Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2601:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2512:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
May 0111:00 AM PDT
-12:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
18 Apr 2023, 11:39
Kudos
Bookmarks
The following appeared in an article in a health–and–fitness magazine:
“Laboratory studies show that Saluda Natural Spring Water contains several of the minerals necessary for good health and that it is completely free of bacteria. Residents of Saluda, the small town where the water is bottled, are hospitalized less frequently than the national average. Even though Saluda Natural Spring Water may seem expensive, drinking it instead of tap water is a wise investment in good health.”
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counter examples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.
Analysis:
The argument claims that while expensive drinking Saluda Natural Spring Water instead of tap water is a wise investment in good health. The conclusion of the argument is based on the premise that laboratory studies show that the water contains several minerals necessary for good health and is free of bacteria and that the residents of Saluda are hospitalized less frequently than the national average. However, the conclusion of the argument is based on assumptions for which there is no clear evidence. Hence, the argument is unconvincing and has several flaws.
First, the argument readily assumes that the water is the source of the less frequent hospitalizations of the residents of Saluda. However, it fails to mention other factors, which could affect the frequency of hospitalization. For example, the residents could have access to cleaner and fresher food and thus impacting their health and their rate of hospitalization. Also, the author fails to mention the quality of air and pollution levels in the area. Both of which could influence the health of the residents.
Second, the argument could have been much clearer if it provided information on the terrain of the town. In fact, it is not at all clear if the terrain of Saluda requires more movement on foot rather than other modes of transportation which would impact the overall strength of the bodies of residents of Saluda and thus contribute to their overall health.
Lastly, the argument fails to mention one of the key factors, on the basis of which it could be evaluated, namely if residents of Saluda have access to and are able to afford the water as Saluda Natural Spring Water is expensive. If residents are unable to drink this water, then the lower frequency of hospitalization of the residents in comparison to the national average must be due to another factor.
Without this information, the argument is unsubstantiated and open to debate.
“Laboratory studies show that Saluda Natural Spring Water contains several of the minerals necessary for good health and that it is completely free of bacteria. Residents of Saluda, the small town where the water is bottled, are hospitalized less frequently than the national average. Even though Saluda Natural Spring Water may seem expensive, drinking it instead of tap water is a wise investment in good health.”
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counter examples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.
Analysis:
The argument claims that while expensive drinking Saluda Natural Spring Water instead of tap water is a wise investment in good health. The conclusion of the argument is based on the premise that laboratory studies show that the water contains several minerals necessary for good health and is free of bacteria and that the residents of Saluda are hospitalized less frequently than the national average. However, the conclusion of the argument is based on assumptions for which there is no clear evidence. Hence, the argument is unconvincing and has several flaws.
First, the argument readily assumes that the water is the source of the less frequent hospitalizations of the residents of Saluda. However, it fails to mention other factors, which could affect the frequency of hospitalization. For example, the residents could have access to cleaner and fresher food and thus impacting their health and their rate of hospitalization. Also, the author fails to mention the quality of air and pollution levels in the area. Both of which could influence the health of the residents.
Second, the argument could have been much clearer if it provided information on the terrain of the town. In fact, it is not at all clear if the terrain of Saluda requires more movement on foot rather than other modes of transportation which would impact the overall strength of the bodies of residents of Saluda and thus contribute to their overall health.
Lastly, the argument fails to mention one of the key factors, on the basis of which it could be evaluated, namely if residents of Saluda have access to and are able to afford the water as Saluda Natural Spring Water is expensive. If residents are unable to drink this water, then the lower frequency of hospitalization of the residents in comparison to the national average must be due to another factor.
Without this information, the argument is unsubstantiated and open to debate.
19 Apr 2023, 21:05
Kudos
Bookmarks
AWA Score: 5.5 - 6 out of 6
Coherence and Connectivity: 5.5/6
The essay is coherent and well-organized. The writer maintains a clear line of reasoning throughout the essay and effectively connects the ideas with transitional phrases. The essay also appropriately responds to the prompt and addresses the main points of the argument.
Word structure: 6/6
The essay is well-written, with proper word usage, appropriate vocabulary, and sentence structure. The writer demonstrates an excellent command of the English language.
Paragraph structure and formation: 6/6
The essay is divided into three well-structured paragraphs, each focusing on a particular flaw in the argument. Each paragraph has a clear topic sentence, supporting evidence, and a concluding sentence that effectively summarizes the main point.
Language and Grammar: 6/6
The essay is written with good grammar, correct use of punctuation, and accurate sentence structure. The writer uses a variety of sentence types to keep the essay interesting and engaging to read.
Vocabulary and Word Expression: 5.5/6
The writer uses appropriate vocabulary and word choice to convey their argument effectively. However, some minor improvements could be made to make the language more precise and specific.
Overall, the essay is well-written and effectively addresses the flaws in the argument. It is well-structured, coherent, and shows a good command of the English language. The essay could be improved by incorporating more precise and specific language.
Coherence and Connectivity: 5.5/6
The essay is coherent and well-organized. The writer maintains a clear line of reasoning throughout the essay and effectively connects the ideas with transitional phrases. The essay also appropriately responds to the prompt and addresses the main points of the argument.
Word structure: 6/6
The essay is well-written, with proper word usage, appropriate vocabulary, and sentence structure. The writer demonstrates an excellent command of the English language.
Paragraph structure and formation: 6/6
The essay is divided into three well-structured paragraphs, each focusing on a particular flaw in the argument. Each paragraph has a clear topic sentence, supporting evidence, and a concluding sentence that effectively summarizes the main point.
Language and Grammar: 6/6
The essay is written with good grammar, correct use of punctuation, and accurate sentence structure. The writer uses a variety of sentence types to keep the essay interesting and engaging to read.
Vocabulary and Word Expression: 5.5/6
The writer uses appropriate vocabulary and word choice to convey their argument effectively. However, some minor improvements could be made to make the language more precise and specific.
Overall, the essay is well-written and effectively addresses the flaws in the argument. It is well-structured, coherent, and shows a good command of the English language. The essay could be improved by incorporating more precise and specific language.
Chimoma
Moderator:
