite the shortest side. And for another thing, using Statement 1, we must have a 30-60-90 triangle. The sides of a 30-60-90 triangle are in a 1 to √3 to 2 ratio. So it's impossible for one side to be 3 and another to be 4, as Statement 2 claims. So the two statements make no sense when you consider them together, since they're describing a triangle that can't exist.
User avatar
Xin Cho
Joined: 29 May 2016
Last visit: 30 Aug 2020
Posts: 102
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 178
Location: Czech Republic
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V38
GPA: 3.94
WE:Corporate Finance (Finance: Investment Banking)
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V38
Posts: 102
Kudos: 158
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IanStewart
The question still makes no sense. If you use both Statements, for one thing, a is the smallest angle of the triangle, so it must be opposite the shortest side. But according to Statement 2, it's not opposite the shortest side. And for another thing, using Statement 1, we must have a 30-60-90 triangle. The sides of a 30-60-90 triangle are in a 1 to √3 to 2 ratio. So it's impossible for one side to be 3 and another to be 4, as Statement 2 claims. So the two statements make no sense when you consider them together, since they're describing a triangle that can't exist.

Aha, haven't actually thought of that - also can't believe that it is wrong in the book. Thank you very much for checking!
User avatar
hovhannesmkrtchyan
Joined: 10 Oct 2017
Last visit: 23 Jan 2022
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 166
GMAT 1: 680 Q47 V35
GPA: 3.19
Products:
GMAT 1: 680 Q47 V35
Posts: 16
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Xin Cho
What is the area of the triangle with angles a, b, and c?

(1) a = x, b = 2x, c = 3x
(2) The side opposite a is 4 and the side opposite b is 3.


Source: Nova's GMAT prep course, page 298, exercise 7)


Although I marked the "correct" choice, I have noticed something strange about this question, so I decided to share it with everyone.

The question asks the value of area of the triangle.

So, per statement one:
(1) We can get the value of each of the angles by x+2x+3x=180 and we get x=180/6=30 degrees.
So we have a 30,60,90 degrees triangle. But, as we don't have any info about the lengths of sides we can't calculate the area of triangle.

Now, statement two tells us:
(2) that two sides of the triangle are 4 and 3, and the only thing that we can infer is that the third side ranges from 2 to 6.
Since we don't have any info about the type of triangle and about the height of the triangle we can't calculate the area.

So, combining statements one and two:
(1)+(2) we know that the opposite of side length of a is 4 and the opposite of side length is 3, and the biggest angle in this traingle is angle c, which is 90 degrees, we can infer that 3 and 4 are the legs of right triangle, so the area of triangle will be 3*4/2=6.

However, since we know that we have a 30,60,90 triangle and we also know that the side opposite a is 4 and the side opposite b is 3, and therefore the side
opposite to c must be 5, we here violate some of the basic properties of 30,60,90 triangle, which is the opposite side of 30 degree angle is equal to half of the hypotenuse (in this case the hypotenuse can't be 5, it should have been 6). However this can't be true because now 3^2+4^2 = 6^2, which is obviously false.
That's why I believe that the statements one and two are inconsistent. So, in reality you can't find the area of the figure which is can't exist.

I think one way to correct this question is to assign the opposite of a to 3√3, and then we will have 30,60,90 triangle with sides 3,3√3 and 6 respectively. Though the area will be 3*√3/2, but it's not really important. All that matters is that the statements are consistent now, and question makes sense.

This Question is Locked Due to Poor Quality
Hi there,
The question you've reached has been archived due to not meeting our community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Looking for better-quality questions? Check out the 'Similar Questions' block below for a list of similar but high-quality questions.
Want to join other relevant Problem Solving discussions? Visit our Data Sufficiency (DS) Forum for the most recent and top-quality discussions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderator:
Math Expert
97877 posts