Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 10:06 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 10:06
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Nilabh_s
Joined: 23 Jun 2013
Last visit: 11 Aug 2014
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
63
 [21]
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 28
Kudos: 63
 [21]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
20
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
tchang
Joined: 07 Sep 2013
Last visit: 01 Nov 2014
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
23
 [8]
Concentration: Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.52
Posts: 22
Kudos: 23
 [8]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Nilabh_s
Joined: 23 Jun 2013
Last visit: 11 Aug 2014
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
63
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 28
Kudos: 63
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Phoenix72
Joined: 29 Jun 2011
Last visit: 06 Oct 2013
Posts: 67
Own Kudos:
51
 [1]
Given Kudos: 29
GPA: 3.5
WE 1: Information Technology(Retail)
Posts: 67
Kudos: 51
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Is this a GMAT like question? Adding 'I' in B changes the meaning of the sentence?
User avatar
Nilabh_s
Joined: 23 Jun 2013
Last visit: 11 Aug 2014
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 28
Kudos: 63
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Yes it is from "GMATClub Grammar Book" page 186 question -23
User avatar
fireinbelly
Joined: 01 Feb 2012
Last visit: 09 Jul 2017
Posts: 78
Own Kudos:
153
 [2]
Given Kudos: 151
Posts: 78
Kudos: 153
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Here only A and B make some sense....others are un-necessary wordy and incorrect -

a) Without fully understanding the problem - there is no subject in this clause....hence meaning remains unclear...hence incorrect

b) Because I didn’t understand the problem well - correct tense and has clear meaning

c) Because the problem wasn’t fully understood - passive voice is usually avoided in gmat where active voice can be used

d) Because of the lack of understanding of the problem - awkward

e) The problem which I didn’t understand well - makes no sense.....awkward

hope you get it...


papahiroshi
23. Without fully understanding the problem, it was difficult to explain to the mechanic.

a) Without fully understanding the problem

b) Because I didn’t understand the problem well

c) Because the problem wasn’t fully understood

d) Because of the lack of understanding of the problem

e) The problem which I didn’t understand well

This question is from GMAT club Ultimate GMAT Grammar book. It's free! Thanks bb. :-D
User avatar
cledgard
Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 160
Own Kudos:
356
 [1]
Given Kudos: 71
Status:GMAT Coach
Location: Peru
GPA: 3.98
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 160
Kudos: 356
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
tchang
This original sentence doesn't have a subject. WHO found it difficult to explain the problem to the mechanic? This sentence needs a subject. Eliminate A, C and D.

The word "because" makes more sense here and gives a reason WHY it was difficult to explain the problem.

Choose:
t1000


But if the original sentence doesn't have a subject, why should we assume that the subject is "I". Couldn't the subject be "you" or "he"? The meaning in answer "B" is changed.
User avatar
nipun21
Joined: 05 Jun 2018
Last visit: 24 May 2021
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
20
 [2]
Given Kudos: 77
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 560 Q49 V18
GMAT 2: 660 Q47 V35
GPA: 4
GMAT 2: 660 Q47 V35
Posts: 18
Kudos: 20
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I chose option C. It has 'problem' as the subject and the pronoun 'it' is correctly referencing to the subject. This is how I reached option C. I felt there is no need to introduce a person as is done in option B since this may change the intended meaning. Kindly help.
Thank you.
avatar
spkumar
Joined: 28 Jul 2013
Last visit: 23 Aug 2019
Posts: 13
Given Kudos: 15
GMAT 1: 620 Q46 V29
GMAT 1: 620 Q46 V29
Posts: 13
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nipun21
I chose option C. It has 'problem' as the subject and the pronoun 'it' is correctly referencing to the subject. This is how I reached option C. I felt there is no need to introduce a person as is done in option B since this may change the intended meaning. Kindly help.
Thank you.
I too feel exactly the same. "It" is referring to the "problem" (as a subject). Please explain
User avatar
ligamenttears
Joined: 21 Jun 2016
Last visit: 14 Nov 2025
Posts: 34
Own Kudos:
7
 [1]
Given Kudos: 33
Location: Austria
Schools: WBS CEIBS
GMAT 1: 660 Q46 V32
Schools: WBS CEIBS
GMAT 1: 660 Q46 V32
Posts: 34
Kudos: 7
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Here is another explanation:

Word like believe, understand, recognize, etc are non-continuous verbs. (Page 43, GMAT CLUB Ultimate Grammar 2v1)

For eg:
Correct: He understands the assignment
Incorrect: He is understanding the assignment

Keeping above rule in mind, we can eliminate A and D.

E has incorrect sentence construction, so we can eliminate that as well. We are left with B and C which have correct construction.

B = Mention of "I" which is assumed as the subject in the sentence ("I" is not there in the original sentence, this way we are straying away from the actual meaning of the sentence)
C= No mention of "I", the subject is "problem". Meaning also matches with the original sentence.

Now, I chose C thinking it is wrong to deviate from the meaning of the original sentence. However, B is marked correctly. According to my analysis of GMAT CLUB Grammar book questions, the correct answer always has right sentence construction, even though it is not implying the exact same meaning. The writer of the question would only choose B > C only if the word "problem" cannot be used as a subject.

Two questions for grammar experts:
1) Can we use words like "problem" as a subject?
2) In actual GMAT scenario, is it true that correct sentence construction of a phrase will be deemed more correct than actual meaning of the sentence? Because in OG this is not the case :)

Hope this helps!
avatar
Purvidebuka
Joined: 16 May 2017
Last visit: 11 Jul 2022
Posts: 17
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 120
Location: India
Posts: 17
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Experts,

Could you please explain why B is the correct answer? I found it quite peculiar.
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,502
Own Kudos:
7,511
 [3]
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,502
Kudos: 7,511
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Purvidebuka
Hi Experts,

Could you please explain why B is the correct answer? I found it quite peculiar.
Sure, Purvidebuka, I will take a shot.

Quote:
Without fully understanding the problem, it was difficult to explain to the mechanic.

a) Without fully understanding the problem
The problem with the original sentence is that understanding is a modifier, and the subject, the one who understands, should follow the comma, not itit was not doing any thinking. Without is acting to negate the information that follows, and fully simply modifies understanding; if the sentence were to start with understandingunderstanding the problem, it...—I doubt many people would be fooled by this answer choice.

Quote:
b) Because I didn’t understand the problem well
You have to keep in mind that anything that is underlined can be negotiated, so the sudden appearance of the subject I is not an inherent problem. Neither is the switch from fully understand to understand... well an issue. It is just another way to head the sentence. The only question is whether this beginning is functional. The answer is yes. An introductory or dependent clause leads into the main clause, and the meaning is fine—Because I didn't understand the problem well, [the problem] was difficult to explain... This option is at least worth keeping in the running.

Quote:
c) Because the problem wasn’t fully understood
Now this is a completely debatable answer choice. The passive voice appears in several OAs to official questions, so we cannot say that an active construct is necessarily better. We need to find another way to separate this answer choice from our perfectly valid one above. You might point to the lack of a subject in this iteration, but remember, the subject appeared in the underlined portion. Who is to say that a room full of, say, physicists at a public presentation were not discussing a complex problem when a mechanic in the audience asked a question, and then the events that this sentence outlines transpired? Such an interpretation cannot be ruled out, and the answer choice remains on the table.

Quote:
d) Because of the lack of understanding of the problem
The diction here is what is lacking. Because of the lack of achieves nothing in the way of clarity that a more concise without does not. Neither can we get behind a change such as Lacking an understanding... since the same dangling participle that we saw in the original sentence would plague the grammatical construction. (Again, it cannot possess an understanding of anything.)

Quote:
e) The problem which I didn’t understand well
GMAC™ has stated in more recent OGs that a restrictive which versus that is not the sort of split that will be tested, so that point is a nonissue. However, the redundant the problem..., it cannot be overlooked, since the relative clause subordinates the information that follows (up to the comma). This fatal flaw should be easy to spot.

I guarantee that answer choices (B) and (C) would not appear as such on the GMAT™, side by side. I would say that (B) is the safer bet, but it really depends on the context, and that is a luxury we do not have with this question. My guess is that the person who wrote it intended to make a point about introducing a proper agent or doer of an action such as thinking in a sentence that goes on to talk about explaining something. In my view, either (B) or (C) could be defended.

As always, I would suggest studying official questions for Verbal preparation. (It is okay to have fun with side questions from time to time.)

- Andrew
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,830
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,830
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts