[quote="Bunuel"]Oscar: I have been accused of plagiarizing the work of Ethel Myers in my recent article. But that accusation is unwarranted. Although I admit I used passages from Myers’s book without attribution, Myers gave me permission in private correspondence to do so.
Millie: Myers cannot give you permission to plagiarize. Plagiarism is wrong, not only because it violates author’s rights to their own words, but also because it misleads readers: it is fundamentally a type of lie. A lie is no less a lie if another person agrees to the deception.
Millie uses which one of the following argumentative strategies in contesting Oscar’s position?
(A)
analyzing plagiarism in a way that
undermines Oscar’s position - CORRECT.
(B)
invoking evidence to show that Oscar did quote
Myers’ work without attribution - WRONG. Irrelevant.
(C)
challenging Oscar’s ability to quote Myers’ work without attribution - WRONG. None of that is ascertained.
(D) citing a theory of rights that
prohibits plagiarism and suggesting that Oscar is
committed to that theory - WRONG. Both aspects in red text are wrong.
(E) showing that Oscar’s admission demonstrates his
lack of credibility - WRONG. Out of scope.
Answer A.