Last visit was: 05 Sep 2026, 03:27 It is currently 05 Sep 2026, 03:27
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
parkhydel
Joined: 03 Jun 2019
Last visit: 04 Feb 2026
Posts: 273
Own Kudos:
25,562
 [42]
Given Kudos: 70
Posts: 273
Kudos: 25,562
 [42]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
38
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 04 Sep 2026
Posts: 16,387
Own Kudos:
53,632
 [2]
Given Kudos: 6,457
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,387
Kudos: 53,632
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Apt0810
Joined: 15 Jul 2018
Last visit: 24 Oct 2020
Posts: 319
Own Kudos:
688
 [1]
Given Kudos: 94
Posts: 319
Kudos: 688
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
bond001
Joined: 26 Oct 2020
Last visit: 11 Oct 2023
Posts: 76
Own Kudos:
56
 [1]
Given Kudos: 232
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V30
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V30
Posts: 76
Kudos: 56
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
statement 1 weakens the statement
statement 2 neither strengthen nor weakens the argument it just provides facts
statement 3 strengthen the argument
statement 4 again the fact irrelevant
Statement 5 does not affect the conclusion in any way
User avatar
zoezhuyan
Joined: 17 Sep 2016
Last visit: 11 Nov 2024
Posts: 378
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 147
Posts: 378
Kudos: 96
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sajjad1994
Official Explanation

If the researchers had posed the same questions to 5-year-old French and Mundurucú children as they posed to the 7-to-13-year-old children, the results may or may not have corroborated the researchers’ conclusion.

If, however, the Mundurucú children who were 5 years old had the same difficulty in answering the questions as their North American counterparts, then the researchers would have further evidence that the ability is not present in children under the age of 5 but appears to develop thereafter.

The correct answer is Mundurucú children who were 5 years old had just as much trouble answering the questions as did the 5-year-old North American children.

If it were true that North American children 7 to 13 years old had much more trouble answering the questions than did the Mundurucú of the same ages, then this would provide some evidence that the ability is not innate.

The correct answer is North American children 7 to 13 years old had much more trouble answering the questions than did the Mundurucú of the same ages.

hi Sajjad1994

what's the problem of D? if the difficult level is same, then it is more likely to be innate.
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 04 Sep 2026
Posts: 16,387
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,457
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,387
Kudos: 53,632
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
zoezhuyan
what's the problem of D? if the difficult level is same, then it is more likely to be innate.

With respect to the conclusion of the argument, D is unrelated, as it neither strengthens nor weakens the argument.
User avatar
adityaprateek15
Joined: 26 May 2023
Last visit: 13 May 2026
Posts: 346
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 323
Location: India
GPA: 2.7
Posts: 346
Kudos: 171
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
zoezhuyan
Sajjad1994
Official Explanation

If the researchers had posed the same questions to 5-year-old French and Mundurucú children as they posed to the 7-to-13-year-old children, the results may or may not have corroborated the researchers’ conclusion.

If, however, the Mundurucú children who were 5 years old had the same difficulty in answering the questions as their North American counterparts, then the researchers would have further evidence that the ability is not present in children under the age of 5 but appears to develop thereafter.

The correct answer is Mundurucú children who were 5 years old had just as much trouble answering the questions as did the 5-year-old North American children.

If it were true that North American children 7 to 13 years old had much more trouble answering the questions than did the Mundurucú of the same ages, then this would provide some evidence that the ability is not innate.

The correct answer is North American children 7 to 13 years old had much more trouble answering the questions than did the Mundurucú of the same ages.

hi Sajjad1994

what's the problem of D? if the difficult level is same, then it is more likely to be innate.

D seems to be the underlying assumption for the researcher's conclusion to hold true. It doesn't strengthen/weaken the argument.
User avatar
shwetakoshija
Joined: 08 Jul 2017
Last visit: 05 Sep 2026
Posts: 91
Own Kudos:
86
 [3]
Given Kudos: 13
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 91
Kudos: 86
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Given: An experiment tested basic geometric knowledge among three groups:
  • Groups of children and their performance:
    • Group 1: Mundurucu children (7–13 years, no formal geometry training)
    • Group 2: French children (7–13 years, formal geometry training)
    • Group 3: North American children (5 years, no formal geometry training)
  • Groups 1 and 2 answered questions equally quickly and accurately.
  • Researchers’ conclusion: Basic geometric knowledge is innate but develops only after age 5.

To Find:
  • The statement that most strengthens the researcher’s conclusion.
  • The statement that most weakens this conclusion.

Solution:

First note that:
  • To strengthen, we need a statement that supports:
    • Geometric knowledge is innate.
    • But it emerges only after age 5.
  • To weaken, we need a statement that suggests geometry ability depends on learning, not innateness.

Let’s evaluate all statements carefully to find the ones that best our characterization above:

Statement 1: North American children 7 to 13 years old had much more trouble answering the questions than did the Mundurucu of the same ages.
  • This weakens the idea of innate ability that develops after 5. If there really is innate ability and it does develop after 5, then the North Americans children should have performed similarly to the Mundurucu children of the same age.
  • Potential Weakener

Statement 2: None of the 5-year-old North American children had ever studied any geometry.
  • Neutral — does not affect the conclusion about innate knowledge after age 5 (expected for 5-year-olds).

Statement 3: Mundurucu children who were 5 years old had just as much trouble answering the questions as did the 5-year-old North American children.
  • This supports the conclusion. It shows that before age 5, children from both groups (one trained, one not) struggle equally — suggesting the knowledge is innate but not fully developed till after age 5.
  • Strong Strengthener

Statement 4: The researchers posed the same questions to 5-year-old French and Mundurucu children as they posed to the 7-to-13-year-old children.
  • Neutral — just describes methodology.

Statement 5: Most of the children studied answered one or more of the questions incorrectly.
  • Neutral — does not affect the age-based innate ability conclusion.

Correct Answer:
  1. Most Strengthen: Statement 3
  2. Most Weaken: Statement 1

Shweta Koshija
GMAT, GRE, SAT Coach for 10+ years
User avatar
Usernamevisible
Joined: 09 Jun 2022
Last visit: 04 Sep 2026
Posts: 480
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,282
Products:
Posts: 480
Kudos: 110
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
While solving TPA, is it advisable to look at one statement at a time for strengthen and not try to find both strengthen and weaken else it will create a complete mess ?
User avatar
canopyinthecity
Joined: 12 Jul 2025
Last visit: 05 Sep 2026
Posts: 160
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 25
Products:
Posts: 160
Kudos: 106
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Why D does not strengthen? Can anyone explain? bb hr1212
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 05 Sep 2026
Posts: 113,150
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 111,330
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 113,150
Kudos: 839,228
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
canopyinthecity
Why D does not strengthen? Can anyone explain? bb hr1212

The key is to look at what the stem actually tells us and then compare that with what (D) adds.

From the stem, we know:

  • Mundurucu children aged 7 to 13 did well.
  • French children aged 7 to 13 did equally well.
  • North American 5-year-olds had much more trouble.

That leads the researchers to think the geometric ability is innate but normally develops only after age 5.

Now look at (C). It gives us an actual new result: 5-year-old Mundurucu children also struggled. That is strong support because children from a very different culture show the same age pattern.

(D), however, tells us only that the researchers asked 5-year-old French and Mundurucu children the same questions. It never tells us how those children answered.

If they struggled, that would strengthen the conclusion. If they answered perfectly, that would weaken it. Since we do not know the results, (D) by itself tells us nothing useful about whether the conclusion is correct.

So the key difference is simple: (C) gives us a result. (D) only tells us that another test was performed.
User avatar
canopyinthecity
Joined: 12 Jul 2025
Last visit: 05 Sep 2026
Posts: 160
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 25
Products:
Posts: 160
Kudos: 106
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
But we already know the result as per the stem:

  • Mundurucu children aged 7 to 13 did well.
  • French children aged 7 to 13 did equally well.
  • North American 5-year-olds had much more trouble.

When this conclusion is made, if the same questions are asked to all groups, it strengthens the conclusion.
Also in case of its negation, if different level questions were asked, then the conclusion cannot be reliably made.
Hence, the negation weakens.

So, I agree (C) strengthens. It is just that (D) also seems to be strengthening.

Bunuel


The key is to look at what the stem actually tells us and then compare that with what (D) adds.

From the stem, we know:

  • Mundurucu children aged 7 to 13 did well.
  • French children aged 7 to 13 did equally well.
  • North American 5-year-olds had much more trouble.

That leads the researchers to think the geometric ability is innate but normally develops only after age 5.

Now look at (C). It gives us an actual new result: 5-year-old Mundurucu children also struggled. That is strong support because children from a very different culture show the same age pattern.

(D), however, tells us only that the researchers asked 5-year-old French and Mundurucu children the same questions. It never tells us how those children answered.

If they struggled, that would strengthen the conclusion. If they answered perfectly, that would weaken it. Since we do not know the results, (D) by itself tells us nothing useful about whether the conclusion is correct.

So the key difference is simple: (C) gives us a result. (D) only tells us that another test was performed.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 05 Sep 2026
Posts: 113,150
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 111,330
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 113,150
Kudos: 839,228
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
canopyinthecity
But we already know the result as per the stem:

  • Mundurucu children aged 7 to 13 did well.
  • French children aged 7 to 13 did equally well.
  • North American 5-year-olds had much more trouble.

When this conclusion is made, if the same questions are asked to all groups, it strengthens the conclusion.
Also in case of its negation, if different level questions were asked, then the conclusion cannot be reliably made.
Hence, the negation weakens.

So, I agree (C) strengthens. It is just that (D) also seems to be strengthening.



I think you are overcomplicating it. Again, what you say would help only if (D) also told us how the 5-year-old French and Mundurucu children performed. But where does (D) tell us that? It does not. So (D) gives us no new result, while (C) does.
Moderators:
Math Expert
113150 posts
DI Forum Moderator
409 posts