Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Join the special YouTube live-stream for selecting the winners of GMAT Club MBA Scholarships sponsored by Juno live. Watch who gets these coveted MBA scholarships offered by GMAT Club and Juno.
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
45%
(medium)
Question Stats:
80%
(01:08)
correct 20%
(03:20)
wrong
based on 5
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Humans evolved from homo sapiens in Europe and homo erectus in Asia. These species shared an identical genetic code yet the tools used by them differed vastly. Therefore historians conclude that the differences in tools was due to the respective requirements for survival of these 2 species.
What do the historians assume in drawing the conclusion?
A. There are more similarities than differences between homo sapiens and homo erectus. B. Homo sapiens who had more easy access to food built tools that did not have the range that the tools built by homo erectus possessed. C. Homo sapiens and homo erectus seldom had any contact with each other. D. Homosapiens couldn't have survived had they used tools similar to the ones used by homo erectus. E. The tools developed in any region are dependent on natural resources such as steel, copper, etc. in that region.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Humans evolved from homo sapiens in Europe and homo erectus in Asia. These species shared an identical genetic code yet the tools used by them differed vastly. Therefore historians conclude that the differences in tools was due to the respective requirements for survival of these 2 species.
What do the historians assume in drawing the conclusion?
A. There are more similarities than differences between homo sapiens and homo erectus. B. Homo sapiens who had more easy access to food built tools that did not have the range that the tools built by homo erectus possessed. C. Homo sapiens and homo erectus seldom had any contact with each other. D. Homosapiens couldn't have survived had they used tools similar to the ones used by homo erectus. E. The tools developed in any region are dependent on natural resources such as steel, copper, etc. in that region.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.