Last visit was: 10 Sep 2026, 22:00 It is currently 10 Sep 2026, 22:00
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
joemama142000
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Last visit: 16 Jun 2010
Posts: 645
Own Kudos:
1,827
 [2]
Posts: 645
Kudos: 1,827
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Professor
Joined: 29 Dec 2005
Last visit: 09 Aug 2011
Posts: 562
Own Kudos:
Posts: 562
Kudos: 189
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
laxieqv
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Last visit: 24 Jun 2011
Posts: 831
Own Kudos:
Posts: 831
Kudos: 1,539
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Professor
Joined: 29 Dec 2005
Last visit: 09 Aug 2011
Posts: 562
Own Kudos:
Posts: 562
Kudos: 189
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
laxieqv
Professor
B. yes. factors of 100 = 1, 2, 4, 5, 10, 20, 25, 50, 100. it doesnot matter the value of r, r/s terminates in decimal.

But we don't know anything about r, what's if r itself is an unterminated decimal?!
For example: r= 33.333333333333333 and s = 100 ---> r/s = 0.33333333333

I go for C coz:
for every r/s, in case s <>100 , we can multiply s with a factor k ( k=100/s) to make the denominator become 100, then r/s = rk/ 100
Because r is a factor of 100 ---> r is integer ---> rk is an integer ( coz k is also an integer) ---> rk/100 will be terminated in decimal.

For example: r= 1, s = 5 ---> r/s= 20/100= 0.2


hmmmmmm........

your view is definitly appealing but i believe r should be terminated decimal otherwise how we write r?
User avatar
remgeo
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Last visit: 05 Oct 2006
Posts: 263
Own Kudos:
Location: London
Posts: 263
Kudos: 38
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Go with B.
Anything divided by 100 is a terminating decimal
User avatar
joemama142000
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Last visit: 16 Jun 2010
Posts: 645
Own Kudos:
1,827
 [1]
Posts: 645
Kudos: 1,827
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
no oa but i believe this is E. can anyone explain this better?

I. dont know s
100/3= non term
100/5=yes term
insuff

II. dont know r
(1/3)/100=non term
100/100 =yes term

both.
200/100= yes
100/300=no term
User avatar
laxieqv
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Last visit: 24 Jun 2011
Posts: 831
Own Kudos:
Posts: 831
Kudos: 1,539
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
joemama142000
no oa but i believe this is E. can anyone explain this better?

I. dont know s
100/3= non term
100/5=yes term
insuff

II. dont know r
(1/3)/100=non term
100/100 =yes term

both.
200/100= yes
100/300=no term


Buddy, s must be a factor of 100, 300 is not a factor of 100 :wink:

BTW, I'm still stuck to C coz we have to consider the case in which r itself is a non-terminated decimal!
User avatar
giddi77
Joined: 21 Sep 2003
Last visit: 02 Jan 2018
Posts: 526
Own Kudos:
Location: USA
Posts: 526
Kudos: 257
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
laxieqv
Professor
B. yes. factors of 100 = 1, 2, 4, 5, 10, 20, 25, 50, 100. it doesnot matter the value of r, r/s terminates in decimal.

But we don't know anything about r, what's if r itself is an unterminated decimal?!
For example: r= 33.333333333333333 and s = 100 ---> r/s = 0.33333333333


I go for C coz:
for every r/s, in case s <>100 , we can multiply s with a factor k ( k=100/s) to make the denominator become 100, then r/s = rk/ 100
Because r is a factor of 100 ---> r is integer ---> rk is an integer ( coz k is also an integer) ---> rk/100 will be terminated in decimal.

For example:
r= 1, s = 5 ---> r/s= 20/100= 0.2


Agree with Laxie,
If it is specified that r is an integer, then B would be fine.

Since r is not necessarily an integer it could be a fraction too.
Say r =2/3 --> r/s non-terminated decimal
if r = any integer --> r/s terminated decimal

So it cannot be B.

It has to be C as both r & s are factors of 100.
If it were an ETS question, (I hope) r would be specified as an integer and would make C a nice trap!
User avatar
joemama142000
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Last visit: 16 Jun 2010
Posts: 645
Own Kudos:
Posts: 645
Kudos: 1,827
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ill go with C thanks lax
avatar
utkgogia2003
Joined: 31 May 2013
Last visit: 05 Aug 2017
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 8
Kudos: 12
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ans is E
S1- s can be irrational
S2-r can be irratonal
S1+s2- 200/300-.66
None is sufficent
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 10 Sep 2026
Posts: 113,420
Own Kudos:
840,547
 [5]
Given Kudos: 111,453
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 113,420
Kudos: 840,547
 [5]
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
joemama142000
If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as a decimal with only a finite number of nonzero digits?

(1) s is a factor of 100
(2) r is a factor of 100

THEORY:

Reduced fraction \(\frac{a}{b}\) (meaning that fraction is already reduced to its lowest term) can be expressed as terminating decimal if and only \(b\) (denominator) is of the form \(2^n5^m\), where \(m\) and \(n\) are non-negative integers. For example: \(\frac{7}{250}\) is a terminating decimal \(0.028\), as \(250\) (denominator) equals to \(2*5^3\). Fraction \(\frac{3}{30}\) is also a terminating decimal, as \(\frac{3}{30}=\frac{1}{10}\) and denominator \(10=2*5\).

Note that if denominator already has only 2-s and/or 5-s then it doesn't matter whether the fraction is reduced or not.

For example \(\frac{x}{2^n5^m}\), (where x, n and m are integers) will always be terminating decimal.

(We need reducing in case when we have the prime in denominator other then 2 or 5 to see whether it could be reduced. For example fraction \(\frac{6}{15}\) has 3 as prime in denominator and we need to know if it can be reduced.)

Questions testing this concept:
does-the-decimal-equivalent-of-p-q-where-p-and-q-are-89566.html
any-decimal-that-has-only-a-finite-number-of-nonzero-digits-101964.html
if-a-b-c-d-and-e-are-integers-and-p-2-a3-b-and-q-2-c3-d5-e-is-p-q-a-terminating-decimal-125789.html
700-question-94641.html
is-r-s2-is-a-terminating-decimal-91360.html
pl-explain-89566.html
which-of-the-following-fractions-88937.html

BACK TO THE ORIGINAL QUESTION:
If r and s are positive integers, can the fraction r/s be expressed as a decimal with only a finite number of nonzero digits?

(1) s is a factor of 100. Factors of 100 are: 1, 2, 4, 5, 10, 20, 25, 50 and 100. All these numbers are of the form \(2^n5^m\) (for example 1=2^0*5^0, 2=2^1*5^0, ...), therefore no matter what is the value of r, r/s will always will be terminating decimal. Sufficient.

(2) r is a factor of 100. We need to know about the denominator. Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

OPEN DISCUSSION OF THIS QUESTION IS HERE: if-r-and-s-are-positive-integers-141000.html
Moderator:
Math Expert
113419 posts