Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
Originally posted by heilaryan on 19 Jul 2023, 05:24.
Last edited by heilaryan on 19 Jul 2023, 06:02, edited 1 time in total.
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I am a little confused as to why the doer of the action is necessary to be present in the sentence when an -ing or an -ed modifier is modifying an action/verb.
example: Why is the below sentence incorrect (because the doer of the action represented by the modifier is missing -- but why the doer is important?? Will it distort the meaning if we omit the doer)
The problem was identified, using the latest technology.
Also related to this doubt, please also clarify what is being modified in the below sentence - the action(identified) or the noun(engineer)
The problem was identified by the engineer, using latest technology.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
I am a little confused as to why the doer of the action is necessary to be present in the sentence when an -ing or an -ed modifier is modifying an action/verb.
example: Why is the below sentence incorrect (because the doer of the action represented by the modifier is missing -- but why the doer is important?? Will it distort the meaning if we omit the doer)
The problem was identified, using the latest technology.
Also related to this doubt, please also clarify what is being modified in the below sentence - the action(identified) or the noun(engineer)
The problem was identified by the engineer, using latest technology.
In English grammar, the presence or absence of the doer (the one performing the action) in a sentence with an "-ing" or an "-ed" modifier can influence the clarity and understanding of the sentence. Let's take a look at your examples to understand this better:
The problem was identified, using the latest technology. The problem was identified by the engineer, using the latest technology.
In the first sentence, "using the latest technology" is an "-ing" modifier, and it modifies the action "identified." However, the doer of the action is not explicitly mentioned in the sentence. While the sentence is grammatically correct, it lacks clarity. Without knowing who or what is performing the action, the sentence may sound vague and leave the reader wondering who identified the problem.
In the second sentence, "by the engineer" is an "-ed" modifier, specifying the doer of the action "identified." Here, the sentence provides clarity by mentioning that the engineer is the one who identified the problem, and they did so using the latest technology.
So, to answer your question, including the doer in a sentence with an "-ing" or an "-ed" modifier can make the sentence more precise and informative. It helps avoid ambiguity and ensures that the reader understands who performed the action.
mentioning the doer(subject) adds more clarity, however in passive construction we often see the doer(subject) missing from the sentence. consider this -> The Colleseum was built in 100AD. This is a simple sentence however this provides the information about the time the Colleseum was built while not mentioning who built it. I suppose the information is not so relevant for this sentence as such, however why does this information regarding the subject becomes relevant when we introduce a modifier in the sentence same sentence such as this one -> The Colleseum was built in 100AD, using medieval tools. All the sources I've found till now say that this sentence is incorrect and that the subject must be present for the modifier to correctly modify the verb "was built".
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.