It is currently 25 Jun 2017, 09:11

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# When Alicia Green borrowed a neighbor's car without

Author Message
CEO
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3454
When Alicia Green borrowed a neighbor's car without [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Sep 2003, 11:20
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

25% (00:00) correct 75% (02:27) wrong based on 6 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

When Alicia Green borrowed a neighbor's car without permission, the police merely gave her a warning. However, when Peter Foster did the same thing, he was charged with automobile theft. Peter came to the attention of the police because the car he was driving was hit by a speeding taxi. Alicia was stopped because the car she was driving had defective taillights. It is true that the car Peter took got damaged and the car Alicia took did not, but since it was the taxi that caused the damage this difference was not due to any difference in the blameworthiness of their behavior. Therefore, Alicia should also have been charged with automobile theft.

18. The statement that the car Peter took got damaged and the car Alicia took did not plays which one of the following roles in the argument?

(A) It presents a reason that directly supports the conclusion.

(B) It justifies the difference in the actual outcome in the two cases.

(C) It demonstrates awareness of a fact on which a possible objection might be based.

(D) It illustrates a general principle on which the argument relies.

(E) It summarizes a position against which the argument is directed.

19. If all of the claims offered in support of the conclusion are accurate, each of the following could be true EXCEPT:

(A) The interests of justice would have been better served if the police had released Peter Foster with a warning.

(B) Alicia Green had never before driven a car belonging to someone else without first securing the owner┬б┬пs permission.

(C) Peter Foster was hit by the taxi while he was running a red light, whereas Alicia Green drove with extra care to avoid drawing the attention of the police to the car she had taken.

(D) Alicia Green barely missed hitting a pedestrian when she sped through a red light ten minutes before she was stopped by the police for driving a car that had defective taillights.

(E) Peter Foster had been cited for speeding twice in the preceding month, whereas Alicia Green had never been cited for a traffic violation.
CEO
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3454

### Show Tags

28 Sep 2003, 12:23
Quote:
I pick B) for 18

B is wrong

Quote:
C) for 19

C is correct
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Aug 2003
Posts: 257
Location: Bangalore

### Show Tags

28 Sep 2003, 21:30
will go wih C for both.
18) Based on this evidence author argues that since Peter was not responsible for the damage, so both of them are equally to be blamed for their act. It is fact on which objection is raised later in the argument.
19) Argument basically claims that Alicia should also be charged with theft and to support it author says that Peter was not responsible for damage (grounds on which he has caught). No C syas peter jumped the red light. This goes against argument and justifies peter being caught by police.

thanks
Math Forum Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 2010
Re: CR : Alicia Green, #1 - 18 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Dec 2010, 06:11

Peter came to the attention of the police because the car he was driving was hit by a speeding taxi -- this information is correct as per the author.

'c' directly contradicts it by saying that it was Peter who ran the red lights and met with the accident whereas it was the taxi driver whose speeding caused the accident. 'c' can never be correct.
_________________
Retired Moderator
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1657
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Re: CR : Alicia Green, #1 - 18 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Dec 2010, 16:19
18: C
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Manager
Joined: 27 Oct 2010
Posts: 183
Re: CR : Alicia Green, #1 - 18 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Jan 2011, 18:54
IMO 18) C 19) D
Re: CR : Alicia Green, #1 - 18   [#permalink] 21 Jan 2011, 18:54
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Neighboring landholders: Air pollution from the giant 7 08 Aug 2010, 05:03
Neighboring landholders: Air pollution from the giant 2 07 Dec 2009, 16:42
A stingray without parasites is healthier than it would be 5 04 Sep 2009, 03:04
When Alicia Green borrowed a neighbor s car without 16 14 Jun 2009, 23:14
1 Yolanda: Gaining access to computers without authorization 24 06 Jul 2008, 19:15
Display posts from previous: Sort by