Last visit was: 24 Apr 2026, 12:11 It is currently 24 Apr 2026, 12:11
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
divhin
Joined: 10 May 2015
Last visit: 20 Jan 2017
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
43
 [1]
Given Kudos: 46
Posts: 7
Kudos: 43
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Kurtosis
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Last visit: 10 Nov 2021
Posts: 1,384
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,228
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 1,384
Kudos: 5,236
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 11,229
Own Kudos:
45,008
 [1]
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,229
Kudos: 45,008
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
divhin
Joined: 10 May 2015
Last visit: 20 Jan 2017
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 46
Posts: 7
Kudos: 43
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Vyshak
divhin
ARGUMENT -
A kayak manufacturer has determined that none of its products is entirely watertight. Therefore, it warns customers
that using the kayaks without adding watertight wax sealant will always result in a capsize.

What are the possible assumptions in this argument?

Premise: Kayak manufacturer has determined that its products are not entirely watertight.

Conclusion: Kayaks without watertight wax sealant will always result in a capsize

Possible Assumptions: 1) If kayaks are not watertight, water enters kayaks and causes capsize. There is no other alternative mechanism that prevents the capsize of Kayaks.
2) Wax sealants can make the kayaks completely watertight.

A pre thought assumption helps us to enhance our understanding of the question and argument. It need not always be similar to the answer choice.

P.S: Can you please post the answer choices along with the OA.


Hi Vyshak! Thanks for the response. I came across this question while learning the concept of assumptions.It does not have options or a correct answer. The assumptions mentioned by the author are below:

Assumption 1: One of the company's kayaks could never stay above water unless it is sealed with watertight wax sealant. [I did not understand this assumption.Can anyone explain?]
Assumption 2: There is no way in which a kayak can resist capsizing if that kayak is not watertight.
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 11,229
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,229
Kudos: 45,008
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
divhin
Vyshak
divhin
ARGUMENT -
A kayak manufacturer has determined that none of its products is entirely watertight. Therefore, it warns customers
that using the kayaks without adding watertight wax sealant will always result in a capsize.

What are the possible assumptions in this argument?

Premise: Kayak manufacturer has determined that its products are not entirely watertight.

Conclusion: Kayaks without watertight wax sealant will always result in a capsize

Possible Assumptions: 1) If kayaks are not watertight, water enters kayaks and causes capsize. There is no other alternative mechanism that prevents the capsize of Kayaks.
2) Wax sealants can make the kayaks completely watertight.

A pre thought assumption helps us to enhance our understanding of the question and argument. It need not always be similar to the answer choice.

P.S: Can you please post the answer choices along with the OA.


Hi Vyshak! Thanks for the response. I came across this question while learning the concept of assumptions.It does not have options or a correct answer. The assumptions mentioned by the author are below:

Assumption 1: One of the company's kayaks could never stay above water unless it is sealed with watertight wax sealant. [I did not understand this assumption.Can anyone explain?]
Assumption 2: There is no way in which a kayak can resist capsizing if that kayak is not watertight.

Assumption 1: One of the company's kayaks could never stay above water unless it is sealed with watertight wax sealant.
Only wax sealant can keep the kayak afloat

this is the same as mentioned above in my earlier post
3) wax sealant is the only way to make kayaks watertight.
User avatar
divhin
Joined: 10 May 2015
Last visit: 20 Jan 2017
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 46
Posts: 7
Kudos: 43
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Chetan2u! Thanks for the response. I did not understand the "one of the boats" part in assumption 1.The argument mentions that all his boats are not water tight.Can we accept an answer option if it states "one of the boats"?
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,425
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,425
Kudos: 1,010
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
504 posts
358 posts