Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 21:54 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 21:54
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
nsidelnik
Joined: 30 Dec 2009
Last visit: 15 Oct 2011
Posts: 20
Given Kudos: 1
Location: NYC
Schools:Columbia (waitlist w/int), Yale (interview), Wharton (interview), MIT (interview), Stanford, Harvard
GPA: 3.44 at MIT and 3.23 at Franklin Pierce Law Center
WE 1: 6 months as associate with IP boutique firm
WE 2: 18 months as general counsel of startup company
Posts: 20
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
eminent
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 16 Aug 2009
Last visit: 23 Oct 2010
Posts: 343
Own Kudos:
40
 [1]
Given Kudos: 22
Schools:Columbia Business School - Class of 2012
Posts: 343
Kudos: 40
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
jon82
Joined: 08 Feb 2010
Last visit: 21 May 2013
Posts: 47
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 11
Schools:Oxford '11
Posts: 47
Kudos: 13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
hypermeganet
Joined: 30 Sep 2009
Last visit: 21 Feb 2014
Posts: 141
Own Kudos:
Posts: 141
Kudos: 36
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Why not just do Stern at night? Why leave a presumably lucrative, if short, career in IP law?

And I would be wary of adcoms that are even remotely familiar with law. I mean this with the utmost respect (and only say something because it might come up): Franklin Pierce is a really bad school (in the realm of law schools, even with its IP focus, it is tier 3, at best) and pulling a 3.2 there is a red flag. You have limited work experience and aren't working at the IP boutique anymore - any reason you jumped ship so quickly? Was it a shop that paid NYC market?

Also, I'm not sure why you'd need an MBA to pursue your goal. You have a background in IP law, a JD, and the tech background from MIT. You've only been out of school since 2008 and have had limited work experience.

These are some of the issues you'll encounter from an adcom's perspective, I think. I know I'd ask those questions if I saw your profile.
avatar
anu1979
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Jan 2010
Last visit: 29 Jul 2011
Posts: 122
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 17
Posts: 122
Kudos: 42
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
hypermeganet
Why not just do Stern at night? Why leave a presumably lucrative, if short, career in IP law?

And I would be wary of adcoms that are even remotely familiar with law. I mean this with the utmost respect (and only say something because it might come up): Franklin Pierce is a really bad school (in the realm of law schools, even with its IP focus, it is tier 3, at best) and pulling a 3.2 there is a red flag. You have limited work experience and aren't working at the IP boutique anymore - any reason you jumped ship so quickly? Was it a shop that paid NYC market?

Also, I'm not sure why you'd need an MBA to pursue your goal. You have a background in IP law, a JD, and the tech background from MIT. You've only been out of school since 2008 and have had limited work experience.

These are some of the issues you'll encounter from an adcom's perspective, I think. I know I'd ask those questions if I saw your profile.

Sorry to pipe up just to contradict another poster, but technically the issue about the GPA isn't necessarily true. An adcom with a familiarity with the legal world is also likely to know that a whole bunch of Tier 2/Tier 3 schools have way, way, way harsher grading than the majority of Tier 1 schools, mainly because they don't want the top kids to transfer out. I have colleagues who attended Tier 2 schools that have low 3/high 2 GPAs but were ranked fairly high in their class. If the original poster has a cum laude+ attached to his law degree (i.e., he's ranked somewhere in the top percentages of his class), I don't think they're going to call the GPA into question. I would definitely use the optional essay to somehow convey this point, though.

I agree about the quick abandonment of the law, though. I'm on my 5th year of practice and kind of felt like I had a combo of enough work experience on financial transactions (have a portfolio, worked with a wide variety of financial institutions) to be able to craft together a story about why "b-school" but not enough that they'd put me in the executive mba basket. Are you sure you don't want to practice for a couple more years?
User avatar
hypermeganet
Joined: 30 Sep 2009
Last visit: 21 Feb 2014
Posts: 141
Own Kudos:
Posts: 141
Kudos: 36
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I concede that a lot of lower tier schools appear to grade on a harsh curve (although I disagree about it being due to the fact they want to keep 1Ls there), and FP is known for a harsh curve. To be fair, OP could have received a full scholarship to FP and a 3.23 GPA could be well above median, I don't know.
avatar
nsidelnik
Joined: 30 Dec 2009
Last visit: 15 Oct 2011
Posts: 20
Given Kudos: 1
Location: NYC
Schools:Columbia (waitlist w/int), Yale (interview), Wharton (interview), MIT (interview), Stanford, Harvard
GPA: 3.44 at MIT and 3.23 at Franklin Pierce Law Center
WE 1: 6 months as associate with IP boutique firm
WE 2: 18 months as general counsel of startup company
Posts: 20
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks for the feedback everyone. I admit the Franklin Pierce sucks, except in IP, where it is consistently in the top 5 IP schools nation wide. I went there because I got nearly a full scholarship and I knew I wanted to go into IP law. My GPA was not the highest there, but it wasn't bad either. I had a bumpy transition from technical education to writing intensive course work, but I got by barings and my last 3 semesters I had a 3.6 average. I think my GMAT score will also calm any concerns over my ability to handle the coursework.

For a while I had the job I wanted, making 6 figures with a top New York IP boutique firm. Unfortunately they dissolved back in January of 2009 after a solid 115 year run. Nearly all the associates were left twisting in the wind. I landed a job as general counsel of a startup company, which exposed me to business and got me thinking about a career switch into venture capital.

I have been invited to interview at Columbia and Yale so far, still waiting from the other schools. If you guys have any more tips or areas you think I should be concerned about, please share them with me.

Thanks!
avatar
gregarious
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 11 Apr 2009
Last visit: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 212
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Concentration: Operations
Posts: 212
Kudos: 14
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hey, your thread is one of the more interesting ones I've come across in Peer Review. Some of my friends are in law school right now and after hearing their horror stories about current recruiting I've been reading some of the anti-law school blogs that are out there. Given the general outlook for lawyers in general in the foreseeable future (although IP is supposed to be less hard hit that BigLaw), it seems now is as good a time as any to re-brand yourself as an MBA with a tech and IP background.

Other posters have already made some good points about your WE and law school GPA, so all I would add is that you probably really need to focus on "Why MBA" in your interviews. Good luck!