Hi gullyboy09,You're absolutely right to push on this. GMATinsight's line "we're left with one equation in x,
hence we have the value" skips a real step, and your instinct is correct: combining the statements
does produce a quadratic in x. So let's actually solve it and see what happens.
Writing a = x/100, the two statements give two expressions for the markup S/C:
- From (1): S/C = (1+a)/(1-a)
- From (2): S/C = (1 + a/2)/(1 - 5a/4)
Setting them equal and cross-multiplying collapses to:
3a2 - a = 0 -> a(3a - 1) = 0
So the roots are a =
0 and a =
1/3. Two roots - exactly as you suspected.
Why only one survivesHere a =
0 means x =
0, which is a degenerate case: a "
0% discount giving
0% profit" describes no actual discount scenario at all, so x =
0 isn't a valid value for the situation the problem sets up. We discard it.
That leaves the single valid root a =
1/3, i.e. x =
100/3. Plugging back:
S/C = (1 +
1/3)/(1 -
1/3) = (
4/3)/(
2/3) =
2So the no-discount profit is a definite
100%.
The takeawayYour worry was the right one - a quadratic
can leave you with
0,
1, or
2 valid answers, and you should always check. The reason this question is
sufficient (answer
C) isn't that the equation is automatically linear; it's that after solving, only
one root is admissible. Combining the statements pins x down to a unique meaningful value, which is exactly what sufficiency requires.
Answer: Cgullyboy09
Hi
GMATinsight, it will be a quadratic in x, shouldn't we solve the equation to see if there is one value of x exist, or two, or zero? How did we arrive at that it will have unique solution.