Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 10:59 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 10:59
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
swath20
Joined: 25 Oct 2004
Last visit: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 141
Own Kudos:
Posts: 141
Kudos: 298
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Rupstar
Joined: 15 Feb 2005
Last visit: 12 Apr 2007
Posts: 116
Own Kudos:
Location: Rockville
Posts: 116
Kudos: 13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
swath20
Joined: 25 Oct 2004
Last visit: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 141
Own Kudos:
Posts: 141
Kudos: 298
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Rupstar
Joined: 15 Feb 2005
Last visit: 12 Apr 2007
Posts: 116
Own Kudos:
Location: Rockville
Posts: 116
Kudos: 13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Statement 2 is in sufficient cause it would mean that the clean numbers are 3, 5,7...
statement 1 shows that it is 3,5, 6,7..
does that show why there is at least 1 non odd number?
User avatar
greenandwise
Joined: 30 Dec 2004
Last visit: 30 May 2006
Posts: 188
Own Kudos:
Location: California
Posts: 188
Kudos: 15
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My answer here is D.

The question is:
what is the probab of selecting a " clean" number from a set of integers containing all multiples of 3 between 1 and 99, inclusive?

So in my opinion all you need is a definition of what a clean number is. From both statements you can get a definite number of integers that fulfill the criterion mentioned...so therfore I think the answer is D.

And statement 2 should be sufficient because all you have to do is pick the odd number which are multiples of 3 and divide them by all the odd numbers between 1 and 99...don't see why that isn't sufficient
User avatar
faizaniftikhar83
Joined: 13 Feb 2005
Last visit: 30 Sep 2006
Posts: 32
Own Kudos:
Location: Lahore, Pakistan
Posts: 32
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
greenandwise
My answer here is D.

The question is:
what is the probab of selecting a " clean" number from a set of integers containing all multiples of 3 between 1 and 99, inclusive?

So in my opinion all you need is a definition of what a clean number is. From both statements you can get a definite number of integers that fulfill the criterion mentioned...so therfore I think the answer is D.

And statement 2 should be sufficient because all you have to do is pick the odd number which are multiples of 3 and divide them by all the odd numbers between 1 and 99...don't see why that isn't sufficient



definitely, i agree with u my man...the basic object is to find 'probability' not 'validity'
avatar
amit_upasani
Joined: 17 Feb 2005
Last visit: 17 Jun 2005
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 6
Kudos: 62
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This question is similar to another one posted here somewhere. Statement 1 gives a complete (in itself) definition of a clean number whereas Statement 2 only describes what could be one of many attributes of a clean no.

A it is!
User avatar
nocilis
Joined: 19 Nov 2004
Last visit: 11 Jul 2008
Posts: 274
Own Kudos:
Location: SF Bay Area, USA
Posts: 274
Kudos: 1,539
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The set is clearly defined. Whatever the restrictions the statements 1 and 2 impose, we can still find a single probability. So it is D

Note: If the set were infinite, we can't find a probability.

EDIT:
On rethink - A is probably it.
Statement 2 does not clearly define a Clean number.
A clean number must be odd does not imply all odd numbers are clean numbers.
User avatar
MA
Joined: 25 Nov 2004
Last visit: 09 Aug 2011
Posts: 697
Own Kudos:
Posts: 697
Kudos: 515
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
swath20
what is the probab of selecting a " clean" number from a set of integers containing all multiples of 3 between 1 and 99, inclusive?

(1) A " clean" no is an integer divisible only by 2 factors, one of which is greater than 2
(2) A " clean" no must be odd


using each statement seperately, both are suff to ans independently. but if you, take stat 1 into consideration 2 seems incomplete. we know that a clean number is only 3 and each st must give a specific answer. therefore, OA should be A. however, we cannot totaly disagree with the other part of the discussions.
avatar
thearch
Joined: 19 Feb 2005
Last visit: 23 Aug 2011
Posts: 212
Own Kudos:
Location: Milan Italy
Posts: 212
Kudos: 74
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MA
thearch
IMO, That's right!

IMO=?


In my opinion :)
User avatar
mirhaque
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
Last visit: 06 Aug 2008
Posts: 211
Own Kudos:
Posts: 211
Kudos: 255
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
swath20
what is the probab of selecting a " clean" number from a set of integers containing all multiples of 3 between 1 and 99, inclusive?

(1) A " clean" no is an integer divisible only by 2 factors, one of which is greater than 2

(2) A " clean" no must be odd


wait a second....
6 is divisible exactly by two factors ( I assume factors don't include 1 or the number itself) 2 and 3, but it's not odd.

So we need B.

answer should be C.
avatar
HongHu
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Last visit: 25 Apr 2011
Posts: 966
Own Kudos:
Posts: 966
Kudos: 796
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
swath20
what is the probab of selecting a " clean" number from a set of integers containing all multiples of 3 between 1 and 99, inclusive?

(1) A " clean" no is an integer divisible only by 2 factors, one of which is greater than 2

(2) A " clean" no must be odd


We are asked to find the probability. We are not asked to find one "clean" number. In other words, as some of the others already mentioned here, as long as the definition is clearly defined, then we will be able to identify all "clean" numbers and thus the probability of pick them from a clearly defined set.

On this note, (1) is clearly define, but (2) is not. (2) would be sufficient if it is formulated like this:
(2) A "clean" number means an odd number.

When it says a clean number must be odd, we do not know if there's other requirements for a clean number. Perhaps it must be odd and greater than 50? Or whatever. As long as we don't know the exact definition of a clean number, we cannot pin down the set of clean numbers, and thus cannot find the probability that we were asked to find.
User avatar
swath20
Joined: 25 Oct 2004
Last visit: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 141
Own Kudos:
Posts: 141
Kudos: 298
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks Hong Hu for your detailed explanation
User avatar
anirban16
Joined: 24 Jan 2005
Last visit: 20 Jun 2005
Posts: 141
Own Kudos:
Location: Boston
Posts: 141
Kudos: 68
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Should be D

As there are 33 possible outcomes or numbers.

(1) No of favorable outcomes: all Prime greater than 2 so Probab can be found

(2) favorable outcomes Only odd numbers again Probab can be found



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Data Sufficiency (DS) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
Math Expert
105390 posts
GMAT Tutor
1924 posts