Whenever an artist endowed with both a high level of artistic skill

Question

Whenever an artist endowed with both a high level of artistic skill and a high degree of creativity combines these two abilities in the process of creating an artwork, the resulting product is a great work of art. Moreover, no work of art can be great unless both of these elements are combined in its execution. Thus, great works of art are necessarily rare.

Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?

(A) Not every artist possesses a high level of artistic skill.

(B) A high degree of creativity and a high level of artistic skill are seldom combined in the creation of a work of art.

(C) An artist endowed with a high degree of creativity and a high level of artistic skill will necessarily produce great works of art.

(D) Few artists are endowed with a high degree of creativity.

(E) Anyone endowed with both a high level of artistic skill and a high degree of creativity will produce only a few great works of art.

GmatStuck · Answer

The passage is based on the conditional reasoning: 
Great Art Work = sufficient condition 
Combination of High level of artistic skill and creativity = Necessary Condition 
Conclusion: Great Art works are rare

Answer Analysis:

A: We are not given any info about this.
B: If true and both are rarely combined than the great work of arts is rare as stated in the passage but if negated and if they are always combined in the work of art than the work of art cannot be rare. negation works. 
C: we are told what it takes to create a great work of art we are not told if someone with both the attributes will necessarily create great work of art always 
D: We are not told about this 
E: we are not told how many great art work someone with both attribute will produce

I hope this make sense

Saviooo · Answer

here the author tells us the required incredients for great work of art, and then they immediately jump to the conclusion: "Therefore, great art is rare."

But wait... how do they know that? They never actually told us how common or rare the ingredients are! For all we know, maybe 95% of artists in the world are dripping with high skill and high creativity. If everyone has both ingredients, great art wouldn't be rare at all; it would be everywhere.

To make the logic work, the author must be assuming that having both ingredients together is a rare occurrence.

(B) is the winning answer. It explicitly bridges the gap. If the combination of high skill and high creativity is seldom (rarely) combined, then it logically follows that great art must be rare. If you negate this (the combination is actually very common), the author's whole argument falls apart.

TheAdmissionHub · Answer

Premises: 
1. If an artist has both high artistic skill and high creativity and combines them in creating a work, the result is a great work of art. 
2. No work can be great unless both elements are combined.
Conclusion: Great works of art are necessarily rare.

We need to look for an  assumption  bridging the gap between the evidences and the conclusion:
To get from "great works require both traits" to "great works are rare," the argument must assume that the combination of those two traits in the creation of artworks is itself rare.

Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?

(A) Not every artist has high skill.
 Wrong : Even if true, many other artists may still have both traits. So, we cannot conclude that great work of art are rare.

(B) A high degree of creativity and a high level of artistic skill are seldom combined in the creation of a work of art.
 Correct:  this is exactly what we predicted. I f we test the negative technique here, and assume that both these two traits are often combined in the creation of work of art, the argument would not hold, that is we wouldn’t be able to estabilsh the rarity of work or art.

(C) Artists with both traits necessarily produce great works.
 Wrong:  This strengthens the link between traits and greatness but says nothing about whether such works are rare.

(D) Few artists have high creativity.
 Wrong:  Imagine that only 10% of artists are highly creative. However, all of those artists are also highly skilled technically. And each of them produces a large number of works. So, it doesn’t establish rarity. It’s similar to A.

(E) People with both traits produce only a few great works.
 Wrong:  we can test the Negative technique here: There is at least one person who possesses both qualities and produces many great works of art.
Ex:
Artist a produces 100
Artist b produces 100
This negation does not undermine the argument. Great works of art could still be rare overall, even if there is at least one person with both qualities who produces many great works. Therefore, choice E is not a necessary assumption.
The argument could still hold that great works of art are rare compared with the vast number of works produced by artists who do not possess both qualities.

Whenever an artist endowed with both a high level of artistic skill

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR) Questions

Whenever an artist endowed with both a high level of artistic skill

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards