Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
I understand what the premise and conclusion are, and I understand which is what and how to find them, but how does labeling the premise and conclusion actually help me solve a CR problem? Basically, how am I suppose to use the premise/conclusion?
Are premises taken as facts, and I should be attacking the conclusion only?
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
I understand what the premise and conclusion are, and I understand which is what and how to find them, but how does labeling the premise and conclusion actually help me solve a CR problem? Basically, how am I suppose to use the premise/conclusion?
Are premises taken as facts, and I should be attacking the conclusion only?
Yes, premises are facts or the source of truth that MUST be not be broken.
Understanding the premise and conclusion actually helps you to identify what needs to be broken/strengthened or what made author to come to that conclusion.
Conclusion can always be weakened but premises not.
I understand what the premise and conclusion are, and I understand which is what and how to find them, but how does labeling the premise and conclusion actually help me solve a CR problem? Basically, how am I suppose to use the premise/conclusion?
Are premises taken as facts, and I should be attacking the conclusion only?
Yes, premises are facts or the source of truth that MUST be not be broken.
Understanding the premise and conclusion actually helps you to identify what needs to be broken/strengthened or what made author to come to that conclusion.
Conclusion can always be weakened but premises not.
Does that make sense?
Show more
Premise is basically set of facts which lead to conclusion via assumptions made.
I understand what the premise and conclusion are, and I understand which is what and how to find them, but how does labeling the premise and conclusion actually help me solve a CR problem? Basically, how am I suppose to use the premise/conclusion?
Are premises taken as facts, and I should be attacking the conclusion only?
Show more
We actually attack the assumption that take us from Premise(s) to conclusion. But yes, Premises are taken as Facts. So, every option going against a stated Premise should be eliminated right away, though you will hardly find any such question.
The most important reason for labeling sentences as Premise and Conclusion is that there are a lot of Strengthen Questions in which some options will support the Premise instead of the Conclusion and because our job is to Strengthen the Conclusion, those options would be the incorrect ones. I hope it makes sense.
There's one type of CR question, 'structure'/'describe the role' questions, which will ask you directly about the premise(s) and conclusion of the argument.
It's also useful on other types of CR problem, because understanding an argument is synonymous with understanding the conclusion and premises. In order to get the right answer, for any problem type, you need to know what the argument is saying, and for that, you really only need to know two things:
- What is the author arguing? (That's the conclusion.) - Why does the author think that his or her point is correct? (That's the premise(s)).
On problem types other than describe the role problems, you don't need to be able to label the exact sentence that contains the conclusion. But if you don't know what it is, there's no reliable way to tell whether an answer is right or not.
Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).
Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.