OE
2. One can infer from the passage that, in visual recognition, the process of matching
Go through the answer choices, eliminating any choices that obviously contradict what the passage states or implies. Remember that in answering inference questions you must go beyond the obvious, beyond what the authors explicitly state, to look for logical implications of what they say.
Choice A is incorrect. Nothing in the passage suggests that the matching process requires or demands neural inactivity. Rather, the entire process of visual recognition, including the matching of images, requires neural activity.
Choice D is incorrect. It is clear from the passage that the matching process is not fully understood; nothing yet has been absolutely proven. The weight of the evidence seems to support the serial hypothesis, but controversy still surrounds the entire question.
Choice E is incorrect. It can be eliminated because it directly contradicts information in the passage stating that recognition most likely is a serial or step-by-step process rather than a parallel one receiving an image as a single unit.
Choices B and C are left. Which is a possible inference? Choice C seems a possible inference. Although the author never says so, it seems logical that you could not match an object if you had never seen it before. After all, if you had never seen the object before, you would have no prior internal image of it and would have nothing with which to match it. What about
Choice B? Nothing in the passage mentions altering any attributes or features of a familiar object. Therefore, on the basis of the passage you have no way to deduce whether matching would or would not be possible if such a change took place. There is not enough information in the passage to justify Choice B as an inference.
The correct answer is Choice C.