I found that this question has been discussed as second time but there was a very good answer by [b]baru (Pls give him the credit) and I'll repost his answers hoping it will help those that got a question wrong.[/b]Topic and Scope: The author discusses the United Nations‘ current role in improving human rights and suggests a future course of action.
Mapping the Passage:1 questions how human rights might be best protected and states that the United Nations has no such power currently.
2 states that the form this work takes is twofold: attempts to change views and policies, and to award or withhold approval based on nations‘ policies.
3 argues that the UN must work for short-term change and points out that UN policies influence national politics.
1) Predict by recalling what the author says the UN cannot do: paragraph 1 argues that the UN can‘t back up its commands with force. (B) says the same.
(A): Opposite. The author argues in paragraph 2 and 3 that the UN has done just this in its policies against torture, for example.
(B): The correct answer
(C): Opposite. This is one of the methods of effecting change mentioned in paragraph 2.
(D): Opposite. The author mentions this in paragraph 3, with torture again as an example.
(E): Opposite. This can be inferred from paragraph 2.
2) Predict by summarizing the author‘s general point: the UN needs to have a shortterm impact in order to effect long-term change. (D) follows from this and from the author‘s discussion of court cases that already do rely on the UN for human rights standards. If Filartiga did this in the past, it‘s reasonable to believe that future cases will do the same.
(A): Distortion. The author argues that the UN needs to do more, but argues throughout the passage that the UN has had an impact on human rights.
(B): Out of Scope. While the author thinks that human rights should be one concern of the UN, there‘s no comparison to other tasks that the UN undertakes, and so it can‘t be said that human rights should be the primary concern.
(C): Out of Scope. The author is only concerned with how the UN affects national politics, and especially national human rights issues. International politics is outside the scope of the court cases and situations mentioned.
(D): The correct answer
(E): Military powers‘ is extreme and out of scope
3) Start your prediction broadly: what is the purpose of the paragraph in which the court case is mentioned? To argue that the UN should effect short-term change. Double-check by scanning the relevant text to see if the case backs this up: it‘s an example of a short-term effect brought about directly by UN policies. (A) summarizes the point.
(A): The correct answer
(B): Opposite. This is a case in which the UN had a short-term effect.
(C): Faulty Use of Detail. While this is probably true based on the information in the passage, the author isn‘t trying to prove this point, but rather that the UN can effect change in the short term.
(D): Out of Scope. The UN isn‘t making a decision in the court case; a US court is. There‘s no mention of the UN withholding legitimacy.
(E): Incorrect, as described above.
4) Review your map for a quick prediction. The author presents rhetorical questions to show that the UN doesn‘t have many tools to enforce short-term change. (B) says the same.
(A): Out of Scope. Though the author touches on this later on in the passage, he‘s not yet concerned with discussing it in paragraph 1.
(B): The correct answer
(C): Out of Scope. This is the focus of paragraph 2 rather than paragraph 1.
(D): Distortion. Though the author does briefly describe the UN‘s function, most of the paragraph is concerned with describing what it doesn’t do.
(E): The author doesn‘t ‗praise‘ the UN anywhere in the first paragraph