Hi abvoluptatum,Yes, you've got it exactly right, and this is a habit worth locking in permanently:
whenever you break an absolute-value equation into cases, every candidate you find must be checked against the condition of the case it came from.Here's why. When you drop the bars, you assume something about the sign inside:
-
Case 1 (inside ≥ 0): x + 2 = -x → 2x = -2 →
x = -1. This case assumes x + 2 ≥ 0, i.e. x ≥ -2. Since -1 ≥ -2, the candidate
survives. ✓
-
Case 2 (inside < 0): -(x + 2) = -x → -2 = 0, which is impossible. No candidate at all.
So |x + 2| = -x gives
exactly one valid solution,
x = -1. That's why E is the answer.
Why the check is not optionalLook at choice
D in the thread - that's the clearest proof of your point. Solving the negative case gave
x = 1/4, but that case assumed x < 0. Since
1/4 is positive, it
violates its own condition, so it gets thrown out and D ends up with zero solutions. If you had skipped the check, you'd have wrongly counted a solution there.
The rule: a candidate is real only if it satisfies
both the equation
and the sign assumption of the case that produced it.
Quick one to cement the habitTry solving |x| = x - 3:
- Case x ≥ 0: x = x - 3 → 0 = -3, impossible.
- Case x < 0: -x = x - 3 →
x = 3/2. But
3/2 is
not negative, so discard it.
Zero solutions - you only know that because you checked. Same discipline every time.
Answer: Eabvoluptatum
we do have to check for the possible solutions right , |x+2|=-x has 1 solution