Last visit was: 30 Apr 2026, 04:57 It is currently 30 Apr 2026, 04:57
Home
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
TheMechanic
User avatar
Joined: 19 Oct 2012
Last visit: 05 Jul 2018
Posts: 207
Own Kudos:
596
Given Kudos: 103
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
Schools: Anderson '16 Tepper '16 Kelley '16 Jones '16 (S) Carlson '16 ISB '18 (II) Duke '20 (S) McCombs '20 (II)
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V35
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V38
GPA: 3.81
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Schools: Anderson '16 Tepper '16 Kelley '16 Jones '16 (S) Carlson '16 ISB '18 (II) Duke '20 (S) McCombs '20 (II)
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V38
Posts: 207
Kudos: 596
CR Argument Analysis 02 May 2017, 18:50
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This is a question from CR Bible Chapter 2:

Hog farming is known to produce dangerous toxic runoffs which enter surrounding ecosystem and contaminate the environment. Despite this, however, hog farming practices should not be more closely regulated because research has shown there is no better method for dispersing effluent from hog farms.

My quandary is to classify whether the argument is weak or strong. I would request experts to opine more on this.

Thanks in advance.