Which school for entertainment or luxury goods strategy?

Hey guys, seeing all the fantastic advice you all give to people on this forum, I thought I would write a post myself. Would really appreciate your thoughts on the following situation:

- Planning to apply to full time MBA programs this summer/fall to start in Fall 2014, will be 26 when applying
- Assume GPA/GMAT/Essays/Extracurrics are all competitive, this is a question of career prospects, international recognition, and school culture
- Have a BS+MS in Engineering, and about 4 years of industry experience. 3 of those are in project management at a defense contractor, and for the past year have been working in management consulting for a Big 4 firm, specifically strategy and operations, recently mostly in the entertainment and media sectors.
- After school I would like to do one of two things: 1. Brand Management/Strategy/Marketing in the luxury goods/fashion/entertainment sector or 2. Go into the brand management practice or innovation practice of Bain/BCG.
- Stanford is top choice for me, HBS is 2nd (based on visiting both schools). Also visited Wharton - that's out. Not a fan at all of Philly, and the focus of the people I talked to at there seemed to be largely on getting into finance instead of enjoying their time at the school and pursuing their passions. I could be wrong, but that was my impression
- Would like to work back and forth between Europe and the US after MBA, so international reputation is a factor for me

Here are my questions on which additional school(s) to apply to, and I sincerely would like your opinion:
- Should I apply to Chicago/Kellogg? Based on my research it would appear that the Mid-West (i.e. Chicago and Kellogg) is not the best for careers in luxury goods/fashion just because Chicago is not a fashion hub. That being said, Kellogg places the most people into MBB on this side of the Atlantic Ocean and has a strong marketing reputation. Kellogg also seems to have a well established Luxury Goods club. How well of a fit career wise would you say Chicago and/or Kellogg would be for me? From what I understand Chicago is more finance oriented than Kellogg, and has a more "nerdy" than "collaborative" reputation (and I understand that these are generalities). My goal is to enjoy my time there while getting to know people with whom I can form great connections with and that would set me up the best for my career goals.

- Should I apply to MIT? Frankly, I am worried that because of my BS and MS in Engineering, going to MIT will cement in people's minds that I am a tech-oriented person, which I am far from. One of the main reasons for me for getting an MBA is to avoid that perception and re-brand myself more towards marketing/strategy than engineering/tech/operations. The fact that 43% of MIT's class is folks with UGrad engineering degrees concerns me a little. I worry that the class may not be diverse enough to where 2 out of 5 people have an interest in tech/operations/manufacturing leadership roles after their MBA (and I understand this is discounting the fact that some of those engineers also don't want to be engineers after their MBA). However, I feel that Boston has a strong luxury goods presence and both HBS and MIT would be good choices from that perspective. Would MIT's tech reputation, especially abroad, work against me?

- Should I apply to Columbia? I know NY has a great luxury goods presence, but my concern lies with the culture. How collaborative is the culture as opposed to cutthroat?

General Questions:
1. I don't think they do, but would any of these schools be better for getting into Bain/BCG? How about Luxury Goods/Entertainment strategy/marketing?
2. Which of the schools (or others) would have better international reputation? MIT/Columbia/Booth/Kellogg. London Business School is another option, but how good of a reputation would that have for Bain/BCG in the US?

Thank you all in advance for all your inputs.