Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Verbal trouble on GMAT? Fix it NOW! Join Sunita Singhvi for a focused webinar on actionable strategies to boost your Verbal score and take your performance to the next level.
All widgets are steel. Some widgets are red. Therefore, some steel widgets are not red.
it is mentioned that the conclusion is not "must be true".
can someone explain the reason of why the conclusion cannot be inferred from the above premises?
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
All widgets are steel. Some widgets are red. Therefore, some steel widgets are not red.
it is mentioned that the conclusion is not "must be true".
can someone explain the reason of why the conclusion cannot be inferred from the above premises?
Show more
All widets are steel => all widgets in the discussion are steel widgets. Some widgets are red => some steel widgets are red. Some covers the range (from atleast one to all). So at one extreme, there's atleast one steel widget that is red , and on the other extreme possibility covered by some , all steel widgets are red.
"Some steel widgets are not red " meets the criteria of all conditions excepting the possibilty that all steel widgets could be red. (the second extreme) (if all widgets are red, none of the steel widgets will be not red)
HTH
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.