jessepinkman
Biases aside, Booth is the obvious choice here. Booth is Top 5/M7 while Tuck is a solid Top 9 school, there's a definite prestige/reputation difference between the two. Booth will place marginally better into MBB, especially offices outside of the northeast, and does significantly better in other areas such as Tech.
While Hanover will be cheaper than Chicago, Chicago is a relatively affordable city compared with NYC, SF, and Boston. Additionally you'll have a lot more opportunities within the city of Chicago when it comes to networking, in-year internships, and cultural experiences. I can't speak to the community at Tuck, but the community at Booth is actually quite strong. 65% of us live in a 5 block radius in The Loop and there are tons of opportunities to get close with your classmates and develop strong bonds. If you had a significant scholarship at Tuck, I think this would be a tough decision but given equal scholarship at both I think taking Booth is the easy choice here.
This is patently untrue when it comes to MBB. Tuck routinely places a higher proportion of the class into MBB than Booth does. Class of 2015 and class of 2016 both were approximately 25% to MBB for Tuck. You will receive interviews at either one for MBB. In my class for instance, if you had a pulse and were normal in chats you received an interview invitation from MBB. For instance of our 280 person class, over 110 interviewed with McKinsey on campus. As for being predominately in the Northeast, yes many went to the NYC and Boston offices (two of three hardest MBB offices to get into, in addition to SF). We also sent people in my class alone to MBB in: Washington DC, Atlanta, Houston, Dallas, Chicago, and SF in the U.S. Internationally, we sent a ton internationally as well including off the top of my head: London, Madrid, China, Singapore, and Australia.
So, Tuck places a significantly higher percentage of each class into MBB than Booth, and frankly just as internationally, if not more so.
EDITED TO ADD: I neglected to mention the partner factor. Tuck is quite unique from a partner standpoint as well, Tuck Partners (TPs), are fully integrated into the community. They take classes with us, join and lead clubs, and a number end up working for Tuck or Dartmouth. From an integration standpoint and being tight-knit (in a large part due to our location) Tuck is rather unique among all MBA programs out there. Further, from a closeness / tight-knit perspective, in terms of alumni and community engagement, over 72% of living Tuck alumni donate every year, second place tends to be Stanford GSB, generally in the mid to high-40%s along with SOM. Booth is at 18%. Food for thought.
, thank you for your input.
Tuck sends greater percent of class to consulting (36 vs 28 for the class of 2016), but of course it could be in part due to students preferences (finance is 20% vs 36%), so it is really impossible to understand the real chance of getting into consulting judging by this statistic alone.
Do you have any ideas how to estimate % who get into consulting among those for whom it was 1st priority, not among the full class as in the employment report?
As an insider, could you please also comment on tech sector (it is my plan b). It is generally agreed that Booth is better for tech than Tuck and nobody challenges that. But both schools send 16% of class into tech (see 2016 employment reports). So what is the difference?