Last visit was: 20 Nov 2025, 07:15 It is currently 20 Nov 2025, 07:15
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
Unnathi
Joined: 11 Aug 2018
Last visit: 18 Jun 2019
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
3
 [3]
Given Kudos: 12
Posts: 8
Kudos: 3
 [3]
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
AkshdeepS
Joined: 13 Apr 2013
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,436
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,002
Status:It's near - I can see.
Location: India
Concentration: International Business, Operations
GPA: 3.01
WE:Engineering (Real Estate)
Products:
Posts: 1,436
Kudos: 1,884
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
divyajeswani
Joined: 26 Jul 2018
Last visit: 31 Oct 2022
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 74
Location: India
Schools: ISB '24
Schools: ISB '24
Posts: 8
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
AkshdeepS
Joined: 13 Apr 2013
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,436
Own Kudos:
1,884
 [3]
Given Kudos: 1,002
Status:It's near - I can see.
Location: India
Concentration: International Business, Operations
GPA: 3.01
WE:Engineering (Real Estate)
Products:
Posts: 1,436
Kudos: 1,884
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
divyajeswani"]Hi,

I am having difficulty understanding this re-arrangement of the formula:

So, Average Age, \(A_{avg} = \frac{(A_1*w_1 + A_2*w_2)}{(w_1 + w_2)}\)

Now if we re-arrange this formula, we get, \(\frac{w_1}{w_2} = \frac{(A_2 – A_{avg})}{(A_{avg} – A_1)}\)

divyajeswani


\(\frac{w_1}{w_2} = \frac{(A_2 – A_{avg})}{(A_{avg} – A_1)}\)

\(w_1(A_{avg} - A_1) = w_2(A_2 - A_{avg})\)

\(w_1*A_{avg} - w_1*A_1 = w_2*A_2 - w_2*A_{avg}\)

\(w_1*A_{avg} + w_2*A_{avg} = w_2*A_2 + w_1*A_1\)

\(A _{avg} (w_1 + w_2) = w_1*A_1 + w_2*A_2\)

\(A_{avg} = \frac{w_1*A_1 + w_2*A_2}{w_1 + w_2}\)


Hope this helps.

All the best.
User avatar
prabsahi
Joined: 09 Jun 2014
Last visit: 24 Mar 2025
Posts: 216
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 205
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
Products:
Posts: 216
Kudos: 289
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Breaking down the replacement question.

I was wondering if we can simply identify that the alcohol concentration so that we can simply use compounding formula when concentration is reducing..
Say

Alcohol final concentration after n replacements =Ai(1-10/100)(1-10/100)..and so on

Say we have a solution of 50% alcohol and water and there are two replacements of 20% of the solution
We can simply relate this as --starting amount of alcohol = 50grams

After two replacements ,
Final amount of alcohol = 50(0.9)(0.9)
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 77,003
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
prabsahi
Breaking down the replacement question.

I was wondering if we can simply identify that the alcohol concentration so that we can simply use compounding formula when concentration is reducing..
Say

Alcohol final concentration after n replacements =Ai(1-10/100)(1-10/100)..and so on

Say we have a solution of 50% alcohol and water and there are two replacements of 20% of the solution
We can simply relate this as --starting amount of alcohol = 50grams

After two replacements ,
Final amount of alcohol = 50(0.9)(0.9)

Absolutely!

Final concentration = Initial Concentration * (Initial Volume/Final Volume)^n
User avatar
himgkp1989
Joined: 25 Mar 2017
Last visit: 30 Oct 2025
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 91
Posts: 16
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel - It has been discussed in our Statistics and Problem Solving book too - can I get the link of this book. I am not able to find this book. Please help.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,420
Own Kudos:
778,519
 [1]
Given Kudos: 99,987
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,420
Kudos: 778,519
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
himgkp1989
Bunuel - It has been discussed in our Statistics and Problem Solving book too - can I get the link of this book. I am not able to find this book. Please help.

Check on Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/Statistics-Probl ... 1936240106
User avatar
Schachfreizeit
Joined: 17 Nov 2022
Last visit: 02 Feb 2023
Posts: 110
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 8
Posts: 110
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Zap the Weighted Average Brutes
BY KARISHMA, VERITAS PREP

I visit the GMAT Club forum regularly and discuss some ideas, some methodologies there. The weighted averages method I discussed in my previous two posts is one of my most highly appreciated inputs on the forum. People love how easily they can solve some of the most difficult questions by just drawing a scale or using a ratio. If you are not a Quant jock, I am sure you feel a chill run down your spine every time you see a mixtures problem. But guess what, they are really simple if you just use the same weighted average concepts we discussed in the previous two posts. Let’s look at a mixtures question in detail:

Question: Mixture A is 20 percent alcohol, and mixture B is 50 percent alcohol. If the two are poured together to create a 15 gallon mixture that contains 30 percent alcohol, approximately how many gallons of mixture A are in the mixture?

(A) 3 gallons
(B) 4 gallons
(C) 5 gallons
(D) 10 gallons
(E) 12 gallons

Solution:

Let’s try and imagine what is taking place here:



Imagine two tumblers, one containing Mixture A and the other containing Mixture B. The mixtures from the two tumblers are poured into a new big empty tumbler. The first thing that we can conclude from this step is that V1 + V2 gallons = 15 gallons because the total volume when you combined the mixtures turned out to be 15 gallons (in the big tumbler).

Can you say anything about the relative value of V1 and V2? Can you say which one will be greater? We discussed in the previous post that when we find the weighted average of two quantities, the average is closer to the one which has higher weight because that quantity ‘pulls’ the average toward itself. So if the new mixture contains 30% alcohol, which of the two mixtures – A (20% alcohol) or B (50% alcohol), will have higher volume? Obviously A because it pulled the average toward itself. The average, 30% alcohol, is closer to 20% than to 50%. Now, let’s calculate exactly how much of the 15 gallons was mixture A and how much was mixture B.

\(\frac{w_1}{w_2} = \frac{(A_2 – A_{avg})}{(A_{avg} – A1)}\)

\(\frac{w_1}{w_2}= \frac{(50 – 30)}{(30 – 20)} = \frac{2}{1}\)

Ratio of volume of mixture A : volume of mixture B = 2:1.

So out of a total of 15 gallons, 10 gallons will be mixture A and 5 gallons will be mixture B. (Check out the post on Ratios if you are not sure how we arrived at this.)

Let’s try the same thing using the scale method:



V1 : V2 = 2:1

So out of a total of 15 gallons, 10 gallons will be mixture A and 5 gallons will be mixture B. It wasn’t very bad, was it?

This question is discussed HERE.

And now, let’s try a quick example that looks ominous. People end up making tons of equations with ‘x’ and ‘y’ to solve this one but we can do it in a moment!

Question: There are 2 bars of copper-nickel alloy. One bar has 2 parts of copper to 5 parts of nickel. The other has 3 parts of copper to 5 parts of nickel. If both bars are melted together to get a 20 kg bar with the final copper to nickel ratio of 5:11. What was the weight of the first bar?

(A) 1 kg
(B) 4 kg
(C) 6 kg
(D) 14 kg
(E) 16 kg

Solution:

This question might look different from the question above but it is actually very similar to it. Focus on any one of the two elements, say Copper (or Nickel if you fancy it more. Either way, you will get the same answer). Forget about the other one. If you notice, in the question above there are two elements in each mixture too (obviously, that is why they are called mixtures!) – Alcohol and Water. 20% Alcohol means that the rest 80% is Water. We just work with the concentration of Alcohol because it is given explicitly to us. We could as well say that mixture A has 80% water and mixture B has 50% water and the combined mixture has 70% water. Still the ratio obtained will be 2:1. But, still, somehow, giving the ratio of both Copper and Nickel in this question throws people off.

Let me quote one of my favorite GMAT instructors here: “And this is one of many reasons why McDonald’s, the greatest marketing organization on earth, is a lot like the GMAT, the test that can help you get into the greatest marketing MBA programs on earth. They know how to make those tiny tweaks that make massive differences, at least in perception to the end consumer.” (Check out the complete(-ly) delicious article that discusses Shamrock Shakes here.)

Anyway, let’s get back to this question. I am keen to show you that it is, in fact, just like the previous question.

First bar is 2/7th copper (2 parts copper and 5 parts nickel to get a total of 7 parts). Second bar is 3/8th copper and the combined alloy is 5/16th copper.

Now, let’s calculate the ratio of weights of the two bars.

\(\frac{w_1}{w_2} = \frac{(A_2 – A_{avg})}{(A_{avg} – A_1)}\)

\(\frac{w_1}{w_2} = \frac{(\frac{3}{8} – \frac{5}{16})}{(\frac{5}{16} – \frac{2}{7})} = \frac{7}{3}\)

So weight of first bar: weight of second bar = 7:3

Out of a total of 20 kgs, the weight of the first bar was 14 kg and the weight of the second bar was 6 kg.

Or we can use the scale method too.



So the ratio of their weights is 1:3/7 or 7:3

Out of a total of 20 kgs, the weight of the first bar was 14 kg and the weight of the second bar was 6 kg.

This question is discussed HERE.

Hope these questions don’t look very intimidating now. Use this method for your mixture problems; they won’t feel like problems any more!

Attachment:
Ques3.jpg
Attachment:
Ques2.jpg
Attachment:
Ques42.jpg

Is it also possible to calculate w1/w2 with A1=2/5, A2= 3/5 and average= 5/11?
I don't understand why we have to calculate the ratios for copper first
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 77,003
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Schachfreizeit
Bunuel
Zap the Weighted Average Brutes
BY KARISHMA, VERITAS PREP

I visit the GMAT Club forum regularly and discuss some ideas, some methodologies there. The weighted averages method I discussed in my previous two posts is one of my most highly appreciated inputs on the forum. People love how easily they can solve some of the most difficult questions by just drawing a scale or using a ratio. If you are not a Quant jock, I am sure you feel a chill run down your spine every time you see a mixtures problem. But guess what, they are really simple if you just use the same weighted average concepts we discussed in the previous two posts. Let’s look at a mixtures question in detail:

Question: Mixture A is 20 percent alcohol, and mixture B is 50 percent alcohol. If the two are poured together to create a 15 gallon mixture that contains 30 percent alcohol, approximately how many gallons of mixture A are in the mixture?

(A) 3 gallons
(B) 4 gallons
(C) 5 gallons
(D) 10 gallons
(E) 12 gallons

Solution:

Let’s try and imagine what is taking place here:



Imagine two tumblers, one containing Mixture A and the other containing Mixture B. The mixtures from the two tumblers are poured into a new big empty tumbler. The first thing that we can conclude from this step is that V1 + V2 gallons = 15 gallons because the total volume when you combined the mixtures turned out to be 15 gallons (in the big tumbler).

Can you say anything about the relative value of V1 and V2? Can you say which one will be greater? We discussed in the previous post that when we find the weighted average of two quantities, the average is closer to the one which has higher weight because that quantity ‘pulls’ the average toward itself. So if the new mixture contains 30% alcohol, which of the two mixtures – A (20% alcohol) or B (50% alcohol), will have higher volume? Obviously A because it pulled the average toward itself. The average, 30% alcohol, is closer to 20% than to 50%. Now, let’s calculate exactly how much of the 15 gallons was mixture A and how much was mixture B.

\(\frac{w_1}{w_2} = \frac{(A_2 – A_{avg})}{(A_{avg} – A1)}\)

\(\frac{w_1}{w_2}= \frac{(50 – 30)}{(30 – 20)} = \frac{2}{1}\)

Ratio of volume of mixture A : volume of mixture B = 2:1.

So out of a total of 15 gallons, 10 gallons will be mixture A and 5 gallons will be mixture B. (Check out the post on Ratios if you are not sure how we arrived at this.)

Let’s try the same thing using the scale method:



V1 : V2 = 2:1

So out of a total of 15 gallons, 10 gallons will be mixture A and 5 gallons will be mixture B. It wasn’t very bad, was it?

This question is discussed HERE.

And now, let’s try a quick example that looks ominous. People end up making tons of equations with ‘x’ and ‘y’ to solve this one but we can do it in a moment!

Question: There are 2 bars of copper-nickel alloy. One bar has 2 parts of copper to 5 parts of nickel. The other has 3 parts of copper to 5 parts of nickel. If both bars are melted together to get a 20 kg bar with the final copper to nickel ratio of 5:11. What was the weight of the first bar?

(A) 1 kg
(B) 4 kg
(C) 6 kg
(D) 14 kg
(E) 16 kg

Solution:

This question might look different from the question above but it is actually very similar to it. Focus on any one of the two elements, say Copper (or Nickel if you fancy it more. Either way, you will get the same answer). Forget about the other one. If you notice, in the question above there are two elements in each mixture too (obviously, that is why they are called mixtures!) – Alcohol and Water. 20% Alcohol means that the rest 80% is Water. We just work with the concentration of Alcohol because it is given explicitly to us. We could as well say that mixture A has 80% water and mixture B has 50% water and the combined mixture has 70% water. Still the ratio obtained will be 2:1. But, still, somehow, giving the ratio of both Copper and Nickel in this question throws people off.

Let me quote one of my favorite GMAT instructors here: “And this is one of many reasons why McDonald’s, the greatest marketing organization on earth, is a lot like the GMAT, the test that can help you get into the greatest marketing MBA programs on earth. They know how to make those tiny tweaks that make massive differences, at least in perception to the end consumer.” (Check out the complete(-ly) delicious article that discusses Shamrock Shakes here.)

Anyway, let’s get back to this question. I am keen to show you that it is, in fact, just like the previous question.

First bar is 2/7th copper (2 parts copper and 5 parts nickel to get a total of 7 parts). Second bar is 3/8th copper and the combined alloy is 5/16th copper.

Now, let’s calculate the ratio of weights of the two bars.

\(\frac{w_1}{w_2} = \frac{(A_2 – A_{avg})}{(A_{avg} – A_1)}\)

\(\frac{w_1}{w_2} = \frac{(\frac{3}{8} – \frac{5}{16})}{(\frac{5}{16} – \frac{2}{7})} = \frac{7}{3}\)

So weight of first bar: weight of second bar = 7:3

Out of a total of 20 kgs, the weight of the first bar was 14 kg and the weight of the second bar was 6 kg.

Or we can use the scale method too.



So the ratio of their weights is 1:3/7 or 7:3

Out of a total of 20 kgs, the weight of the first bar was 14 kg and the weight of the second bar was 6 kg.

This question is discussed HERE.

Hope these questions don’t look very intimidating now. Use this method for your mixture problems; they won’t feel like problems any more!

Attachment:
Ques3.jpg
Attachment:
Ques2.jpg
Attachment:
Ques42.jpg

Is it also possible to calculate w1/w2 with A1=2/5, A2= 3/5 and average= 5/11?
I don't understand why we have to calculate the ratios for copper first

A1, A2 and Avg cannot be a ratio. What will the weights (w1 and w2) be in that case?
The quantities need to make sense.
Check this post: https://anaprep.com/arithmetic-weights- ... d-average/

When we take A1 as 2/7, it is the concentration of copper in bar1 and then the weights will be the total weight of bar1. It makes sense in that case because:

Avg Concentration of copper = Total amount of copper / Total weight of mixture

Avg Concentration of copper = (Conc of copper in bar1 * weight of bar1 + Conc of copper in bar2 * weight of bar2) / Total weight of mixture
User avatar
Schachfreizeit
Joined: 17 Nov 2022
Last visit: 02 Feb 2023
Posts: 110
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 8
Posts: 110
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Zap the Weighted Average Brutes
BY KARISHMA, VERITAS PREP

I visit the GMAT Club forum regularly and discuss some ideas, some methodologies there. The weighted averages method I discussed in my previous two posts is one of my most highly appreciated inputs on the forum. People love how easily they can solve some of the most difficult questions by just drawing a scale or using a ratio. If you are not a Quant jock, I am sure you feel a chill run down your spine every time you see a mixtures problem. But guess what, they are really simple if you just use the same weighted average concepts we discussed in the previous two posts. Let’s look at a mixtures question in detail:

Question: Mixture A is 20 percent alcohol, and mixture B is 50 percent alcohol. If the two are poured together to create a 15 gallon mixture that contains 30 percent alcohol, approximately how many gallons of mixture A are in the mixture?

(A) 3 gallons
(B) 4 gallons
(C) 5 gallons
(D) 10 gallons
(E) 12 gallons

Solution:

Let’s try and imagine what is taking place here:



Imagine two tumblers, one containing Mixture A and the other containing Mixture B. The mixtures from the two tumblers are poured into a new big empty tumbler. The first thing that we can conclude from this step is that V1 + V2 gallons = 15 gallons because the total volume when you combined the mixtures turned out to be 15 gallons (in the big tumbler).

Can you say anything about the relative value of V1 and V2? Can you say which one will be greater? We discussed in the previous post that when we find the weighted average of two quantities, the average is closer to the one which has higher weight because that quantity ‘pulls’ the average toward itself. So if the new mixture contains 30% alcohol, which of the two mixtures – A (20% alcohol) or B (50% alcohol), will have higher volume? Obviously A because it pulled the average toward itself. The average, 30% alcohol, is closer to 20% than to 50%. Now, let’s calculate exactly how much of the 15 gallons was mixture A and how much was mixture B.

\(\frac{w_1}{w_2} = \frac{(A_2 – A_{avg})}{(A_{avg} – A1)}\)

\(\frac{w_1}{w_2}= \frac{(50 – 30)}{(30 – 20)} = \frac{2}{1}\)

Ratio of volume of mixture A : volume of mixture B = 2:1.

So out of a total of 15 gallons, 10 gallons will be mixture A and 5 gallons will be mixture B. (Check out the post on Ratios if you are not sure how we arrived at this.)

Let’s try the same thing using the scale method:



V1 : V2 = 2:1

So out of a total of 15 gallons, 10 gallons will be mixture A and 5 gallons will be mixture B. It wasn’t very bad, was it?

This question is discussed HERE.

And now, let’s try a quick example that looks ominous. People end up making tons of equations with ‘x’ and ‘y’ to solve this one but we can do it in a moment!

Question: There are 2 bars of copper-nickel alloy. One bar has 2 parts of copper to 5 parts of nickel. The other has 3 parts of copper to 5 parts of nickel. If both bars are melted together to get a 20 kg bar with the final copper to nickel ratio of 5:11. What was the weight of the first bar?

(A) 1 kg
(B) 4 kg
(C) 6 kg
(D) 14 kg
(E) 16 kg

Solution:

This question might look different from the question above but it is actually very similar to it. Focus on any one of the two elements, say Copper (or Nickel if you fancy it more. Either way, you will get the same answer). Forget about the other one. If you notice, in the question above there are two elements in each mixture too (obviously, that is why they are called mixtures!) – Alcohol and Water. 20% Alcohol means that the rest 80% is Water. We just work with the concentration of Alcohol because it is given explicitly to us. We could as well say that mixture A has 80% water and mixture B has 50% water and the combined mixture has 70% water. Still the ratio obtained will be 2:1. But, still, somehow, giving the ratio of both Copper and Nickel in this question throws people off.

Let me quote one of my favorite GMAT instructors here: “And this is one of many reasons why McDonald’s, the greatest marketing organization on earth, is a lot like the GMAT, the test that can help you get into the greatest marketing MBA programs on earth. They know how to make those tiny tweaks that make massive differences, at least in perception to the end consumer.” (Check out the complete(-ly) delicious article that discusses Shamrock Shakes here.)

Anyway, let’s get back to this question. I am keen to show you that it is, in fact, just like the previous question.

First bar is 2/7th copper (2 parts copper and 5 parts nickel to get a total of 7 parts). Second bar is 3/8th copper and the combined alloy is 5/16th copper.

Now, let’s calculate the ratio of weights of the two bars.

\(\frac{w_1}{w_2} = \frac{(A_2 – A_{avg})}{(A_{avg} – A_1)}\)

\(\frac{w_1}{w_2} = \frac{(\frac{3}{8} – \frac{5}{16})}{(\frac{5}{16} – \frac{2}{7})} = \frac{7}{3}\)

So weight of first bar: weight of second bar = 7:3

Out of a total of 20 kgs, the weight of the first bar was 14 kg and the weight of the second bar was 6 kg.

Or we can use the scale method too.



So the ratio of their weights is 1:3/7 or 7:3

Out of a total of 20 kgs, the weight of the first bar was 14 kg and the weight of the second bar was 6 kg.

This question is discussed HERE.

Hope these questions don’t look very intimidating now. Use this method for your mixture problems; they won’t feel like problems any more!

Attachment:
Ques3.jpg
Attachment:
Ques2.jpg
Attachment:
Ques42.jpg

i still don't understand how i know what w1, w2, a1 and a2 are
User avatar
shanks2020
Joined: 02 Dec 2018
Last visit: 21 Mar 2024
Posts: 239
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 70
Posts: 239
Kudos: 39
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Zap the Weighted Average Brutes
BY KARISHMA, VERITAS PREP

I visit the GMAT Club forum regularly and discuss some ideas, some methodologies there. The weighted averages method I discussed in my previous two posts is one of my most highly appreciated inputs on the forum. People love how easily they can solve some of the most difficult questions by just drawing a scale or using a ratio. If you are not a Quant jock, I am sure you feel a chill run down your spine every time you see a mixtures problem. But guess what, they are really simple if you just use the same weighted average concepts we discussed in the previous two posts. Let’s look at a mixtures question in detail:

Question: Mixture A is 20 percent alcohol, and mixture B is 50 percent alcohol. If the two are poured together to create a 15 gallon mixture that contains 30 percent alcohol, approximately how many gallons of mixture A are in the mixture?

(A) 3 gallons
(B) 4 gallons
(C) 5 gallons
(D) 10 gallons
(E) 12 gallons

Solution:

Let’s try and imagine what is taking place here:



Imagine two tumblers, one containing Mixture A and the other containing Mixture B. The mixtures from the two tumblers are poured into a new big empty tumbler. The first thing that we can conclude from this step is that V1 + V2 gallons = 15 gallons because the total volume when you combined the mixtures turned out to be 15 gallons (in the big tumbler).

Can you say anything about the relative value of V1 and V2? Can you say which one will be greater? We discussed in the previous post that when we find the weighted average of two quantities, the average is closer to the one which has higher weight because that quantity ‘pulls’ the average toward itself. So if the new mixture contains 30% alcohol, which of the two mixtures – A (20% alcohol) or B (50% alcohol), will have higher volume? Obviously A because it pulled the average toward itself. The average, 30% alcohol, is closer to 20% than to 50%. Now, let’s calculate exactly how much of the 15 gallons was mixture A and how much was mixture B.

\(\frac{w_1}{w_2} = \frac{(A_2 – A_{avg})}{(A_{avg} – A1)}\)

\(\frac{w_1}{w_2}= \frac{(50 – 30)}{(30 – 20)} = \frac{2}{1}\)

Ratio of volume of mixture A : volume of mixture B = 2:1.

So out of a total of 15 gallons, 10 gallons will be mixture A and 5 gallons will be mixture B. (Check out the post on Ratios if you are not sure how we arrived at this.)

Let’s try the same thing using the scale method:



V1 : V2 = 2:1

So out of a total of 15 gallons, 10 gallons will be mixture A and 5 gallons will be mixture B. It wasn’t very bad, was it?

This question is discussed HERE.

And now, let’s try a quick example that looks ominous. People end up making tons of equations with ‘x’ and ‘y’ to solve this one but we can do it in a moment!

Question: There are 2 bars of copper-nickel alloy. One bar has 2 parts of copper to 5 parts of nickel. The other has 3 parts of copper to 5 parts of nickel. If both bars are melted together to get a 20 kg bar with the final copper to nickel ratio of 5:11. What was the weight of the first bar?

(A) 1 kg
(B) 4 kg
(C) 6 kg
(D) 14 kg
(E) 16 kg

Solution:

This question might look different from the question above but it is actually very similar to it. Focus on any one of the two elements, say Copper (or Nickel if you fancy it more. Either way, you will get the same answer). Forget about the other one. If you notice, in the question above there are two elements in each mixture too (obviously, that is why they are called mixtures!) – Alcohol and Water. 20% Alcohol means that the rest 80% is Water. We just work with the concentration of Alcohol because it is given explicitly to us. We could as well say that mixture A has 80% water and mixture B has 50% water and the combined mixture has 70% water. Still the ratio obtained will be 2:1. But, still, somehow, giving the ratio of both Copper and Nickel in this question throws people off.

Let me quote one of my favorite GMAT instructors here: “And this is one of many reasons why McDonald’s, the greatest marketing organization on earth, is a lot like the GMAT, the test that can help you get into the greatest marketing MBA programs on earth. They know how to make those tiny tweaks that make massive differences, at least in perception to the end consumer.” (Check out the complete(-ly) delicious article that discusses Shamrock Shakes here.)

Anyway, let’s get back to this question. I am keen to show you that it is, in fact, just like the previous question.

First bar is 2/7th copper (2 parts copper and 5 parts nickel to get a total of 7 parts). Second bar is 3/8th copper and the combined alloy is 5/16th copper.

Now, let’s calculate the ratio of weights of the two bars.

\(\frac{w_1}{w_2} = \frac{(A_2 – A_{avg})}{(A_{avg} – A_1)}\)

\(\frac{w_1}{w_2} = \frac{(\frac{3}{8} – \frac{5}{16})}{(\frac{5}{16} – \frac{2}{7})} = \frac{7}{3}\)

So weight of first bar: weight of second bar = 7:3

Out of a total of 20 kgs, the weight of the first bar was 14 kg and the weight of the second bar was 6 kg.

Or we can use the scale method too.



So the ratio of their weights is 1:3/7 or 7:3

Out of a total of 20 kgs, the weight of the first bar was 14 kg and the weight of the second bar was 6 kg.

This question is discussed HERE.

Hope these questions don’t look very intimidating now. Use this method for your mixture problems; they won’t feel like problems any more!

Attachment:
Ques3.jpg
Attachment:
Ques2.jpg
Attachment:
Ques42.jpg

Bunuel KarishmaB MartyTargetTestPrep

A general doubt arises out of the above discussion.
Since we know the average is closer to the one that has a higher weight as we saw in the tax rate example and the above example, then why is it not the same for 3 quantities? To give an example below:
30%, 40% and 50% of a solution are mixed in the ratio of 2:3:5. Then as per weighted average calculation, the resultant mixture is 48%.
But using the scale method or just logically thinking, the resultant or the average percentage solution should be closer to the one having the highest weight, i.e 50%*5 rather than 40% * 3 here.
But here 48% is closer to 40%(difference of only 8) than 60%(difference of 12). How can it be explained logically?
User avatar
MartyTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Last visit: 11 Aug 2023
Posts: 3,476
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,430
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 3,476
Kudos: 5,580
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shanks2020
A general doubt arises out of the above discussion.
Since we know the average is closer to the one that has a higher weight as we saw in the tax rate example and the above example, then why is it not the same for 3 quantities? To give an example below:
30%, 40% and 50% of a solution are mixed in the ratio of 2:3:5. Then as per weighted average calculation, the resultant mixture is 48%.
But using the scale method or just logically thinking, the resultant or the average percentage solution should be closer to the one having the highest weight, i.e 50%*5 rather than 40% * 3 here.
But here 48% is closer to 40%(difference of only 8) than 60%(difference of 12). How can it be explained logically?
I think you meant the following, with 60% rather than 50%.

30%, 40% and 60% of a solution are mixed in the ratio of 2:3:5. Then as per weighted average calculation, the resultant mixture is 48%.

The answer to your question is that, while the 60% solution has the greatest weight, the 60% solution does not have more than half the weight. Rather it has only half the weight, with the 30% and the 40% solutions comprising the other half.

Then, think about the fact that the 30% solution is even lower than 40% and is pulling the weighted average down.

Now, does it make sense that the average would be closest to 60%, or would you expect it to be closer to 40%?
User avatar
shanks2020
Joined: 02 Dec 2018
Last visit: 21 Mar 2024
Posts: 239
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 70
Posts: 239
Kudos: 39
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MartyTargetTestPrep
shanks2020
A general doubt arises out of the above discussion.
Since we know the average is closer to the one that has a higher weight as we saw in the tax rate example and the above example, then why is it not the same for 3 quantities? To give an example below:
30%, 40% and 60% of a solution are mixed in the ratio of 2:3:5. Then as per weighted average calculation, the resultant mixture is 48%.
But using the scale method or just logically thinking, the resultant or the average percentage solution should be closer to the one having the highest weight, i.e 50%*5 rather than 40% * 3 here.
But here 48% is closer to 40%(difference of only 8) than 60%(difference of 12). How can it be explained logically?
I think you meant the following, with 60% rather than 50%.

30%, 40% and 60% of a solution are mixed in the ratio of 2:3:5. Then as per weighted average calculation, the resultant mixture is 48%.

The answer to your question is that, while the 60% solution has the greatest weight, the 60% solution does not have more than half the weight. Rather it has only half the weight, with the 30% and the 40% solutions comprising the other half.

Then, think about the fact that the 30% solution is even lower than 40% and is pulling the weighted average down.

Now, does it make sense that the average would be closest to 60%, or would you expect it to be closer to 40%?

MartyTargetTestPrep

Thanks for correcting to 60%. But per the calculation, 60% does have more than half the weight.
30%*2 = 60 ; 40%*3 = 120 ; 60% * 5 = 300
Total = 480
Hence, 60% even with this logic also, 60% has more than half the weight.
Then, logically why is the average not closest to 60% but closest to 40%?
User avatar
MartyTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Last visit: 11 Aug 2023
Posts: 3,476
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,430
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 3,476
Kudos: 5,580
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shanks2020
MartyTargetTestPrep
shanks2020
A general doubt arises out of the above discussion.
Since we know the average is closer to the one that has a higher weight as we saw in the tax rate example and the above example, then why is it not the same for 3 quantities? To give an example below:
30%, 40% and 60% of a solution are mixed in the ratio of 2:3:5. Then as per weighted average calculation, the resultant mixture is 48%.
But using the scale method or just logically thinking, the resultant or the average percentage solution should be closer to the one having the highest weight, i.e 50%*5 rather than 40% * 3 here.
But here 48% is closer to 40%(difference of only 8) than 60%(difference of 12). How can it be explained logically?
I think you meant the following, with 60% rather than 50%.

30%, 40% and 60% of a solution are mixed in the ratio of 2:3:5. Then as per weighted average calculation, the resultant mixture is 48%.

The answer to your question is that, while the 60% solution has the greatest weight, the 60% solution does not have more than half the weight. Rather it has only half the weight, with the 30% and the 40% solutions comprising the other half.

Then, think about the fact that the 30% solution is even lower than 40% and is pulling the weighted average down.

Now, does it make sense that the average would be closest to 60%, or would you expect it to be closer to 40%?

MartyTargetTestPrep

Thanks for correcting to 60%. But per the calculation, 60% does have more than half the weight.
30%*2 = 60 ; 40%*3 = 120 ; 60% * 5 = 300
Total = 480
Hence, 60% even with this logic also, 60% has more than half the weight.
Then, logically why is the average not closest to 60% but closest to 40%?
Of the total quantity of solution, 2/10 is the 30% solution and 3/10 is 40% solution, for a total of 5/10, or half the weight.

5/10 is the 60% solution, representing the other half of the weight.

So, the 60% solution makes up half of the total quantity, rather than more than half.
User avatar
Sharyfrank
Joined: 05 Oct 2023
Last visit: 05 Oct 2023
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The discrepancy you've observed in the weighted average calculation is because of how percentages work in weighted averages. When you're calculating a weighted average, you're essentially taking into account the contribution of each quantity based on its weight, not its proximity to other percentages. Here's why the weighted average in your example is 48%:

In your example, you have three quantities: 30%, 40%, and 60%. These percentages are mixed in the ratio of 2:3:5. That means for every 2 parts of 30%, you have 3 parts of 40%, and 5 parts of 60%. In total, you have 2 + 3 + 5 = 10 parts.

To calculate the weighted average, you compute it as follows:

(Weight1 * Percentage1 + Weight2 * Percentage2 + Weight3 * Percentage3) / (Total Weight)

= (2/10 * 30% + 3/10 * 40% + 5/10 * 60%)
= (0.2 * 30% + 0.3 * 40% + 0.5 * 60%)
= (6% + 12% + 30%)
= 48%

So, the weighted average is indeed 48% because it takes into account not just the proximity of percentages but also their respective weights in the mixture. In this case, the larger weight of 60% contributes significantly to the resulting weighted average of 48%.

While it may seem counterintuitive at first, this is how weighted averages work mathematically, ensuring that the contribution of each component is considered relative to its weight in the overall mixture.
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,600
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,600
Kudos: 1,079
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
   1   2 
Moderator:
Math Expert
105420 posts