I came across a question in one of my CAT practice exams and I thought I answered it correctly, but it turns out I was wrong. But I have no idea why my solution is not valid as I get the same answer as the solutions manual (just with a different approach). Can someone clarify this for me?
Thank you!
What is the ratio of r to s?
(1) r + s = 7
(2) r^2 – s^2 = 7
I answered (B) - statement 2 is sufficient. My reasoning was:
Numbers: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 etc
Their perfect square: 1, 4, 9, 16, 25 etc.
There is only one occasion in which the difference between two squared numbers is 7 and this 16-9 or 4^2 - 3^2. Thus the ratio of r/s would be 4/3.
Even if you use -1, -2, -3, -4, -5, -6 etc it makes no difference because you still get 4/3.
The solution states that you need both (answer C) in order to solve the problem (and they come up with 4/3 as well). Now using both statements is perfectly valid but why can't I get away with using only (2)?
Any help would be much appreciated!