BinodBhai
Experts can we assume that train A was travelling at a constant speed on the bridge too and that the pole is on the bridge?
MartyMurray KarishmaBI think we can infer that the speeds are the same, but the truth is that this question is poorly written.
It should be a medium- to hard-level question that involves seeing that you can use the information about train B to determine the length of the bridge and then use the other information to determine the length of A. Instead, because of minor detail, it can be argued that it's unclear what's going on with the speed of train A.
So, your best move is not to worry too much about this correct answer to this question.
What we can learn from this question is how to use relationships between speeds and distance to calculate other distances. We can also see that it's important to consider whether we've been told that something is traveling at a constant rate. At the same time, hopefully, any question involving such concepts that we see on the test will be better written than this one.
Here's a better constructed example of a DS question in which noticing that a rate may not have been constant is key.
https://gmatclub.com/forum/stations-x-a ... 77177.html