Last visit was: 14 Dec 2024, 14:43 It is currently 14 Dec 2024, 14:43
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 14 Dec 2024
Posts: 97,877
Own Kudos:
685,888
 []
Given Kudos: 88,270
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 97,877
Kudos: 685,888
 []
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Vjajo
Joined: 06 Apr 2019
Last visit: 27 Jun 2024
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
53
 []
Given Kudos: 54
Location: India
Posts: 21
Kudos: 53
 []
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Livelifeloud20
Joined: 02 Dec 2020
Last visit: 29 Nov 2021
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
14
 []
Given Kudos: 5
Status:Software Engineer
Posts: 18
Kudos: 14
 []
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Fdambro294
Joined: 10 Jul 2019
Last visit: 19 Oct 2024
Posts: 1,369
Own Kudos:
639
 []
Given Kudos: 1,658
Posts: 1,369
Kudos: 639
 []
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The argument is presented in the form of a Conditional Argument or an “IF-THEN” type argument.

The argument links together two IF-THEN Premises.

Then, by denying the consequent (the “contrapositive”), the Conclusion is made.

IF - region has draught ————> THEN - water levels reduced

If A , then B

And

IF - water levels reduced ———-> THEN - food is scarce

If B, then C

Conclusion: IF - food is NOT scarce ———> THEN - the region is not in a draught

If NOT C, then NOT A

We are looking for the same logical reasoning: in summary:

If A, then B ———-> if B, then C——-> if NOT C, then NOT A


Answer B provides the same outline of logical reasoning used to get to the Conclusion.

“If temp falls below freezing, petunias will die.”

If A ———> then B

“If petunias die, they will not flower anymore.

If B ——-> then C

“So if petunias still produce flowers, the temp is not below freezing.

If NOT C ——-> then NOT A


The answer is B


Bunuel
When a region is in a drought, the water level of rivers and streams is seriously reduced. When water levels are down, food is also scarce for wildlife. Therefore, if food is not scarce for wildlife, then the region is not in a drought.

In which one of the following selections does the reasoning most closely follow the reasoning in the above passage?


(A) If the dirty clothes hamper is full, the sock drawer is empty, and if the sock drawer is empty, the dirty clothes hamper is full, so if the sock drawer is not empty, the clothes hamper is not full.

(B) If the temperature falls below freezing, the petunias will die, and if the petunias die, they will not flower any more, so if the petunias still produce flowers, the temperature is not below freezing.

(C) If raccoons bear live young, they must be mammals, so if they are amphibians, they must lay eggs to reproduce, if they reproduce at all.

(D) If you want to fix an omelet, you will have to use six eggs, and you will have no eggs left for pancakes, so if you make the omelet, you won’t be able to fix pancakes.

(E) If earth scientists are correct, global temperatures are warming, and if the earth’s temperature increases, ocean levels will rise, so if ocean levels rise, earth scientists were correct.

Posted from my mobile device
avatar
Leehongnhung
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 25 Jan 2020
Last visit: 10 Apr 2022
Posts: 14
Own Kudos:
4
 []
Given Kudos: 29
Location: Viet Nam
GMAT 1: 660 Q50 V29
GPA: 3.49
GMAT 1: 660 Q50 V29
Posts: 14
Kudos: 4
 []
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The argument shows a cause-effect relationship:
Drought -> [water level down] -> scarce food => If not scarce food -> not drought
It's like A -> B then Not B -> Not A. We have to find a similar cause-effect relationship
A. Even this answer sets a relationship for clothes hamper and sock drawer similar to A -> B then not B -> not A, it's not the cause-effect relationship -> Wrong
B. Similar relationship: freezing temperature-> petunias die -> no flower => If still flower -> not freezing. This is correct answer
C and D There is no relationship at all -> Wrong
E. Although this answer tries to set up the relationship between the correctness of scientists and the warming of global temperature, tt's ambiguity when says that ocean levels rise then scientists were correct. Thus, it's wrong.
User avatar
unraveled
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Last visit: 14 Dec 2024
Posts: 2,741
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 764
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy)
Posts: 2,741
Kudos: 2,011
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
When a region is in a drought, the water level of rivers and streams is seriously reduced. When water levels are down, food is also scarce for wildlife. Therefore, if food is not scarce for wildlife, then the region is not in a drought.

In which one of the following selections does the reasoning most closely follow the reasoning in the above passage?


(A) If the dirty clothes hamper is full, the sock drawer is empty, and if the sock drawer is empty, the dirty clothes hamper is full, so if the sock drawer is not empty, the clothes hamper is not full.

(B) If the temperature falls below freezing, the petunias will die, and if the petunias die, they will not flower any more, so if the petunias still produce flowers, the temperature is not below freezing.

(C) If raccoons bear live young, they must be mammals, so if they are amphibians, they must lay eggs to reproduce, if they reproduce at all.

(D) If you want to fix an omelet, you will have to use six eggs, and you will have no eggs left for pancakes, so if you make the omelet, you won’t be able to fix pancakes.

(E) If earth scientists are correct, global temperatures are warming, and if the earth’s temperature increases, ocean levels will rise, so if ocean levels rise, earth scientists were correct.
The reasoning is like A --> B --> C and then C'--> A'.

Only B and E stand since both have A, B and C components. However, E loses out because A remains as A not A' and C remain as C not C' that leads to A'. It is C --> A which is not same as C' --> A'.

Answer B.
User avatar
krndatta
Joined: 09 Feb 2020
Last visit: 17 Oct 2024
Posts: 383
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 433
Location: India
Posts: 383
Kudos: 43
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KarishmaB Ma'am,

Why cannot D be the answer?
If A(Fix an Omelet), then B(Use 6 Eggs)
If B(Use 6 Eggs), then C(No Pancakes)
IF A(Fix an Omelet), then C(No Pancakes)

So Not C---> Not A

Isn't this similar to the original argument?
Please evaluate where am I going wrong.

Thanks
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 14 Dec 2024
Posts: 15,547
Own Kudos:
70,259
 []
Given Kudos: 449
Location: Pune, India
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 15,547
Kudos: 70,259
 []
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
krndatta
KarishmaB Ma'am,

Why cannot D be the answer?
If A(Fix an Omelet), then B(Use 6 Eggs)
If B(Use 6 Eggs), then C(No Pancakes)
IF A(Fix an Omelet), then C(No Pancakes)

So Not C---> Not A

Isn't this similar to the original argument?
Please evaluate where am I going wrong.

Thanks

Your logic of (D) is not wrong but (D)'s conclusion is not the same as the conclusion of the original argument.

(D) If you want to fix an omelet, you will have to use six eggs, and you will have no eggs left for pancakes, so if you make the omelet, you won’t be able to fix pancakes.

If A(Fix an Omelet), then B(Use 6 Eggs)
If B(Use 6 Eggs), then C(No Pancakes)

Conclusion: IF A(Fix an Omelet), then C(No Pancakes)

But the original argument's conclusion is 'If Not C, then A'
Both are valid but they are not the same.
Option B says 'If Not C, then A' and that is why it is correct.
User avatar
krndatta
Joined: 09 Feb 2020
Last visit: 17 Oct 2024
Posts: 383
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 433
Location: India
Posts: 383
Kudos: 43
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KarishmaB,

D's conclusion does not explicitly state the last step(Which is assumed). However, B explicitly states the last step. So thats why B is the answer?
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 14 Dec 2024
Posts: 15,547
Own Kudos:
70,259
 []
Given Kudos: 449
Location: Pune, India
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 15,547
Kudos: 70,259
 []
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
krndatta
KarishmaB,

D's conclusion does not explicitly state the last step(Which is assumed). However, B explicitly states the last step. So thats why B is the answer?

Yes, (D) does not explicitly conclude what is concluded in the original argument, but (B) does. That is why the reasoning of (B) most closely follows the reasoning of the original argument.
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 14 Dec 2024
Posts: 15,547
Own Kudos:
70,259
 []
Given Kudos: 449
Location: Pune, India
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 15,547
Kudos: 70,259
 []
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
When a region is in a drought, the water level of rivers and streams is seriously reduced. When water levels are down, food is also scarce for wildlife. Therefore, if food is not scarce for wildlife, then the region is not in a drought.

In which one of the following selections does the reasoning most closely follow the reasoning in the above passage?


(A) If the dirty clothes hamper is full, the sock drawer is empty, and if the sock drawer is empty, the dirty clothes hamper is full, so if the sock drawer is not empty, the clothes hamper is not full.

(B) If the temperature falls below freezing, the petunias will die, and if the petunias die, they will not flower any more, so if the petunias still produce flowers, the temperature is not below freezing.

(C) If raccoons bear live young, they must be mammals, so if they are amphibians, they must lay eggs to reproduce, if they reproduce at all.

(D) If you want to fix an omelet, you will have to use six eggs, and you will have no eggs left for pancakes, so if you make the omelet, you won’t be able to fix pancakes.

(E) If earth scientists are correct, global temperatures are warming, and if the earth’s temperature increases, ocean levels will rise, so if ocean levels rise, earth scientists were correct.


Original Argument of the author:

Premises:
When a region is in a drought, the water level reduces.
When water level reduces, food is scarce for wildlife.

Conclusion:
If food is not scarce for wildlife, then the region is not in a drought.
The argument is valid.

If/when A (draught), then B (low water level).
If/when B (low water level), then C (scarce food).
This leads to if/when A (draught), then C (scarce food).
From our understanding of the if-then conditionals, we know that in this case, ‘not C’ implies ‘not A’. So, if food is not scarce, we can say that there is no drought.

Premises:
If A, then B.
If B, then C.

Conclusion:
Since not C so not A.

We need to find another argument with similar reasoning.

(A) If the dirty clothes hamper is full, the sock drawer is empty, and if the sock drawer is empty, the dirty clothes hamper is full, so if the sock drawer is not empty, the clothes hamper is not full.

If A (hamper full), then B (sock drawer empty).
If B, then A.
This means A and B always occur together.
This is not the same structure as our original argument. Our original argument has ‘If A, then B.’ and ‘If B, then C.’

(B) If the temperature falls below freezing, the petunias will die, and if the petunias die, they will not flower anymore, so if the petunias still produce flowers, the temperature is not below freezing.

Premises:
If A (temp. falls), then B (petunias die).
If B (petunias die), then C (no flowers).

Conclusion:
Since not C (do produce flowers) so not A (temp does not fall).
This is the same structure as our original argument. Correct.

(C) If raccoons bear live young, they must be mammals, so if they are amphibians, they must lay eggs to reproduce, if they reproduce at all.

This is not the same structure as our original argument of ‘if A, then B; if B, then C’

(D) If you want to fix an omelet, you will have to use six eggs, and you will have no eggs left for pancakes, so if you make the omelet, you won’t be able to fix pancakes.

Premises:
If A (fix omelet), then B (use 6 eggs).
If B (use 6 eggs), then C (no pancakes).

Conclusion:
So, if A (fix omelette), then C (no pancakes).

This is not the same structure as our original argument in which the conclusion was ‘since not C so not A.’

(E) If earth scientists are correct, global temperatures are warming, and if the earth’s temperature increases, ocean levels will rise, so if ocean levels rise, earth scientists were correct.

Premises:
If A (scientists correct), then B (temp rising).
If B (temp rising), then C (ocean levels will rise).

Conclusion:
If C (ocean levels rise) then A (scientists are correct).
This is not a valid argument. ‘If A, then C’ does not imply ‘if C, then A’.
This is not the same structure as our original argument.

Answer (B)

Discussion on Mimic Questions: https://youtu.be/dHU17plF2mc

Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7163 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts