Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Verbal trouble on GMAT? Fix it NOW! Join Sunita Singhvi for a focused webinar on actionable strategies to boost your Verbal score and take your performance to the next level.
I was watching a video by Ron () wherein exactly 1 hour into the video he talks about the usage of it vs that in comparisons. A screenshot has been attached below. There, he gave four examples:
1. The air quality of Los Angeles was higher in 2010 than it was in 1995
2. The air quality of Los Angeles was higher in 2010 than that in 1995
3. The air quality of Los Angeles in 2010 was higher than it was in 1995
4. The air quality of Los Angeles in 2010 was higher than that in 1995
He says that 'it' refers to noun along with the modifiers. 'that' refers to only nouns minus the modifiers.
According to him,
#1 is correct,
#2 is incorrect as 'it' should be used instead of 'that'.
#3 is nonsense as 'it' refers to 'air quality of Los Angeles in 2010'
But in #4, he goes on to say 'that' refers to 'air quality of los angeles' and is thus correct. As per my understanding, 'of Los Angeles' is a modifier and shouldn't be included in the definition of 'that'.
I am confused and need some guidance on 'it', 'that', and 'those' when used in comparisons.
Cheers!
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
But in #4, he goes on to say 'that' refers to 'air quality of los angeles' and is thus correct. As per my understanding, 'of Los Angeles' is a modifier and shouldn't be included in the definition of 'that'.
Cheers!
Show more
these are all correct and THAT refers to the highlighted part:
1. The air quality in 2010 was higher than that in 1995 2. The air quality of Los Angles in 2010 was higher than that in 1995. 3. The air quality of Los Angles in 2010 was higher than that of NewYork in 1995.
in #1, The Air quality in general is discussed. the Author did not mention about the particular zone, state or country.
in #2 here - THAT cannot just modify 'The air quality' because sentence is focused about the air quality of LA not entire America or world. Comparison is between the air quality in two different years but only in LA. This is the reason THAT has to modify NOUN+modifier.
But in #3, it will not be the case as "of NEWYORK' is already present. so THAT will just modify "the Air Quality"
I was watching a video by Ron () wherein exactly 1 hour into the video he talks about the usage of it vs that in comparisons. A screenshot has been attached below. There, he gave four examples:
1. The air quality of Los Angeles was higher in 2010 than it was in 1995
2. The air quality of Los Angeles was higher in 2010 than that in 1995
3. The air quality of Los Angeles in 2010 was higher than it was in 1995
4. The air quality of Los Angeles in 2010 was higher than that in 1995
He says that 'it' refers to noun along with the modifiers. 'that' refers to only nouns minus the modifiers.
According to him,
#1 is correct,
#2 is incorrect as 'it' should be used instead of 'that'.
#3 is nonsense as 'it' refers to 'air quality of Los Angeles in 2010'
But in #4, he goes on to say 'that' refers to 'air quality of los angeles' and is thus correct. As per my understanding, 'of Los Angeles' is a modifier and shouldn't be included in the definition of 'that'.
I am confused and need some guidance on 'it', 'that', and 'those' when used in comparisons.
Cheers!
Show more
Reference to the PM I received..
A quick approach here will be to see if PARALLELISM works in two parts....
1. The air quality of Los Angeles was higher in 2010 than it was in 1995 PARALLELISM is between items before WAS So IT refers to ' the air quality of Los Angeles'... Perfectly fine
2. The air quality of Los Angeles was higher in 2010 than that in 1995 PARALLELISM between items before IN.. Doesn't make sense
3. The air quality of Los Angeles in 2010 was higher than it was in 1995 PARALLELISM is between items before WAS So IT refers to ' the air quality of Los Angeles in 2010'... Illogical
4. The air quality of Los Angeles in 2010 was higher than that in 1995 PARALLELISM between items before IN.. So THAT refers to ' the air quality of Los Angeles'. Perfectly fine.
I was watching a video by Ron () wherein exactly 1 hour into the video he talks about the usage of it vs that in comparisons. A screenshot has been attached below. There, he gave four examples:
1. The air quality of Los Angeles was higher in 2010 than it was in 1995
2. The air quality of Los Angeles was higher in 2010 than that in 1995
3. The air quality of Los Angeles in 2010 was higher than it was in 1995
4. The air quality of Los Angeles in 2010 was higher than that in 1995
He says that 'it' refers to noun along with the modifiers. 'that' refers to only nouns minus the modifiers.
According to him,
#1 is correct,
#2 is incorrect as 'it' should be used instead of 'that'.
#3 is nonsense as 'it' refers to 'air quality of Los Angeles in 2010'
But in #4, he goes on to say 'that' refers to 'air quality of los angeles' and is thus correct. As per my understanding, 'of Los Angeles' is a modifier and shouldn't be included in the definition of 'that'.
I am confused and need some guidance on 'it', 'that', and 'those' when used in comparisons.
Cheers!
Reference to the PM I received..
A quick approach here will be to see if PARALLELISM works in two parts....
1. The air quality of Los Angeles was higher in 2010 than it was in 1995 PARALLELISM is between items before WAS So IT refers to ' the air quality of Los Angeles'... Perfectly fine
2. The air quality of Los Angeles was higher in 2010 than that in 1995 PARALLELISM between items before IN.. Doesn't make sense
3. The air quality of Los Angeles in 2010 was higher than it was in 1995 PARALLELISM is between items before WAS So IT refers to ' the air quality of Los Angeles in 2010'... Illogical
4. The air quality of Los Angeles in 2010 was higher than that in 1995 PARALLELISM between items before IN.. So THAT refers to ' the air quality of Los Angeles'. Perfectly fine.
Wo!! What did you just do? Pretty amazing shortcut.
Let me try this out on other problems and report back to you.
Thanks a ton!
chetan2u
longranger25
Hi,
I was watching a video by Ron () wherein exactly 1 hour into the video he talks about the usage of it vs that in comparisons. A screenshot has been attached below. There, he gave four examples:
1. The air quality of Los Angeles was higher in 2010 than it was in 1995
2. The air quality of Los Angeles was higher in 2010 than that in 1995
3. The air quality of Los Angeles in 2010 was higher than it was in 1995
4. The air quality of Los Angeles in 2010 was higher than that in 1995
He says that 'it' refers to noun along with the modifiers. 'that' refers to only nouns minus the modifiers.
According to him,
#1 is correct,
#2 is incorrect as 'it' should be used instead of 'that'.
#3 is nonsense as 'it' refers to 'air quality of Los Angeles in 2010'
But in #4, he goes on to say 'that' refers to 'air quality of los angeles' and is thus correct. As per my understanding, 'of Los Angeles' is a modifier and shouldn't be included in the definition of 'that'.
I am confused and need some guidance on 'it', 'that', and 'those' when used in comparisons.
Cheers!
Reference to the PM I received..
A quick approach here will be to see if PARALLELISM works in two parts....
1. The air quality of Los Angeles was higher in 2010 than it was in 1995 PARALLELISM is between items before WAS So IT refers to ' the air quality of Los Angeles'... Perfectly fine
2. The air quality of Los Angeles was higher in 2010 than that in 1995 PARALLELISM between items before IN.. Doesn't make sense
3. The air quality of Los Angeles in 2010 was higher than it was in 1995 PARALLELISM is between items before WAS So IT refers to ' the air quality of Los Angeles in 2010'... Illogical
4. The air quality of Los Angeles in 2010 was higher than that in 1995 PARALLELISM between items before IN.. So THAT refers to ' the air quality of Los Angeles'. Perfectly fine.
It works. I have been able to get a lot of questions correctly now. I believe, it is just a combination of knowing the right construction and knowing what needs to be parallel where. Solid post. 10/10. I owe you a treat!
Thanks so much!!
chetan2u
longranger25
Hi,
I was watching a video by Ron () wherein exactly 1 hour into the video he talks about the usage of it vs that in comparisons. A screenshot has been attached below. There, he gave four examples:
1. The air quality of Los Angeles was higher in 2010 than it was in 1995
2. The air quality of Los Angeles was higher in 2010 than that in 1995
3. The air quality of Los Angeles in 2010 was higher than it was in 1995
4. The air quality of Los Angeles in 2010 was higher than that in 1995
He says that 'it' refers to noun along with the modifiers. 'that' refers to only nouns minus the modifiers.
According to him,
#1 is correct,
#2 is incorrect as 'it' should be used instead of 'that'.
#3 is nonsense as 'it' refers to 'air quality of Los Angeles in 2010'
But in #4, he goes on to say 'that' refers to 'air quality of los angeles' and is thus correct. As per my understanding, 'of Los Angeles' is a modifier and shouldn't be included in the definition of 'that'.
I am confused and need some guidance on 'it', 'that', and 'those' when used in comparisons.
Cheers!
Reference to the PM I received..
A quick approach here will be to see if PARALLELISM works in two parts....
1. The air quality of Los Angeles was higher in 2010 than it was in 1995 PARALLELISM is between items before WAS So IT refers to ' the air quality of Los Angeles'... Perfectly fine
2. The air quality of Los Angeles was higher in 2010 than that in 1995 PARALLELISM between items before IN.. Doesn't make sense
3. The air quality of Los Angeles in 2010 was higher than it was in 1995 PARALLELISM is between items before WAS So IT refers to ' the air quality of Los Angeles in 2010'... Illogical
4. The air quality of Los Angeles in 2010 was higher than that in 1995 PARALLELISM between items before IN.. So THAT refers to ' the air quality of Los Angeles'. Perfectly fine.
It works. I have been able to get a lot of questions correctly now. I believe, it is just a combination of knowing the right construction and knowing what needs to be parallel where. Solid post. 10/10. I owe you a treat!
Thanks so much!!
Show more
Happy it helped you
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.