Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 03:44 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 03:44
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
vshaunak@gmail.com
Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Last visit: 04 Feb 2009
Posts: 312
Own Kudos:
Posts: 312
Kudos: 948
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
mavery
Joined: 11 Mar 2007
Last visit: 22 Aug 2009
Posts: 30
Own Kudos:
Posts: 30
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
vshaunak@gmail.com
Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Last visit: 04 Feb 2009
Posts: 312
Own Kudos:
Posts: 312
Kudos: 948
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Caas
Joined: 04 Mar 2007
Last visit: 13 Aug 2007
Posts: 180
Own Kudos:
Posts: 180
Kudos: 853
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
For me it is B.
w-y-2=0
w=y+2
hence
x=y+1
so: y, x and w are consecutives.
And they are not 1,2 and 3 as there is still z which is greater than 0.
y is not a common divisor of w and x
User avatar
ethan_casta
Joined: 13 Feb 2007
Last visit: 13 Feb 2008
Posts: 34
Own Kudos:
Posts: 34
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
i found the same answer with the same thinking as Caas. I think B.
User avatar
plaguerabbit
Joined: 12 Apr 2007
Last visit: 06 Nov 2009
Posts: 76
Own Kudos:
Posts: 76
Kudos: 29
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I'm gonna go with D on this one.

For both statements, you can prove that w and x are consecutive integers so that there can be no common divisor that is an integer.

If you look at statement 1:

w/x = (1/z) + (1/x)

Since you know that w > x, then w/x must be >1. The last term, (1/x), has to be a fraction because x is >1, therefore in order to make this equation true, z must equal 1.

So now, we have:

w/x = 1 + (1/x)

Multiply both sides by x and we get:

w = x + 1. Therefore, w and x are consecutive integers.


Statement 2:

w^2 - wy - 2w. Factor out a w and you end up with w-y-2=0.

Like Caas explained above, this is the same as w=y+2. thus, y,x, and w are consecutive integers and they are not 1, 2, and 3 because z needs to be a positive integer as well.


Therefore, D?
User avatar
GMATBLACKBELT
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Last visit: 03 Jun 2013
Posts: 1,139
Own Kudos:
Posts: 1,139
Kudos: 1,878
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Im lost :(
User avatar
plaguerabbit
Joined: 12 Apr 2007
Last visit: 06 Nov 2009
Posts: 76
Own Kudos:
Posts: 76
Kudos: 29
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
just curious -- how realistic is it to get one of these types of questions on the actual GMAT?

I have no idea how I would be able to figure out a problem like this in under 2 minutes and I'd probably end up guessing.

This problem took me a good 10 minutes to get a good grasp of, so I'm pretty scared now haha
User avatar
abhinava
Joined: 23 Mar 2007
Last visit: 09 Apr 2010
Posts: 74
Own Kudos:
Posts: 74
Kudos: 12
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
plaguerabbit
I'm gonna go with D on this one.

For both statements, you can prove that w and x are consecutive integers so that there can be no common divisor that is an integer.

If you look at statement 1:

w/x = (1/z) + (1/x)

Since you know that w > x, then w/x must be >1. The last term, (1/x), has to be a fraction because x is >1, therefore in order to make this equation true, z must equal 1.

So now, we have:

w/x = 1 + (1/x)

Multiply both sides by x and we get:

w = x + 1. Therefore, w and x are consecutive integers.


Statement 2:

w^2 - wy - 2w. Factor out a w and you end up with w-y-2=0.

Like Caas explained above, this is the same as w=y+2. thus, y,x, and w are consecutive integers and they are not 1, 2, and 3 because z needs to be a positive integer as well.


Therefore, D?


I too thought on the same lines. It has to be D . Can we have the OA please ?
User avatar
vshaunak@gmail.com
Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Last visit: 04 Feb 2009
Posts: 312
Own Kudos:
Posts: 312
Kudos: 948
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
plaguerabbit
I'm gonna go with D on this one.

For both statements, you can prove that w and x are consecutive integers so that there can be no common divisor that is an integer.

If you look at statement 1:

w/x = (1/z) + (1/x)

Since you know that w > x, then w/x must be >1. The last term, (1/x), has to be a fraction because x is >1, therefore in order to make this equation true, z must equal 1.

So now, we have:

w/x = 1 + (1/x)

Multiply both sides by x and we get:

w = x + 1. Therefore, w and x are consecutive integers.


Statement 2:

w^2 - wy - 2w. Factor out a w and you end up with w-y-2=0.

Like Caas explained above, this is the same as w=y+2. thus, y,x, and w are consecutive integers and they are not 1, 2, and 3 because z needs to be a positive integer as well.


Therefore, D?



PERFECT explanation. OA is 'D'
User avatar
vshaunak@gmail.com
Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Last visit: 04 Feb 2009
Posts: 312
Own Kudos:
Posts: 312
Kudos: 948
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
plaguerabbit
I'm gonna go with D on this one.

For both statements, you can prove that w and x are consecutive integers so that there can be no common divisor that is an integer.

If you look at statement 1:

w/x = (1/z) + (1/x)

Since you know that w > x, then w/x must be >1. The last term, (1/x), has to be a fraction because x is >1, therefore in order to make this equation true, z must equal 1.

So now, we have:

w/x = 1 + (1/x)

Multiply both sides by x and we get:

w = x + 1. Therefore, w and x are consecutive integers.


Statement 2:

w^2 - wy - 2w. Factor out a w and you end up with w-y-2=0.

Like Caas explained above, this is the same as w=y+2. thus, y,x, and w are consecutive integers and they are not 1, 2, and 3 because z needs to be a positive integer as well.


Therefore, D?



PERFECT explanation. OA is 'D'
User avatar
mavery
Joined: 11 Mar 2007
Last visit: 22 Aug 2009
Posts: 30
Own Kudos:
Posts: 30
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Makes sense now. My error was that in statement 1, i did not catch the fact they were consecutive int's. Glad to have you guys to fall back on.



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Data Sufficiency (DS) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
Math Expert
105379 posts
GMAT Tutor
1924 posts