Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more.
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
Verbal trouble on GMAT? Fix it NOW! Join Sunita Singhvi for a focused webinar on actionable strategies to boost your Verbal score and take your performance to the next level.
"Supernovas destroy their immediate environments in vast explosions, but by synthesizing heavy chemical elements, THEY provide the universe with the possibility of biochemistry-based life as we know it."
Can or can- not 'they' point towards 'heavy chemical elements' as the atecedent since it's just after the comma and is touching it.
If not, why not ? Please help me build a thought process for similar questions.
Thanks.
Posted from my mobile device
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
"Supernovas destroy their immediate environments in vast explosions, but by synthesizing heavy chemical elements, THEY provide the universe with the possibility of biochemistry-based life as we know it."
Can or can- not 'they' point towards 'heavy chemical elements' as the atecedent since it's just after the comma and is touching it.
If not, why not ? Please help me build a thought process for similar questions.
"Supernovas destroy their immediate environments in vast explosions, but by synthesizing heavy chemical elements, THEY provide the universe with the possibility of biochemistry-based life as we know it."
Can or can- not 'they' point towards 'heavy chemical elements' as the atecedent since it's just after the comma and is touching it.
If not, why not ? Please help me build a thought process for similar questions.
Thanks Bunuel . I went through the referenced post before posting this question. It didn't clear my confusion regarding the 'heavy chemical elements' antecedent.
First off, let me just past the entire sentence here for reference - "Supernovas destroy their immediate environments in vast explosions, but by synthesizing heavy chemical elements, THEY provide the universe with the possibility of biochemistry-based life as we know it."
"THEY" as highlighted in your post cannot be an antecedent to "heavy chemical elements" simply because "heavy chemical elements" is not the subject of the sentence. All along, we're only talking about what the Supernovas do.
Even after the comma, we're still talking about what the Supernovas accomplish as a by-product of synthesizing heavy chemical elements. So yes, THEY still refers to the Supernovas here.
Hi altairahmad, in case of pronouns, it's not the touch rule (the noun touching the pronoun) that matters.
In case of pronoun ambiguity, application of following rule often comes in handy:
Pronoun-subject in one clause can be presumed to refer to noun-subject of another clause.
altairahmad
"Supernovas destroy their immediate environments in vast explosions, but by synthesizing heavy chemical elements, THEY provide the universe with the possibility of biochemistry-based life as we know it."
Show more
The two clauses here are: i) Supernovas destroy their immediate environments in vast explosions - Supernovas is the noun-subject ii) by synthesizing heavy chemical elements, they provide the universe with the possibility of biochemistry-based life as we know it - they is the pronoun-subject
So, they refers to Supernovas.
Having said that, it's worth noting that pronoun ambiguity should not be the only reason to eliminate an answer choice.
p.s. Our book EducationAisle Sentence Correction Nirvana discusses Pronoun ambiguity, its application and examples in significant detail. If you or someone is interested, PM me your email-id; I can mail the corresponding section.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.