Is x

Question

Is x < y ?

(1) 2x < 3y
(2) xy > 0

mau5 · Answer

From F.S 1, for x=y=1, we have a NO, for x=1,y=2, we have a YES. Insufficient.

From F.S 2, all we know that is Y and X are of the same sign. Insufficient.

From both the statements together, use the same numbers used for F.S 1,again Insufficient.

E.

Zarrolou · Answer

Nothing to add here, just I wanna give you an other approach.

Is X < Y ? is the red line, so the question now is : is "y" in the higher region defined by the red line?

1.2x < 3y this is the gree line \(y>\frac{2}{3}x\). x will be in the green area. Is this sufficient to say that x is also in the red area?
As you see it's not.

2. XY > 0\((+,+) (-,-)\) are the combinations , so x and y will be in the I or in the III quadrant. Is this sufficient to say that x is in the red area?
As you see it's not.

1+2 Since 1 and 2 give us no other info (the graph is key here), the answer is E.

Hope you like my graph-approach, it helps me in many occasions

Attachments

graph.png [ 11.78 KiB | Viewed 44111 times ]

kabilank87 · Answer

Hi Vinay ,

please explain F.S 1. i don't understand how you conclude F.S 1.

Regards

mau5 · Answer

The question is asking whether Xx^2 I. x>1 II.x is a non-negative number From F.S 1, we know that x>1. Also, the question is asking whether x(1-x)>0--> x(x-1)<0. Now, (x-1) and x are both positive for the given F.S. Thus, for answering the Question Stem, we have a NO, which is a negative answer in the tradional sense, yet SUFFICIENT. Thus, armed with the knowledge that x>1 , can we answer whether x>x^2 . As it turns out, we can and hence this statement is SUFFICIENt. From F.S 2, all we know about x is that it is not negative. Thus, x is greater than or equal to zero. Now, for x=0.5, we will get a YES for the question asked. However, for x=1, we will get a NO. The presence of a YES AND a NO renders this information to be INSUFFICIENT.So, this F.S is NOT Sufficient. Answer : A. Also, noteworthy point that the two F.S don't contradict each other.

Bluelagoon · Answer

Is x < y ?

(1) 2x < 3y
(2) xy > 0

1 just tells us that y>2/3x. example :
lets say x=3, now y is greater that 2 . It can be 2.5 or 4. Insufficient.

2 tells us that both have same signs. hence Insufficient.

E wins.

irda · Answer

Hi Bunuel,

How would do this problem algebraically. Any suggestions?

Thanks

Bunuel · Answer

Number picking would be best strategy for this problem.

irda · Answer

Thanks Bunuel. Do you have any link to effective number picking. I am not good at many sections in quant, however surely worse at number picking. If you can recall any such guidance, please provide - might be somewhere you have discussed.

:-D

BrainLab · Answer

(1) x < 1.5y, clearly not sufficient (for example x can be < 1,5y but =1,2y which is > y) (2) xy > 0, ok, same signs, gives us "zero" info to test x

MathRevolution · Answer

Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution.

Is x < y ?

(1) 2x < 3y
(2) xy > 0

In the original condition, there are 2 variables(x,y), which should match with the number of equations. So you need 2 equations. For 1), 1 equation, for 2) 1 equation, which is likely to make C the answer. When 1) & 2), if x<0 and y<0, they become 2x<3y<2y. However, they also can be x>0 and y>0, which is not sufficient. Therefore, the answer is E.

-> For cases where we need 2 more equations, such as original conditions with “2 variables”, or“3 variables and 1 equation”, or “4 variables and 2 equations”, we have 1 equation each in both 1) and 2). Therefore, there is 70% chance that C is the answer, while E has 25% chance. These two are the majority. In case of common mistake type 3,4, the answer may be from A, B or D but there is only 5% chance. Since C is most likely to be the answer using 1) and 2) separately according to DS definition (It saves us time). Obviously there may be cases where the answer is A, B, D or E.

anairamitch1804 · Answer

The question is asking you whether one thing is smaller (or bigger) than another.

(1) tells you that 2 of one thing is smaller than 3 of another. That's not enough to tell whether one thing is smaller (bigger) than the other. Insufficient.

(2) tells you that x and y share the same sign. Well, that tells you nothing about their relative magnitude; (2) is completely useless.

Combining, we have insufficient (1) with useless (2) so in combo we still have no sufficiency.

Choose (E).

BelalHossain046 · Answer

Statement 1: In this type of question, I test whether the variables have any ability to change the inequality sign. How i test: (a) Take a same positive integer for both variables. If the inequality holds true (normal case), the variables have no ability to change the inequality sign in that situation, three scenarios are possible. (i) both variables are equal, (ii) first variable is greater than second variable, (iii) second variable is greater than first variable If the inequality does not hold true (abnormal case), the variables are playing the main role to change the inequality sign . in that situation, only a fixed role is possible as stated in the inequality. (b) Take a same negative integer for both variables. If the inequality holds true (normal case), the variables have no ability to change the inequality sign in that situation, three scenarios are possible. (i) both variables are equal, (ii) first variable is greater than second variable, (iii) second variable is greater than first variable If the inequality does not hold true (abnormal case), the variables are playing the main role to change the inequality sign . in that situation, only a fixed role is possible as stated in the inequality. back to the main question : Take a same positive integer for both variables. 4<6. Here, the inequality holds true (normal case). i.e. the variables have no ability to change the inequality sign in that situation, three scenarios are possible. (i) both variables are equal , (ii) first variable is greater than second variable (x>y), (iii) second variable is greater than first variable (x0. in other words x and y are both positive or both negative. i.e. (2,3) or (3,2) or (-2,-3) or (-3,-2). Thus, So statement 2 is insufficient. Combining: if x and y are positives, three scenarios are possible. (i) both variables are equal , (ii) first variable is greater than second variable (x>y), (iii) second variable is greater than first variable (x

Archit3110 · Answer

#1
x=y or y>x two possibilities insufficient
#2
xy>0 
x=y = both + or -ve
insufficeint
from 1 & 2
we cannot get anything in common
IMO E

Sri07 · Answer

Can someone help me understand is it OK to take X=Y=1 as a test case for DS questions?  Bunuel

bumpbot · Answer

Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot: 

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

 This post was generated automatically.

Is x < y ? (1) 2x < 3y (2) xy > 0

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia