GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 22 May 2019, 04:03

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# When politicians resort to personal attacks, many editorialists critic

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Jan 2017
Posts: 307
Location: Canada
When politicians resort to personal attacks, many editorialists critic  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Feb 2017, 02:43
6
00:00

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

62% (02:01) correct 38% (02:03) wrong based on 201 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

When politicians resort to personal attacks, many editorialists criticize these attacks but most voters pay them scant attention. Everyone knows such attacks will end after election day, and politicians can be excused for mudslinging. Political commentators, however, cannot be. Political commentators should be engaged in sustained and serious debate about ideas and policies. In such a context personal attacks on opponents serve not to beat those opponents but to cut off the debate.

Which of the following most accurately states the main point of the argument?

(A) Personal attacks on opponents serve a useful purpose for politicians.
(B) Political commentators should not resort to personal attacks on their opponents.
(C) Editorialists are right to criticize politicians who resort to personal attacks on their opponents.
(D) The purpose of serious debate about ideas and policies is to counteract the effect of personal attacks by politicians.
(E) Voters should be concerned about the personal attacks politicians make on each other
Manager
Joined: 24 Dec 2015
Posts: 56
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
GPA: 3.8
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Re: When politicians resort to personal attacks, many editorialists critic  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Feb 2017, 03:14
A
Main point of the argument is that, politicians mudslinging has become a thing of routine to the public, so when the editorials are paying attention to these unworthy chatter they are wasting precious air time. In turn, helping the politicians .
Director
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Posts: 564
Location: India
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
Re: When politicians resort to personal attacks, many editorialists critic  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Feb 2017, 19:09
Top Contributor
Simplify the argument -

Mudslinging by politicians ends after election day --> Politicians CAN be excused for mudslinging.

HOWEVER(this indicates a contrast. Suggests that what is applicable to politicians may not be applicable to others).

Personal attacks on opponents serve not to beat opponents but to cut off the debate --> Political commentators CANNOT be engaged in personal attacks.

The last part of this is the main conclusion of the argument. Other sentences such as "Political commentators should be engaged in sustained ..." and "In such a context, personal attacks on opponents serve not to beat opponents ..." support that conclusion.

Which answer option states this? Option B.

Option A -
the argument does not talk about the usefulness of personal attacks.
Option C -
The author does not share her opinion on whether such criticism of politicians is right or wrong.
Option D -
We do not know what the purpose of serious debate is as it is not mentioned in the argument.
Option E -
We know that voters pay attention to such things. Whether they should be concerned about them or not is not mentioned.
_________________
- CrackVerbal Prep Team

For more info on GMAT and MBA, follow us on @AskCrackVerbal

Register for the Free GMAT Kickstarter Course : http://bit.ly/2DDHKHq

Register for our Personal Tutoring Course : https://www.crackverbal.com/gmat/personal-tutoring/

Join the free 4 part GMAT video training series : http://bit.ly/2DGm8tR
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 4343
Re: When politicians resort to personal attacks, many editorialists critic  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Nov 2018, 04:42
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
Re: When politicians resort to personal attacks, many editorialists critic   [#permalink] 26 Nov 2018, 04:42
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# When politicians resort to personal attacks, many editorialists critic

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.