To solve this question, let us deploy
IMS's four-step technique.
STEP #1 ->
IDENTIFY THE QUESTION TYPELet us read the question stem to identify the question type.
Quote:
Which of the following most accurately expresses a flaw in the reasoning? The stem indicates a flaw question.
STEP #2 -> DECONSTRUCT THE ARGUMENT
In a flaw question, it is a must to deconstruct the argument by figuring out the conclusion and the premise(s). Let us therefore read the argument and deconstruct it.Quote:
Peter: Recent evidence suggests that moderate alcohol consumption has certain beneficial effects on health. In particular, alcohol creates an inhospitable environment in the human body for certain bacteria that can cause illness. Thus, alcohol consumption is, on balance, beneficial. CONCLUSION: Alcohol consumption is, on balance, beneficial.
PREMISES: -> Recent evidence suggests that moderate alcohol consumption has certain beneficial effects on health.
-> In particular, alcohol creates an inhospitable environment in the human body for certain bacteria that can cause illness.
Now that the argument is deconstructed, let us proceed to the third step.
STEP #3 ->
FRAME A SHADOW ANSWERIn order to frame a shadow answer, we need to know what the right answer should do. In the given flaw question, we are to figure out the flaw in the reasoning of Peter. We notice that Peter says alcohol consumption is beneficial overall ('on balance' means 'overall' or 'all things considered', so those of you who are confused have probably misunderstood the meaning of this phrase. 'On balance', let me emphasise, does not mean 'moderate'). So, the author is actually speaking of moderate alcohol consumption in the premise but is drawing a conclusion about alcohol consumption in general. Should he not have spoken of moderate alcohol consumption in his conclusion as well? Now, this becomes the flaw.
SHADOW ANSWER: An option that indicates Peter's mistake of drawing a generalised conclusion about alcohol consumption while basing the conclusion on a premise that speaks of moderate alcohol consumption.
Now that a shadow answer is framed, let us proceed to the final step.
STEP #4 ->
ELIMINATE INCORRECT OPTIONSOptions that do not match the shadow answer can be eliminated.
A. It takes for granted that people choose to consume alcohol because they believe it is beneficial to their health. - NOT A MATCH - Peter does not talk of people's beliefs. And if he does not talk of it, it is wrong to say he takes for granted something about it. - ELIMINATE
B. It draws a comparison based on popular belief rather than on scientific opinion. - NOT A MATCH - Peter has quoted evidence, so he is definitely not drawing the stated comparison. - ELIMINATE
C. It fails to consider methods of achieving the same beneficial effects that do not involve alcohol. - NOT A MATCH - We do not know if there are methods of achieving the SAME beneficial effects that do not involve alcohol. - ELIMINATE
D. It draws a conclusion about alcohol consumption in general from a premise about moderate alcohol consumption. - MATCHES THE SHADOW ANSWER - Based on the shadow answer we have, this is our best bet. - KEEP
E. It fails to consider that alcohol may have no effect on many bacteria that cause illness in human beings. - NOT A MATCH - Peter speaks of CERTAIN bacteria, so it would be wrong on our part to say his argument fails to consider that alcohol may have no effect on many bacteria that cause illness in human beings. - ELIMINATE
Hence, (D) is the correct answer.