Bunuel
Winter storms in Lakeville cause icy road conditions, which the Department of Public Works alleviates by applying road salt after storms. It takes far less salt to prevent icy conditions by applying salt before a winter storm, however, than it does to melt the ice after the fact. In order to reduce the environment damage caused by salt on Lakeville’s main roads, the department plans to apply salt to those roads whenever a winter storm is predicted.
Which of the following would be most useful to establish in evaluating the plan’s chances for success?
(A) How much road salt costs the department
(B) How frequently winter storms predicted for Lakeville fail to arrive
(C) What proportion of Lakeville’s minor roads are salted after storms
(D) How often Lakeville experiences winter storms
(E) What percentage of the accidents that occur as a result of icy conditions on Lakeville’s roads occur on minor roads
GMAT™ Focus Sample Question from mba.com Plan: The department plans to apply salt to those roads whenever a winter storm
is predictedGoal: In order to reduce the environment damage caused by salt on Lakeville’s main roads
Reasoning: It takes far less salt to prevent icy conditions by applying salt before a winter storm, than it does to melt the ice after the storms.
In arriving at the conclusion the author assumes that almost all predictions will lead to a Winter Storm and thereby result in icy roads. Hence, to evaluate the argument one needs to know the probability of success/failure of the prediction.
Answer Choice Elmination(A) How much road salt costs the department
Cost is not the factor in the entire argument. The goal is to reduce the environmental damage. Hence, factoring in the cost is out of scope in the context of the argument.(B) How frequently winter storms predicted for Lakeville fail to arrive
This option looks quite promising. One needs to know what's the rate of success of the prediction, because the salts will now be applied whenever a storm is predicted. If MOST of the predicted winter storms fail to arrive, then applying road salt whenever the prediction is made will lead to more harm than the current setting does. However, if NONE (or very FEW) winter storms predicted for Lakeville fail to arrive, then applying the road salt whenever the prediction is made makes sense. Let's keep this option(C) What proportion of Lakeville’s minor roads are salted after storms
Knowing this information doesn't really matter. Whatever portion it is, the same portion needs to be salted either before the storm or after. Hence, this option is a distortion.(D) How often Lakeville experiences winter storms
While this option looks promising if one considers that the plan will work if Lakeville experiences winter storms often, however, the option weakly impacts the argument. Note, that the public department currently applies road salt whenever the storm occurs and the plan is to apply salt to those roads whenever a winter storm is predicted. Hence, regardless of the frequency of the winter storms the road salts are applied. Choice B is much superior to this choice. Hence, we can eliminate this.(E) What percentage of the accidents that occur as a result of icy conditions on Lakeville’s roads occur on minor roads
Out of scope. The goal is to reduce the amount of road salt applied, and thereby reduce the environmental damage caused by such salt on Lakeville’s main roads. Accidents are not a factor in the entire argument.Option B