Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 1811:00 AM PST
-12:00 PM PST
Join us in a live GMAT practice session and solve 30 challenging GMAT questions with other test takers in timed conditions, covering GMAT Quant, Data Sufficiency, Data Insights, Reading Comprehension, and Critical Reasoning questions.
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
18 Dec 2021, 09:59
Kudos
Bookmarks
Most employers agree that how a candidate dresses for a job interview and even "the way he positions himself" in his seat leave a lasting impression
The part in quotes is erroneous according to Manhattan, and the correction should be "how he positions himself", but I don't understand why 'how' is part of the parallelism, and why the sentence isn't okay as it is. Thanks
Posted from my mobile device
The part in quotes is erroneous according to Manhattan, and the correction should be "how he positions himself", but I don't understand why 'how' is part of the parallelism, and why the sentence isn't okay as it is. Thanks
Posted from my mobile device
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
18 Dec 2021, 13:11
Kudos
Bookmarks
hashash1n1
Hello, hashash1n1. Let me be clear about my position as someone who has studied linguistics: No one would think twice about the original sentence outside of the context of the GMAT™. It is perfectly functional. That said, on the GMAT™, if you have to choose between two options that follow and without a comma, then you should look to match the second element as closely as you can (within reason) to the first. Because the subject of the embedded clause is a noun clause itself—how a candidate dresses for a job interview—and that subject, because of the and, becomes a compound subject (as in, Jamie and Bobby went to the store), we should be seeking a second noun clause that parallels the first. How he positions himself delivers to that end: how + subject/pronoun + verb follows the same order as before. For that reason, and really for that reason alone, it would be the correct answer to a GMAT™ SC question.
I think I may have found the template for the Manhattan Prep question in this classic from several years ago. Notice the similarity:
Quote:
Although it is categorized as a Hard question in the forum, if you know how to navigate the parallelism, you should find the task quite simple. (The question took me 20 seconds when I laid eyes on it about a month ago.)
Perhaps that helps with your query. Of course, I would suggest you see what the folks at Manhattan Prep have to say about parallelism in general. They certainly know what they are talking about.
Good luck with your studies.
- Andrew
19 Dec 2021, 00:39
Kudos
Bookmarks
See these two sentences:
"How a candidate dresses for a job interview leaves a lasting impression."
"The way he positions himself in his seat leaves a lasting impression."
In the first sentence the subject is "how a candidate dresses for a job".
In the second the subject is "the way he positions himself in his seat".
The sentence from Manhattan Prep combines these two statements into one:
"How a candidate dresses for a job interview and even the way he positions himself in his seat leave a lasting impression."
Now we have two things that leave a lasting impression. The two things are joined by AND. Ideally, the two should be perfectly parallel.
We can have degrees of parallelism, just as we can have degrees of ambiguity.
Posted from my mobile device
"How a candidate dresses for a job interview leaves a lasting impression."
"The way he positions himself in his seat leaves a lasting impression."
In the first sentence the subject is "how a candidate dresses for a job".
In the second the subject is "the way he positions himself in his seat".
The sentence from Manhattan Prep combines these two statements into one:
"How a candidate dresses for a job interview and even the way he positions himself in his seat leave a lasting impression."
Now we have two things that leave a lasting impression. The two things are joined by AND. Ideally, the two should be perfectly parallel.
Quote:
The parallelism isn't perfect, but "erroneous" may be too strong a word.
We can have degrees of parallelism, just as we can have degrees of ambiguity.
Posted from my mobile device
